Continuing the conversation: a cross-sectional study about the effects of work-related adverse events on the mental health of Dutch (resident) obstetrician-gynaecologists (ObGyns).

BACKGROUND: Obstetrician-Gynaecologists (ObGyns) frequently face work-related adverse events such as severe obstetric complications and maternal or neonatal deaths. In 2014, the WATER-1 study showed that ObGyns are at risk of developing work-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), while many hospitals lacked a professional support system. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the current prevalence of work-related traumatic events and mental health problems among Dutch ObGyns, as well as to examine the current and desired support. METHODS: In 2022, an online questionnaire was sent to all members of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG), including resident and attending ObGyns. The survey included questions about experienced work-related events, current and desired coping strategies, and three validated screening questionnaires for anxiety, depression, and PTSD (HADS, TSQ, and PCL-5). RESULTS: The response rate was 18.8% and 343 questionnaires were included in the analysis. Of the respondents, 93.9% had experienced at least one work-related adverse event, 20.1% had faced a complaint from the national disciplinary board, and 49.4% had considered leaving the profession at any moment in their career. The prevalence rates of clinically relevant anxiety, depression, and psychological distress were 14.3, 4.4, and 15.7%, respectively. The prevalence of work-related PTSD was 0.9% according to DSM-IV and 1.2% according to DSM-5. More than half of the respondents (61.3%) reported the presence of a structured support protocol or approach in their department or hospital, and almost all respondents (92.6%) rated it as sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The percentages of anxiety, depression, psychological distress and PTSD are comparable to the similar study performed in 2014. Most Dutch ObGyns experience adverse events at work, which can be perceived as traumatic and, in certain cases, may lead to the development of PTSD. Structured support after adverse work-related events is now available in almost two-thirds of workplaces, and was mostly experienced as good. Despite substantial improvements in the availability and satisfaction of professional support after work-related adverse events, the prevalence rates of mental problems remain considerable, and it is imperative to sustain conversation about the mental well-being of ObGyns.

Unplanned cesarean sections in advanced maternal age: A predictive model.

INTRODUCTION: As maternal age during pregnancy is rising all over the world, there is a growing need for prognostic factors that determine maternal and perinatal outcomes in older women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort study of women aged 40 years or older at the time of delivery in four Santeon hospitals across the Netherlands between January 2016 and December 2019. Outcomes were compared between women of 40-44 years (advanced maternal age) and 45 years and older (very advanced maternal age). Primary outcome was unplanned cesarean section, secondary outcomes included postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal outcomes. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to analyze predictive factors for unplanned cesarean sections in women who attempted vaginal delivery. Subsequently, a predictive model and risk scores were constructed to predict unplanned cesarean section. RESULTS: A cohort of 1660 women was analyzed; mean maternal age was 41.4 years, 4.8% of the women were 45 years and older. In both groups, more than half of the women had not delivered vaginally before. Unplanned cesarean sections were performed in 21.1% of the deliveries in advanced maternal age and in 29.1% in very advanced maternal age. Four predictive factors were significantly correlated with unplanned cesarean sections: higher body mass index (BMI), no previous vaginal delivery, spontaneous start of delivery and number of days needed for cervical priming. A predictive model was constructed from these factors with an area under the curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.78). A sensitivity analysis in nulliparous women proved that BMI, days of cervical priming, age, and gestational age were risk factors, whereas spontaneous start of delivery and induction were protective factors. There was one occurrence of neonatal death. CONCLUSIONS: Women of advanced maternal age and those of very advanced maternal age have a higher chance of having an unplanned cesarean section compared to the general obstetric population in the Netherlands. Unplanned cesarean sections can be predicted through use of our predictive model. Risk increases with higher BMI, no previous vaginal delivery, and increasing number of days needed for cervical priming, whereas spontaneous start of labor lowers the risk. In nulliparous women, age and gestational age also increase risk, but induction lowers the risk of having an unplanned cesarean section.

Pregnancy intention in relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with versus without psychiatric diagnoses.

