The burden of abdominal pain after bariatric surgery in terms of diagnostic testing: the OPERATE study.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain after bariatric surgery (BS) is frequently observed. Despite numerous diagnostic tests, the cause of abdominal pain is not always found. OBJECTIVES: To quantify type and number of diagnostic tests performed in patients with abdominal pain after BS and evaluate the burden and their yield in the diagnostic process. SETTING: A bariatric center in the Netherlands. METHODS: In this prospective study, we included patients who presented with abdominal pain after BS between December 1, 2020, and December 1, 2021. All diagnostic tests and reoperations performed during one episode of abdominal pain were scored using a standardized protocol. RESULTS: A total of 441 patients were included; 401 (90.9%) were female, median time after BS was 37.0 months (IQR, 11.0-66.0) and mean percentage total weight loss was 31.41 (SD, 10.53). In total, 715 diagnostic tests were performed, of which 355 were abdominal CT scans, 155 were ultrasounds, and 106 were gastroscopies. These tests yielded a possible explanation for the pain in 40.2% of CT scans, 45.3% of ultrasounds, and 34.7% of gastroscopies. The diagnoses of internal herniation, ileus, and nephrolithiasis generally required only 1 diagnostic test, whereas patients with anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and constipation required several tests before diagnosis. Even after several negative tests, a diagnosis was still found in the subsequent test: 86.7% of patients with 5 or more tests had a definitive diagnoses. Reoperations were performed in 37.2% of patients. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic burden in patients with abdominal pain following BS is high. The most frequently performed diagnostic test is an abdominal CT scan, yielding the highest number of diagnoses in these patients.

A Prospective Study on the Diagnoses for Abdominal Pain After Bariatric Surgery: The OPERATE Study.

PURPOSE: Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery (BS) reveals high numbers of patients with abdominal pain that often remains unexplained. The aim of this prospective study was to give an overview of diagnoses for abdominal pain, percentage of unexplained complaints, number and yield of follow-up visits, and time to establish a diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who visited the Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, The Netherlands, between December 2020 and December 2021 for abdominal pain after BS, were eligible and followed throughout the entire episode of abdominal pain. Distinction was made between presumed and definitive diagnoses. RESULTS: The study comprised 441 patients with abdominal pain; 401 (90.9%) females, 380 (87.7%) had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, mean (SD) % total weight loss was 31.4 (10.5), and median (IQR) time after BS was 37.0 (11.0-66.0) months. Most patients had 1-5 follow-up visits. Readmissions and reoperations were present in 212 (48.1%) and 164 (37.2%) patients. At the end of the episode, 88 (20.0%) patients had a presumed diagnosis, 183 (41.5%) a definitive diagnosis, and 170 (38.5%) unexplained complaints. Most common definitive diagnoses were cholelithiasis, ulcers, internal herniations, and presumed diagnoses irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome, and constipation. Median (IQR) time to presumed diagnoses, definitive diagnoses, or unexplained complaints was 16.0 (3.8-44.5), 2.0 (0.0-31.5), and 13.5 (1.0-53.8) days (p < 0.001). Patients with IBS more often had unexplained complaints (OR 95%CI: 4.457 [1.455-13.654], p = 0.009). At the end, 71 patients (16.1%) still experienced abdominal pain. CONCLUSION: Over a third of abdominal complaints after BS remains unexplained. Most common diagnoses were cholelithiasis, ulcers, and internal herniations.

Lack of benefit of active preparation compared with a clear fluid-only diet in small-bowel visualization for video capsule endoscopy: results of a randomized, blinded, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Controversy remains regarding the type and amount of precapsule bowel cleansing required for small-bowel video capsule endoscopy (VCE). This study aims to assess the efficacy and tolerance of 2 active preparations and a control group of clear fluids only. METHODS: Patients with clinical indications for VCE were randomized to (1) clear fluids only the evening before VCE, (2) 2 sachets of sodium picosulfate plus magnesium sulfate (P/MC) the evening before, or (3) 2 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) the evening before. Diet instructions were the same for all 3 groups. Small-bowel cleansing was assessed in 3 ways: a 5-point ordinal scale (primary outcome), the percentage of time the small-bowel view was clear, and a validated computerized assessment of cleansing. RESULTS: In total, 198 patients were randomized and 175 patients completed the trial with a mean age of 49.2 years. There was no clear benefit of active preparation with either P/MC or PEG over clear fluids only in the overall 5-point rating scale or in the distal fourth of each examination. There was no difference in diagnostic yield between groups. Significant differences were seen concerning tolerance of the preparations, with a higher proportion rating it as easy or very easy in the clear fluids-only group (93%) and the P/MC group (67%) than in the PEG group (13%) (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Small-bowel cleansing for VCE remains a controversial topic. This randomized control trial demonstrates no benefit in overall or distal small-bowel visualization with active preparation using either PEG or P/MC compared with clear fluids only. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00677794.).

