ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: - Inappropriate laboratory test ordering has been shown to be as high as 30%. This can have an important impact on quality of care and costs because of downstream consequences such as additional diagnostics, repeat testing, imaging, prescriptions, surgeries, or hospital stays. OBJECTIVE: - To evaluate the effect of computerized clinical decision support systems on appropriateness of laboratory test ordering. DATA SOURCES: - We used MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Inspec through December 2015. Investigators independently screened articles to identify randomized trials that assessed a computerized clinical decision support system aimed at improving laboratory test ordering by providing patient-specific information, delivered in the form of an on-screen management option, reminder, or suggestion through a computerized physician order entry using a rule-based or algorithm-based system relying on an evidence-based knowledge resource. Investigators extracted data from 30 papers about study design, various study characteristics, study setting, various intervention characteristics, involvement of the software developers in the evaluation of the computerized clinical decision support system, outcome types, and various outcome characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: - Because of heterogeneity of systems and settings, pooled estimates of effect could not be made. Data showed that computerized clinical decision support systems had little or no effect on clinical outcomes but some effect on compliance. Computerized clinical decision support systems targeted at laboratory test ordering for multiple conditions appear to be more effective than those targeted at a single condition.
Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Information Systems/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Decision Making, Computer-Assisted , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Clinical Laboratory Information Systems/economics , Clinical Laboratory Information Systems/standards , Clinical Laboratory Services/economics , Clinical Laboratory Services/standards , Clinical Laboratory Services/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While palliative care is still often viewed as care for the final stage of life provided usually by specialist health care professionals, ideally, a palliative care approach would start at an earlier stage, with an important role being assigned to the family physician (FP). However, the description of what the FP's tasks would be in the integration of a palliative care approach into the care continuum remains vague. OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of FPs, nurses and patients about the tasks of the FP in palliative care for people with a life-limiting illness from diagnosis onwards. METHODS: We performed 18 interviews with people with cancer, organ failure or dementia and 6 focus groups, 4 with FPs and 2 with community nurses. Analysis was guided by a thematic content analysis procedure to categorize perceived tasks into overarching themes. RESULTS: The tasks attributed to the FP could be categorized into four roles: FP as (i) available medical expert, (ii) communicator, (iii) collaborator and (iv) life-long learner committed to improving their palliative care competencies by training. Some perceived tasks varied depending on the different phases of illness (such as around diagnosis), while others were applicable throughout the whole illness course. Participants mostly had the same perception of the FPs' tasks, but there was disagreement on, for example, the timing of care planning. CONCLUSION: Our results help to elucidate the tasks and roles required of FPs to make integration of a palliative care approach into the care continuum possible.