BACKGROUND: Studies have identified adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes for women with psychiatric disorders. Additionally, psychiatric disorders may pose an increased risk for unintended pregnancies (UPs) which in turn may also impact negatively on outcomes. The present study aims to compare the incidence of UPs in women with versus without current/past psychiatric diagnoses and investigates whether psychiatric history modifies the relation between delivery outcomes in women with and without UPs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was compiled of women who gave birth in a large hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Women ≥18 years old with singleton pregnancies and birth registrations in the electronic patient file during January 1, 2015 to March 1, 2020 were included. Patient characteristics (including pregnancy intention and psychiatric history), maternal (gestational diabetes, mode of delivery) and neonatal outcomes (e.g., gestational age [GA], birthweight and Apgar scores) were registered by health care providers in hospital charts. Incidence of UPs was compared between women with versus without current/past psychiatric diagnoses. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women with versus without UPs with linear or logistic regression models adjusted for relevant confounders with an interaction term for UP with current/past psychiatric diagnoses. RESULTS: We included 1219 women with and 1093 women without current/past psychiatric diagnoses. Current/past psychiatric diagnoses were significantly associated with UPs after adjustment for confounders (39.0% vs. 29.6%, OR 1.56, CI 1.23-2.00, p < 0.001). In sub-analyses, women with depressive (OR 1.67, CI 1.24-2.26, p = 0.001), personality (OR 2.64, CI 1.38-5.11, p = 0.004) and substance-related and addictive disorders (OR 4.29, CI 1.90-10.03, p = 0.001) had higher odds of UPs compared to women without current/past psychiatric diagnoses. Amongst women with UPs, current/past psychiatric diagnoses did not modify maternal or neonatal outcomes, except for GA at delivery as women with both UPs and current/past psychiatric diagnosis had a 2.21-day higher mean GA at delivery than women in the reference group (p-value interaction = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Current/past psychiatric diagnoses are associated with a higher odd of UPs. In our sample, maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable for women with and without UPs and these results were similar for women with and without current/past psychiatric diagnoses, except for GA at delivery. Although our study is limited by several factors, we found that women with current/past psychiatric diagnoses, irrespective of pregnancy planning status, do not have more adverse maternal or pregnancy outcomes. Increased efforts are needed to ensure that psychoeducation and conversations about pregnancy planning and UPs are available for women with current/past psychiatric diagnoses.

Neonatal admission after lithium use in pregnant women with bipolar disorders: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Lithium is the preferred treatment for pregnant women with bipolar disorders (BD), as it is most effective in preventing postpartum relapse. Although it has been prescribed during pregnancy for decades, the safety for neonates and obstetric outcomes are a topic of ongoing scientific debate as previous research has yielded contradicting outcomes. Our study aims to compare (re)admission rates and reasons for admissions in neonates born to women with bipolar disorders (BD) with and without lithium exposure. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a Dutch secondary hospital (two locations in Amsterdam). Women with BD who gave birth after a singleton pregnancy between January 2011 and March 2021 and their neonates were included. Outcomes were obtained by medical chart review of mothers and neonates and compared between neonates with and without lithium exposure. The primary outcome was admission to a neonatal ward with monitoring, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), 5-minute Apgar scores, neonatal asphyxia, and readmission ≤ 28 days. RESULTS: We included 93 women with BD, who gave birth to 117 live-born neonates: 42 (36%) exposed and 75 (64%) non-exposed to lithium. There were no significant differences in neonatal admission with monitoring (16.7 vs. 20.0%, p = 0.844). Additionally, preterm birth (7.1 vs. 5.3%), SGA (0.0 vs. 8.0%), 5-minute Apgar scores (means 9.50 vs. 9.51), neonatal asphyxia (4.8 vs. 2.7%) and readmission (4.8 vs. 5.3%) were comparable. Overall, 18.8% of BD offspring was admitted. Women with BD had high rates of caesarean section (29.1%), gestational diabetes (12.8%) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of neonates all born to women with BD using various other psychotropic drugs, exposure to lithium was not associated with greater risk of neonatal admission to a ward with monitoring compared to non-exposure to lithium, questioning the necessity for special measures after lithium exposure. However, offspring of women with BD was admitted regularly and women with BD have high obstetric risk which require clinical and scientific attention.

