Valproic acid sensitizes human glioma cells for temozolomide and γ-radiation.

Temozolomide (TMZ) is given in addition to radiotherapy in glioma patients, but its interaction with the commonly prescribed antiepileptic drug valproic acid (VPA) is largely unknown. Induction of DNA demethylation by VPA could potentially induce expression of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) protein, causing resistance to TMZ and thereby antagonizing its effect. Therefore, this study investigates the interaction between VPA, TMZ, and γ-radiation. Two glioma cell lines were used that differ in TMZ sensitivity caused by the absence (D384) or presence (T98) of the MGMT protein. VPA was administered before (24/48 h) or after (24 h) single doses of γ-radiation; or, after 24 h, VPA treatment was accompanied by a single dose of TMZ for another 24 h. For trimodal treatment the combination of VPA and TMZ was followed by single doses of γ-radiation. In both cell lines VPA caused enhancement of the radiation response after preincubation (DMF(0.2) 1.4 and 1.5) but not after postirradiation (DMF(0.2) 1.1 and 1.0). The combination of VPA and TMZ caused enhanced cytotoxicity (DMF(0.2) 1.7) in both the TMZ-sensitive cell line (D384) and the TMZ-resistant cell line (T98). The combination of VPA and TMZ caused a significant radiation enhancement (DMF(0.2) 1.9 and 1.6) that was slightly more effective than that of VPA alone. VPA does not antagonize the cytotoxic effects of TMZ. Preincubation with VPA enhances the effect of both γ-radiation and TMZ, in both a TMZ-sensitive and a TMZ-resistant human glioma cell line. VPA combined with TMZ may lead to further enhancement of the radiation response.

Anti-tumour effects by a trimodal combination of temozolomide, meloxicam and X-rays in cultures of human glioma cells.

PURPOSE: To investigate the possible cytotoxic interactions between the chemotherapeutic drug temozolomide (TMZ) and the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor meloxicam (MLC) or of both drugs combined with X-rays in three human glioma cell lines (D384, Hs 683 and U251). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cells were exposed to TMZ (96 hours) and MLC was co-incubated during the last 24 h. Thereafter, cells were irradiated with X-rays and plated for a clonogenic assay. Total cell numbers and the numbers of surviving cells were determined to study the recovery of the cell populations (up until 19 days) following different combinations of TMZ, MLC and X-rays. RESULTS: The combination of MLC and TMZ caused an enhanced cytotoxic effect in D384 and Hs 683. Various treatment combinations demonstrated significant radiation enhancement in all three cell lines. Long-term observations of D384 cells demonstrated that the repopulation rates of the surviving cells are far less affected by the various treatment protocols than those from the non-surviving cells. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that a combination of TMZ and MLC resulted in a significant potentiation of their cytotoxicity in D384 and Hs683. The combination of these two drugs can also cause considerable enhancement of the radiation response in human glioma cell lines, although only D384 cells benefit from trimodal over bimodal treatment.

Differential radiosensitizing potential of temozolomide in MGMT promoter methylated glioblastoma multiforme cell lines.

PURPOSE: To investigate the radiosensitizing potential of temozolomide (TMZ) for human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell lines using single-dose and fractionated gamma-irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three genetically characterized human GBM cell lines (AMC-3046, VU-109, and VU-122) were exposed to various single (0-6 Gy) and daily fractionated doses (2 Gy per fraction) of gamma-irradiation. Repeated TMZ doses were given before and concurrent with irradiation treatment. Immediately plated clonogenic cell-survival curves were determined for both the single-dose and the fractionated irradiation experiments. To establish the net effect of clonogenic cell survival and cell proliferation, growth curves were determined, expressed as the number of surviving cells. RESULTS: All three cell lines showed MGMT promoter methylation, lacked MGMT protein expression, and were sensitive to TMZ. The isotoxic TMZ concentrations used were in a clinically feasible range of 10 micromol/L (AMC-3046), 3 micromol/L (VU-109), and 2.5 micromol/L (VU-122). Temozolomide was able to radiosensitize two cell lines (AMC 3046 and VU-122) using single-dose irradiation. A reduction in the number of surviving cells after treatment with the combination of TMZ and fractionated irradiation was seen in all three cell lines, but only AMC 3046 showed a radiosensitizing effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study on TMZ-sensitive GBM cell lines shows that TMZ can act as a radiosensitizer and is at least additive to gamma-irradiation. Enhancement of the radiation response by TMZ seems to be independent of the epigenetically silenced MGMT gene.

Genetic profiling of a distant second glioblastoma multiforme after radiotherapy: Recurrence or second primary tumor?

OBJECT: In nearly all patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) a local recurrence develops within a short period of time. In this paper the authors describe two patients in whom a second GBM developed after a relatively long time interval at a site remote from the primary tumor. The genetic profiles of the tumors were compared to discriminate between distant recurrence and a second primary tumor. METHODS: Both patients harboring a supratentorial GBM were treated with surgery and local high-dose radiotherapy. Local control of the disease at the primary tumor site was achieved. Within 2 years, a second GBM developed in both patients, not only outside the previously irradiated target areas but infratentorially in one patient and in the opposite hemisphere in the other. The tumors were examined for the presence of several genetic alterations that are frequently found in GBMs--a loss of heterozygosity at chromosome regions 1p36, 10pl5, 19q13, and 22q13, and at the CDKN2A, PTEN, DMBT1, and TP53 gene regions; a TP53 mutation; and EGFR amplification. In the first patient, genetic profiling revealed that the primary tumor had an allelic imbalance for markers in several chromosome regions for which the second tumor displayed a complete loss. In the second patient, genetic profiling demonstrated the presence of genetic changes in the second tumor that were identical with and additional to those found in the primary tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the similarities between the genetic profiles of the primary and the second tumors in these patients, the authors decided that in each case the second distant GBM was a distant recurrence rather than a second independent primary tumor.