Tacrolimus monitoring in renal transplantation: a comparison between high-performance liquid chromatography and immunoassay.

It is recommended that specific methods of tacrolimus monitoring rather than immunoassays, which overestimate tacrolimus levels, should be used in transplant recipients. Direct comparison of these techniques, however, has not been conducted in renal transplantation. In this study, 40 renal transplant recipients with tacrolimus monitoring by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA; target trough level 10 to 15 ng/mL) were compared with 40 patients monitored by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS; target trough level 8 to 13 ng/mL). All patients received anti CD25 antibody induction and mycophenolate mofetil in a steroid-sparing protocol. No differences were seen between MEIA and HPLC-MS groups in patient demographics. All patients were followed for 6 months. Patient survival was 100% in both groups; graft survival was 100% in the MEIA group and 97.5% in the HPLC-MS group. The groups did not differ in the number of dose changes required in the first 6 months or in the number of patients displaying tacrolimus levels within target range at 3 and 6 months. Delayed graft function occurred in 14 patients in the MEIA group and 12 patients in the HPLC-MS group (P = NS). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in four patients in the MEIA group and one patient in the HPLC-MS group (P < .2). No differences were seen for the following parameters at 3 or 6 months: biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity, serum creatinine or estimated creatinine clearance, systolic or diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, cytomegalovirus disease, posttransplant diabetes, or tremor. This study suggests that renal transplantation with HPLC-MS monitoring of tacrolimus is safe and effective.

Steroid sparing in renal transplantation with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil: three-year results.

Although renal transplantation with a 7-day steroid-sparing regimen, tacrolimus and mycophenolate, is associated with good short-term outcomes, late allograft dysfunction and failure remain concerns. In this study 101 consecutive patients underwent renal transplantation using this immunosuppressive regimen. In addition, anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody was used in 25 high-risk patients (regrafts, two-antigen human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR mismatch or sensitized with anti-HLA panel reactivity >30%). After a median follow-up of 39 months (range 29 to 49), overall patient survival is 98%, with two cardiac deaths. Three other graft losses occurred, one each to early venous thrombosis, polyoma viral nephropathy, and late rejection due to noncompliance. Therefore, overall graft survival is 95%. The acute rejection rate at 6 and 12 months was 19% (no rejection occurred between months 6 and 12). Late rejection was uncommon, with only two further episodes beyond 12 months. Mean creatinine at 12 months was 144 micromol/L and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 55 mL/min. Graft function was stable at 3 years with a mean creatinine of 142 micromol/L and mean estimated GFR 56 mL/min. During the study, five patients developed posttransplant diabetes mellitus (two cases beyond 12 months). Tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus disease and BK viral nephropathy each occurred in three patients, with all episodes in the first 12 months. Mean weight gain is 3.3 kg and mean blood pressure is 135/81 on an average of 1.5 antihypertensive agents. This steroid-avoidance regimen is associated with excellent medium-term patient and graft outcomes and a low incidence of side effects.

Five-year results of kidney transplantation under tacrolimus-based regimes: the persisting significance of vascular rejection.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection has been the major risk factor for medium-term kidney graft loss because of chronic allograft nephropathy. We investigated whether the use of improved immunosuppression has altered the relationship between acute and chronic rejection by analyzing data from 245 renal transplant patients receiving Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. RESULTS: Five-year graft survival (censored for death with functioning graft) was 88.8% with no significant difference between living and cadaveric kidney transplants. The only significant predictor of medium-term graft loss was acute vascular rejection. CONCLUSION: Under Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, the occurrence of acute interstitial rejection, even when occurring late, repeatedly, or with failure of graft function to return to baseline, was not associated with chronic allograft nephropathy or medium-term graft loss. Vascular rejection remains the major immunological obstacle to long-term transplant success. Five-year overall survival rates with a functioning graft of 80% with 90% graft survival censored for death with function seem to be realistic and achievable goals.