Experiences with Family Planning amongst Persons with Mental Health Problems: A Nationwide Patient Survey.

High rates of unintended pregnancies in patients with mental health problems reflect the unmet need for tailored family planning. This study aims to explore aspects of family planning that are especially challenging for patients experiencing health problems by obtaining the perspective of (former) patients and those with close relationships with the (former) patients. In August 2021, members of a Dutch national mental health panel, consisting of (former) patients and close ones, were invited to respond to a 34-question online survey that included questions on four domains: reproductive history, decision making, parenting, and sexuality. This study has revealed the severe and adverse impact of mental health problems across all of the four domains of reproductive health and family planning, which the questions specifically targeted. Based on these results, we recommend discussing family planning with all patients experiencing or at risk for mental health problems and their partners. These discussions should address a desire to have children, (involuntary) childlessness, uncertainties about parenting and sexuality, while remaining considerate of experienced taboos.

Fear of Childbirth in Nulliparous Women.

Purpose: The relation between fear of childbirth (FoC) and gestational age is inconclusive, and self-reported need for help regarding this fear has never been investigated. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and course of FoC according to gestational age, to identify risk factors for the development of FoC, the influence of this fear on preferred mode of delivery, and self-reported need for help. Methods: Nulliparous pregnant women of all gestational ages completed an online survey. The study consisted of a cross-sectional and a longitudinal analysis. Women who completed the survey in the first or second trimester (T0) were approached again in their third trimester (T1). The Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire Version A (W-DEQ A) was used with a cut-off score ≥ 85 to define presence of fear of childbirth. Questionnaires indexing social support, anxiety, symptoms of depression, preferred mode of delivery, and self-reported need for help were included. Results: In total, 364 women were enrolled at T0, and 118 out of 184 eligible women were included in the longitudinal analysis. Point prevalence of FoC at T0 was 18.4% with no significant difference between trimesters. In the longitudinal sample, the prevalence of FoC decreased from 18.6% (T0) to 11.0% (T1), p = 0.004. Although mean scores for FoC decreased significantly, p < 0.001, scores increased in 41 (34.7%) women. The presence of FoC was associated with elevated anxiety, less family support, prenatal care of the obstetrician by choice, preference for a cesarean section, and for pain relief. Women with FoC were more likely to actively seek for help compared to women without FoC. Conclusion: While FoC is common in each trimester, prevalence decreases over the course of pregnancy. Women with FoC are often actively seeking for help, suggesting that this fear should be addressed better, and help should be offered accordingly.

Fear of childbirth in pregnancy was not increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Fear of childbirth is a well-known problem during pregnancy and can have implications for childbirth, including prolonged labor, use of epidural analgesia, obstetric complications, presence of traumatic stress symptoms, or request for an elective cesarean section. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected mental health and therefore could have increased fear of childbirth during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate fear of childbirth during the pandemic in the Netherlands compared with a reference group from before the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate pregnant women during the first and second waves of COVID-19 compared with both each other and with pregnant women from before the pandemic. Participants were recruited through social media platforms, hospitals, and midwifery practices. Pregnant women aged ≥18 years who had mastered the Dutch language were eligible to participate. Fear of childbirth was measured with the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire online using a cut-off score of ≥85 to indicate clinically relevant fear of childbirth. The primary outcome was the prevalence of fear of childbirth. We undertook additional analyses to specifically look at possible effect modification. RESULTS: In total, 1102 pregnant women completed the questionnaire during the first wave of the pandemic, 731 during the second wave, and 364 before the pandemic. Fear of childbirth was present in 10.6%, 11.4%, and 18.4%, respectively. We considered possible effect modification, which indicated that age and parity had a significant influence. In participants during the first wave of COVID-19, nulliparous women had significantly lower odds (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.73; p < 0.01) of having a fear of childbirth than did the reference group. Both younger participants in the first wave (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.37-0.93; p < 0.05) and older participants in the first wave (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.28-0.71; p < 0.01) and the second wave (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.21-0.62; p < 0.01) of COVID-19 had lower odds of fear of childbirth than the reference group. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women during the first and second waves of COVID-19 had lower fear of childbirth scores than pregnant women before the pandemic, indicating less fear of childbirth during the pandemic. This could be explained by an increased level of information, more time to consume information, and better work-life balance with more people working at home during the pandemic.

