Quality of life after combined kidney-pancreas or kidney transplantation in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease.

The quality of life after a successful combined kidney-pancreas transplantation was studied in 17 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and in 11 patients who experienced a failure of one or both grafts. The control group comprised 23 patients who received a kidney transplantation only. The aspects of quality of life chosen for study were: physical, psychological and social wellbeing, daily activities, level of functioning and global quality of life evaluation. Additionally, future expectations, the perceived burden of treatment, and main reason for undergoing organ replacement therapy were evaluated. In only one aspect of quality of life did patients with a successful combined transplantation score significantly better than patients with a kidney transplantation, i.e., mobility in daily functioning and activities (p = 0.03). Patients with a failure of one or both grafts reported significantly more fatigue (p = 0.02), less energy (p = 0.04), and more social isolation (p = 0.05) than patients who had well-functioning grafts. The mean duration of hospitalization following combined transplantation is twice that for kidney transplantation only 10 vs 5 weeks. Although the combined transplantation group found the first 3 months after transplantation more burdensome (p = 0.04) and more often wondered whether it had been worth all the trouble (p = 0.05), they indicated the same willingness as the group with a kidney transplant only to undergo another transplantation under similar circumstances. Although the recipients of a kidney transplant had not been offered the choice of a combined transplantation, their reasons for transplantation did not, in essence, differ from those of recipients of a combined transplantation. In both groups the main motivation to opt for organ replacement therapy was the burden of dialysis, to stop the progressive deterioration of their health, and to experience a better quality of life.

Pancreatic graft survival after arterial thrombosis in simultaneous renal-pancreatic transplantation.

Vascular thrombosis following pancreas transplantation is one of the main causes of early graft loss. Successful thrombectomy after pancreatic graft thrombosis has not been reported yet. A patient with arterial graft thrombosis in whom the graft survived after thrombectomy is described. Different varieties of pancreatic graft thrombosis are discussed.

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: a feasible procedure in selected patients.

We analyzed the overall results of 24 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantations (SPK), performed in our hospital between April 1986 and June 1990. All patients had type I diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failure. We used bladder drainage of the pancreatic exocrine secretions through a duodenocystostomy. The blood vessels of both grafts were anastomosed to the iliac vessels. The immunosuppressive management was triple-therapy with cyclosporin, azathioprine and prednisone. All organs were transplanted without matching donors and recipients for HLA. At the time of transplantation, mean recipient age was 37 yr; the average duration of diabetes was 22 yr. After disappointing results in the first 4 patients, the pancreas was placed intraperitoneally instead of extraperitoneally and the antibiotic drug regimen was altered. In the second group (n = 20), patient survival was 100%; 1-yr pancreas and kidney graft survival were 65 and 62%, respectively. Duration of hospitalization and pancreas and kidney graft loss were positively correlated with the number of rejection episodes. After 1 yr of follow-up, the mean creatinine clearance was 62 ml/min and the mean HbA1c was 5.5%. Blood glucose levels and oral glucose tolerance tests were also normal. We conclude that patient and graft survival after SPK are satisfactory, although rejection-related morbidity is still a major problem.

[Are hematologic reference values applicable to the healthy elderly?]. / Zijn de hematologische referentiewaarden van toepassing op gezonde bejaarden?

In the healthy elderly (65-90 years; 80 men, 75 women) the variability of haematological findings was examined and compared with the reference range. In the men, the ranges for haemoglobin valves (7.4-10.5 mmol/l) and erythrocyte counts (3.8-5.5 x 10(12)/l) proved to be lower than the reference intervals (8.5-10.9 mmol/l and 4.4-6.0 x 10(12)/l respectively). For the women no discrepancies were found. The question arises whether the reference limits for haemoglobin and erythrocytes should be lowered for elderly men.