Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nature ; 588(7839): 625-630, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33328640

ABSTRACT

Growing populations and agricultural intensification have led to raised riverine nitrogen (N) loads, widespread oxygen depletion in coastal zones (coastal hypoxia)1 and increases in the incidence of algal blooms.Although recent work has suggested that individual wetlands have the potential to improve water quality2-9, little is known about the current magnitude of wetland N removal at the landscape scale. Here we use National Wetland Inventory data and 5-kilometre grid-scale estimates of N inputs and outputs to demonstrate that current N removal by US wetlands (about 860 ± 160 kilotonnes of nitrogen per year) is limited by a spatial disconnect between high-density wetland areas and N hotspots. Our model simulations suggest that a spatially targeted increase in US wetland area by 10 per cent (5.1 million hectares) would double wetland N removal. This increase would provide an estimated 54 per cent decrease in N loading in nitrate-affected watersheds such as the Mississippi River Basin. The costs of this increase in area would be approximately 3.3 billion US dollars annually across the USA-nearly twice the cost of wetland restoration on non-agricultural, undeveloped land-but would provide approximately 40 times more N removal. These results suggest that water quality improvements, as well as other types of ecosystem services such as flood control and fish and wildlife habitat, should be considered when creating policy regarding wetland restoration and protection.


Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources/methods , Nitrates/isolation & purification , Nitrates/metabolism , Wetlands , Agriculture , Animals , Conservation of Natural Resources/economics , Environmental Policy/economics , Environmental Policy/trends , Environmental Restoration and Remediation/economics , Environmental Restoration and Remediation/methods , Eutrophication , Floods/prevention & control , Geographic Mapping , Rivers , United States , Water Quality
2.
Science ; 365(6455)2019 08 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31439763

ABSTRACT

Ballard et al argue that our prediction of a 30-year or longer recovery time for Gulf of Mexico water quality is highly uncertain, and that much shorter time lags are equally likely. We demonstrate that their argument, based on the use of a two-component regression model, does not sufficiently consider fundamental watershed processes or multiple lines of evidence suggesting the existence of decadal-scale lags.


Subject(s)
Nitrogen/analysis , Water Quality , Goals , Gulf of Mexico
3.
Science ; 360(6387): 427-430, 2018 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29567808

ABSTRACT

In August 2017, the Gulf of Mexico's hypoxic zone was declared to be the largest ever measured. It has been estimated that a 60% decrease in watershed nitrogen (N) loading may be necessary to adequately reduce eutrophication in the Gulf. However, to date there has been no rigorous assessment of the effect of N legacies on achieving water quality goals. In this study, we show that even if agricultural N use became 100% efficient, it would take decades to meet target N loads due to legacy N within the Mississippi River basin. Our results suggest that both long-term commitment and large-scale changes in agricultural management practices will be necessary to decrease Mississippi N loads and to meet current goals for reducing the size of the Gulf hypoxic zone.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...