Therapist perceptions of treating posttraumatic stress disorder in pregnancy: The VIP Study.

There is no consensus on the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during pregnancy, and therapists' views on the matter are largely unknown. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore therapist beliefs and experiences regarding PTSD treatment during pregnancy. Participants were therapists (N = 301) with experience treating PTSD who completed an online survey. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of therapists who were experienced in treating PTSD symptoms during pregnancy; secondary outcome measures assessed preferred treatments for the general and pregnant populations, perceived reluctance to treat PTSD in pregnancy, and perceived effects and adverse events attributed to treatment for pregnant women and fetuses. The majority of participants (n = 246, 81.7%) had experience with treating PTSD during pregnancy. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing was the preferred treatment for both the general and the pregnant populations. Almost half of the sample (48.8%) reported hearing that PTSD treatment in pregnancy could be harmful; 30.5% of therapists were reluctant to treat pregnant women with PTSD. Most therapists observed a clinically relevant posttreatment reduction of PTSD symptoms in pregnant women. Perceived adverse maternal and fetal events attributed to treatment were reported by 8.4% and 1.4% of therapists, respectively. Despite reluctance, most therapists reported treating PTSD during pregnancy. The results show that although therapists often reported hearing that treating PTSD during pregnancy was harmful, only a small percentage reported perceived adverse events, and treatment was often viewed as effective. These findings implicate a more positive view on the treatment of PTSD in pregnancy.

Healthy and preeclamptic pregnancies show differences in Guanylate-Binding Protein-1 plasma levels.

The large interferon-inducible anti-angiogenic pro-inflammatory GTPase Guanylate Binding Protein-1 (GBP-1) is produced and secreted by activated endothelial cells and is highly induced by inflammatory cytokines and inhibited by angiogenic growth factors. During pregnancy a generalized mild inflammatory response is observed. During preeclampsia this generalized inflammatory response is even further activated and activation of the endothelium occurs. We hypothesized that GBP-1 is increased in healthy pregnancy and will be even further increased during preeclampsia. In the first experiment, plasma and placentas were collected from healthy and preeclamptic pregnancies. Plasma was also collected from non-pregnant women. For the second experiment longitudinal blood samples from women with a healthy or preeclamptic pregnancy were collected from the end of the first trimester until birth and one sample postpartum. The plasma GBP-1 levels were measured by ELISA and GBP-1 mRNA and protein levels in the placenta were tested by qPCR and immunohistochemistry. During pregnancy higher plasma concentrations of GBP-1 compared with non-pregnant women were observed. Surprisingly, during preeclampsia, plasma GBP-1 levels were lower than in control pregnancies and similar to the level of non-pregnant controls. Placental GBP-1 mRNA levels were not different between healthy and preeclamptic pregnancies and GBP-1 protein was virtually undetectable in the trophoblast by immunohistochemistry in placental tissue. Evaluation of longitudinal samples showed that plasma GBP-1 concentrations increased towards the end of pregnancy in healthy pregnancies, but not in preeclampsia. In line with our hypothesis, we found higher GBP-1 plasma levels during healthy pregnancy. However, plasma GBP-1 did not further increase during preeclampsia, but was stable. Further studies are needed to evaluate why GBP-1 does not increase during preeclampsia.

Adverse maternal and perinatal pregnancy outcomes related to very advanced maternal age in primigravida and multigravida in the Netherlands: A population-based cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The age at which women give birth is rising steadily in the western world. Advanced maternal age has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We assessed the association between advanced maternal age and the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcome in primigravid and multigravid women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was a population-based cohort study and included women giving birth between January 2000 and December 2018 using data from the Dutch perinatal registration of Perined. Women were divided into age groups. We compared outcomes between women of 40-44, 45-49, and over 50 years old (the study groups) with women of 25-29 years old (reference group), stratified for parity. We employed multivariable regression to correct for possible confounders including methods of conception, multiple pregnancies, ethnicity, and socio-economic status. Our primary outcomes were maternal and perinatal mortality. Secondary outcomes included common maternal and perinatal complications, as well as cesarean section rate. RESULTS: A cohort of 3 700 326 women gave birth during the study period. Of these women, 3.2% were above 40 years of age. Maternal mortality was rare in all groups, but significantly higher in multigravid women over 50 years old. Perinatal mortality was significantly higher in all pregnancies of women over 40 years old, but not for primigravida over 50 years old. The most notable results with the steepest increase were in maternal complications. Both primigravida and multigravida over 40 years old were at a two times higher risk of perinatal mortality, cesarean section, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders, and a low Apgar score after 5 minutes. The risk for women over 45 was almost tripled for perinatal mortality and gestational diabetes and six times higher for cesarean section. Women over 50 years old had a seven times higher risk of cesarean section, a four times higher risk of gestational diabetes, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal intensive care unit admission, and a 10 times higher risk of hypertensive disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes for women over 40 years old surges as age increases. A novel aspect was the consistent increased risks not only for primigravid women but also for multigravida.

Severe postpartum hemorrhage increases risk of posttraumatic stress disorder: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a risk factor for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Severe PPH can be experienced as a traumatic event. PTSD leads to negative mental health effects. Knowing risk factors for PTSD during childbirth offers opportunities for early interventions, which may prevent the development of PTSD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, we compared two groups of participants; women with ≥2000 mL of blood loss (severe PPH, patients) and women with ≤500 mL of blood loss (controls). Participants were screened for PTSD using the PCL-5 four to six weeks after delivery. Positive screening was followed by the CAPS-5 to diagnose PTSD. RESULTS: We included 187 PPH patients and 121 controls. Median PCL-5 scores were higher for PPH patients (5.0) than controls (4.0, p = 0.005). Thirteen PPH patients (7.0%) and two controls (1.7%) scored ≥32 on the PCL-5, indicative of probable PTSD (OR 4.45, 95% CI 0.99-20.06, p = 0.035). Significant more PPH patients than controls met criteria for a clinical diagnosis of PTSD on the CAPS-5 (n = 10, 5.6% vs n = 0, 0.0%; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant and clinically relevant increased risk for developing PTSD after severe PPH. Gynecologists and midwives are advised to screen for PTSD at postpartum follow-up visits to prevent long-term negative mental health effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL50273.100.14.

Perinatal death in a term fetal growth restriction randomized controlled trial: the paradox of prior risk and consent.

BACKGROUND: The disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term was an intention to treat analysis and compared labor induction with expectant monitoring in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction at term and showed equivalence for neonatal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trial participation bias and to examine the generalizability of the results of an obstetrical randomized trial. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from participants and nonparticipants of a randomized controlled trial-the disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (n=1116) -to perform a secondary analysis. This study compared induction of labor and expectant management in women with term growth restriction. Data were collected in the same manner for both groups. Baseline characteristics and neonatal and maternal outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was a composite measure of adverse neonatal outcome. Secondary outcomes were delivery by cesarean delivery and instrumental vaginal delivery; length of stay in the neonatal intensive care, neonatal ward, and the maternal hospital; and maternal morbidity. RESULTS: Nonparticipants were older, had a lower body mass index, had a higher level of education, smoked less, and preferred expectant management. The time between study inclusion and labor onset was shorter in participants than in nonparticipants. Notably, 4 perinatal deaths occurred among nonparticipants and none among participants. Among nonparticipants, there were more children born with a birthweight below the third centile. The nonparticipants who had expectant management were monitored less frequently than the participants in both the intervention and the expectant arm. CONCLUSION: We found less favorable outcomes and more perinatal deaths in nonparticipants. Protocol-driven management, differences between participants and nonparticipants, or the fact that nonparticipants had a preference for expectant management might explain the findings.

The effects of PTSD treatment during pregnancy: systematic review and case study.

BACKGROUND: PTSD in pregnant women is associated with adverse outcomes for mothers and their children. It is unknown whether pregnant women with PTSD, or symptoms of PTSD, can receive targeted treatment that is safe and effective. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present paper was to assess the effectiveness and safety of treatment for (symptoms of) PTSD in pregnant women. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines in Pubmed, Embase, PsychINFO, and Cochrane. In addition, a case is presented of a pregnant woman with PTSD who received eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy aimed at processing the memories of a previous distressing childbirth. RESULTS: In total, 13 studies were included, involving eight types of interventions (i.e. trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy, exposure therapy, EMDR therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, explorative therapy, self-hypnosis and relaxation, Survivor Moms Companion, and Seeking Safety Intervention). In three studies, the traumatic event pertained to a previous childbirth. Five studies reported obstetrical outcomes. After requesting additional information, authors of five studies indicated an absence of serious adverse events. PTSD symptoms improved in 10 studies. However, most studies carried a high risk of bias. In our case study, a pregnant woman with a PTSD diagnosis based on DSM-5 no longer fulfilled the criteria of PTSD after three sessions of EMDR therapy. She had an uncomplicated pregnancy and delivery. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that case studies as the one presented here report no adverse events, and treatment is likely safe, due to the poor methodological quality of most studies it is impossible to allow inferences on the effects of any particular treatment of PTSD (symptoms) during pregnancy. Yet, given the elevated maternal stress and cortisol levels in pregnant women with PTSD, and the fact that so far no adverse effects on the unborn child have been reported associated with the application of trauma-focused therapy, treatment of PTSD during pregnancy is most likely safe.

Antecedentes: El TEPT en mujeres embarazadas se asocia con consecuencias adversas para las madres y sus hijos. Se desconoce si las mujeres que están embarazadas y sufren de TEPT, o síntomas de TEPT, pueden recibir un tratamiento dirigido que sea seguro y efectivo.Objetivo: El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar la efectividad y la seguridad del tratamiento para (síntomas de) TEPT en mujeres embarazadas.Método: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de acuerdo con las directrices PRISMA en Pubmed, Embase, PsychINFO y Cochrane. Además, se presenta un caso de una mujer embarazada con TEPT que recibió terapia de desensibilización y reprocesamiento por movimientos oculares (EMDR) destinada a procesar los recuerdos de un parto traumático anterior.Resultados: En total, se incluyeron 13 estudios, que incluyeron ocho tipos de intervenciones (es decir, terapia cognitivo conductual centrada en el trauma, terapia de exposición, terapia EMDR, psicoterapia interpersonal, terapia exploratoria, autohipnosis y relajación, Compañera de madres sobrevivientes e intervención de Búsqueda de Seguridad). En tres estudios, el evento traumático pertenecía a un parto previo. Cinco estudios informaron consecuencias obstétricas. Después de solicitar información adicional, los autores de cinco estudios indicaron la ausencia de eventos adversos graves. Los síntomas de TEPT mejoraron en diez estudios. Sin embargo, la mayoría de los estudios conllevaban un alto riesgo de sesgo. En nuestro estudio de caso, una mujer embarazada con diagnóstico de TEPT basado en DSM-5 ya no cumplía los criterios de TEPT después de tres sesiones de terapia EMDR. Ella tuvo un embarazo y parto sin complicaciones.Conclusión: Debido a la mala calidad metodológica de la mayoría de los estudios, es imposible permitir inferencias sobre los efectos de cualquier tratamiento particular de TEPT (síntomas) durante el embarazo. Sin embargo, dado el elevado nivel de estrés materno y los niveles de cortisol en mujeres embarazadas con TEPT, y el hecho de que hasta ahora no se han reportado efectos adversos en el feto asociados con la aplicación de terapia centrada en el trauma, el tratamiento del TEPT durante el embarazo es muy seguro.

Potential traumatic events in the workplace and depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress: a cross-sectional study among Dutch gynaecologists, paediatricians and orthopaedic surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of work-related potential traumatic events (PTEs), support protocols and mental health symptoms across Dutch gynaecologists, orthopaedic surgeons and paediatricians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, supplementary analysis of combined data. SETTING: Nationwide survey between 2014 and 2017. PARTICIPANTS: An online questionnaire was sent to all Dutch gynaecologists, orthopaedic surgeons and paediatricians, including resident physicians (4959 physicians). 1374 questionnaires were eligible for analysis, corresponding with a response rate of 27.7%. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were the prevalence of work-related PTEs, depression, anxiety, psychological distress and traumatic stress, measured with validated screening instruments (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Trauma Screening Questionnaire). Secondary outcomes were the association of mental health and defensive practice to traumatic events and support protocols. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 20.8% experienced a work-related PTE at least 4 weeks ago. Prevalence rates indicative of depression, anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were 6.4%, 13.6% and 1.5%, respectively. Depression (9.2% vs 5.2%, p=0.019), anxiety (18.2% vs 8.2%, p<0.001) and psychological distress (22.8% vs 12.5%, p<0.001) were significantly more prevalent in female compared with male attendings. The absence of a support protocol was significantly associated with more probable PTSD (p=0.022). Those who witnessed a PTE, reported more defensive work changes (28.0% vs 20.5%, p=0.007) and those with probable PTSD considered to quit medical work more often (60.0% vs 35.8%, p=0.032). CONCLUSION: Physicians are frequently exposed to PTEs with high emotional impact over the course of their career. Lacking a support protocol after adverse events was associated with more post-traumatic stress. Adverse events were associated with considering to quit medical practice and a more defensive practice. More awareness must be created for the mental health of physicians as well as for the implementation of a well-organised support system after PTEs.

Breech deliveries in OLVG, the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study of seven years.

BACKGROUND: The clinical dilemma on the preferred mode of delivery for breech position still exists. Elective caesarean delivery (CD) could be safer for neonates, whereas vaginal breech delivery (VBD) remains a safe option when conducted by an experienced person. Besides successful VBD is beneficial for mothers and subsequent pregnancies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate breech deliveries on mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A single center, retrospective, cohort study was performed of women who delivered a singleton fetus in breech position from 32 weeks' gestation onwards from January 2011 to December 2017. Primary outcome measure was mode of delivery defined as an elective CD and planned VBD. Secondary outcome measures were neonatal and maternal outcome. For neonatal outcome, we used neonatal mortality and a composite measure neonatal morbidity. Maternal outcome included maternal mortality and maternal morbidity divided in severe and non-severe complications. We subcategorized for preterm (32 weeks to 37 weeks of gestation) and term pregnancies (from 37 weeks of gestation onwards). RESULTS: 1.774 women delivered a child in breech position, 73 % opted for an elective CD. Of the 484 women that had a planned VBD (preterm 38 % (n = 59), term 26 % (n = 425)) 71 % were successful. Neonatal mortality occurred twice in the VBD cohort. Preterm neonatal morbidity occurred in the elective CD and VBD cohort equally (both 66 %), at term significantly more in the VBD cohort (12 % v 4%, OR 3.2, 95 % CI 2.1-4.8). For the total cohort, severe maternal postpartum complications occurred more often in the elective CD compared to successful VBD (2% v 0.3 %, OR 6.0, 95 % CI 0.80-44.3). CONCLUSION: A high rate of successful VBD after opting for a planned VBD was found in our center. Nevertheless, compromised neonatal outcome at term was more frequent in the planned VBD group compared to the elective CD group. Severe maternal postpartum complications were more frequent in the elective CD group compared to the VBD group. Future research should focus alternations in the management of breech presentation.

Posttraumatic stress disorder in partners following severe postpartum haemorrhage: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Partners of women are increasingly present during childbirth and may be exposed to a traumatic experience. Since parents' mental health issues (i.e. posttraumatic stress disorder) have been shown to increase the risk of problems in the child's development, it is important to identify these risk factors. Partners often describe severe postpartum haemorrhage as traumatic. AIM: Whether witnessing severe postpartum haemorrhage is a risk factor for developing posttraumatic stress disorder in partners. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we compared partners of women with severe postpartum haemorrhage (≥2000 mL) and partners of women with ≤500 mL of blood loss (controls). Four weeks after birth partners were screened for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms with a self-report questionnaire. Scores ≥11 were followed by a gold standard clinical interview to diagnose posttraumatic stress disorder. FINDINGS: We included 123 severe postpartum haemorrhage partners and 62 control partners. Partners of women with severe postpartum haemorrhage reported higher scores than control partners (median 3.0 (0.0-7.0) vs 2.0 (0.0-4.0), p = 0.04) on symptoms of posttraumatic stress, but no significant difference in probable posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis according to the self-report questionnaire was found. According to the clinical interview no partners were diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder. Severe postpartum haemorrhage was experienced as traumatic by the partners who felt excluded. CONCLUSION: None of the partners developed posttraumatic stress disorder, revealing the resilience of young fathers. Because some partners reported severe postpartum haemorrhage as traumatic, we recommend sufficient information and support is provided during childbirth.

Screening for trauma and anxiety recognition: knowledge, management and attitudes amongst gynecologists regarding women with fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder.

Objective: Fear of childbirth (FoC) and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder (PP-PTSD) are often less well recognized by healthcare professionals than other peripartum mental health disorders. This study aims to evaluate knowledge, management and attitudes of gynecologists and gynecology residents regarding women with FoC and PP-PTSD.Study design: A cross-sectional study was conducted among gynecologists and gynecology residents using an online questionnaire. An invitation was sent to all 1401 members of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.Results: Two hundred forty-four respondents completed the online multiple-choice and open question survey. More respondents were able to answer the questions about risk factors, signs/symptoms and consequences of FoC in comparison with similar questions about PP-PTSD. When asked about performing a cesarean section on maternal request, 74% of respondents would grant this request if fear would persist despite adequate psychological treatment. During labor, providing good explanations and obtaining informed consent were most frequently named to reduce fear or the likelihood of a traumatic birth experience. Caregivers' attitudes towards women with FoC or suspected PP-PTSD were mainly positive.Conclusions: Further knowledge, in particular about PP-PTSD, is desirable for appropriate recognition of women with FoC and PP-PTSD. Gynecologists should be made more aware of how their communication is perceived by patients, given the discrepancy between patients' experiences and the attitudes gynecologists report themselves. For optimizing the organization of care, we would recommend the use of a clear (inter)national policy regarding maternal requests for cesarean section (CS).Brief rationaleThe objective of this study was to evaluate knowledge and awareness regarding fear of childbirth (FOC) and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder (PP-PTSD) among gynecologists and gynecology residents, assessing their attitudes towards women suffering from these conditions, and evaluating organization of care.The main findings and recommendations of the study include that gynecologists should be better trained to appropriately recognize fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder, and they should be made more aware of how their communication is perceived by patients, given the discrepancy between patients' experiences and the attitudes gynecologists report themselves.

Midwives' practices and knowledge about fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder.

BACKGROUND: Women suffering from fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder are often not recognised by health care professionals. AIM: To evaluate practices, knowledge and the attitudes of midwives towards women with fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed amongst midwives who work in community practices and hospitals in the Netherlands with the use of a questionnaire purposefully designed for this research aim. FINDINGS: 257 midwives participated in the study, of whom 217 completed all items in the questionnaire. Midwives were better equipped to answer knowledge questions concerning fear of childbirth than posttraumatic stress disorder (regarding symptomatology, risk factors, consequences and treatment). When tending to women with fear of childbirth or (suspected) postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder, most midwives referred to another caregiver (e.g. psychologist). Most midwives expressed a positive and compassionate attitude towards women with fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder. DISCUSSION: The majority of midwives are well informed with respect to fear of childbirth, but knowledge of important aspects of postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder is often lacking. Midwives report no crucial issues related to their attitudes towards women with fear of childbirth and posttraumatic stress disorder. Most midwives provide adequate organisation of care and support. CONCLUSION: Midwives should acquire more in depth knowledge of fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder. This can be achieved by including the two conditions in the program of midwifery education.