Small bowel imaging in celiac disease.

BACKGROUND: Modern small bowel imaging techniques allow detailed depiction of small-intestinal abnormalities. The role of these techniques in the investigation of celiac disease is increasing, especially in patients with suspected complicated celiac disease. KEY MESSAGES: In general, there is no need for radiological small bowel imaging in uncomplicated celiac disease. It is however important that clinicians and radiologists are aware of certain specific radiological findings that may suggest celiac disease, especially since celiac disease is often not considered in adult patients, and small bowel radiology may be performed before specific tests for celiac disease. Radiological abnormalities can be observed with both conventional small bowel radiology studies, like small bowel follow-through or double-contrast small bowel enteroclysis, and newer modalities, like computed tomography or magnetic resonance enterography or enteroclysis. These signs include a decreased number of jejunal folds, an increased number of ileal folds, small bowel dilatation, wall thickening and intussusception. Extraintestinal abnormalities include mesenteric lymphadenopathy, vascular changes and splenic atrophy. Abnormalities congruent with refractory celiac disease type II include a severe decrease in jejunal folds, infiltration of the mesenteric fat and thickening of the small bowel wall. Additionally, a severely decreased splenic volume may indicate complicated celiac disease. Malignant complications of celiac disease, such as enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma and small-intestinal adenocarcinoma, can be reliably investigated with cross-sectional enteroclysis techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Small bowel imaging and especially cross-sectional enteroclysis techniques are important extensions to the diagnostic workup of clinicians involved in the care of patients with celiac disease, especially those with suspected complicated disease.

Double-duct sign: do not forget the gallstones.

A double-duct sign is the combined dilatation of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct, often caused by cancer of the pancreas. We present a patient with colicky pain in the right upper quadrant of her abdomen. On radiological imaging and endosonography, she had a double-duct sign due to choledocholithiasis and no mass in the pancreatic head. A literature search was performed, which indicated that in selected patients with a higher likelihood of pancreas cancer (for example jaundice or pancreatic mass on radiological imaging) up to 85% of patients do indeed have a pancreatic cancer. In an unselected population, regardless of presenting symptoms, a double-duct sign on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was caused by a pancreas malignancy in 58% of patients. In selected patients without jaundice but with a double duct sign, pancreas cancer was only seen in 6% of patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the double-duct sign observed by ERCP for pancreatic cancer varies between 50-76% and 63-80%, respectively. Our patient with symptomatic choledocholithiasis underwent an uncomplicated ERCP with stone extraction and papillotomy and was referred for a cholecystectomy.

Comparison of MR enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MR enteroclysis and to compare it to video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in the analysis of suspected small-bowel disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 77 patients who underwent both MR enteroclysis and VCE and compared the findings of these studies with the findings of enteroscopy, surgery, or with the results of clinical follow-up lasting ≥2 years. RESULTS: Findings included malignant neoplasms (n = 13), benign neoplasms (n = 10), refractory celiac disease (n = 4), Crohn's disease (n = 2) and miscellaneous conditions (n = 10). Specificity of MR enteroclysis was higher than that of VCE (0.97 vs. 0.84, P = 0.047), whereas sensitivity was similar (0.79 vs. 0.74, P = 0.591). In 2/32 (6.3%) patients with both negative VCE and negative MR enteroclysis a positive diagnosis was established, compared to 5/11 (45.5%) patients in whom VCE was positive and MR enteroclysis was negative (likelihood ratio 8.1; P = 0.004), 9/11 (81.8%) patients in whom MR enteroclysis was positive and VCE was negative (likelihood ratio 23.5; P < 0.0001), and all 23 patients in whom both VCE and MR enteroclysis showed abnormalities (likelihood ratio 60.8; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: VCE and MR enteroclysis are complementary modalities. In our study-population, MR enteroclysis was more specific than VCE, while both produced the same sensitivity.

Video capsule endoscopy in patients with nonresponsive celiac disease.

GOALS AND BACKGROUND: Discriminating between patients with nonresponsive but otherwise uncomplicated celiac disease (CD) and patients with refractory celiac disease (RCD) and/or lymphoma is difficult, especially as many abnormalities encountered in complicated CD are not within reach of conventional gastroduodenoscopy. We aimed to describe video capsule endoscopy (VCE) findings in patients with CD and persisting or relapsing symptoms despite a gluten-free diet and to identify VCE findings associated with poor prognosis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 48 VCE studies performed in adult patients with CD because of persisting or relapsing symptoms despite adherence to a gluten-free diet. Patients with either uncomplicated CD or RCD type I were considered to have a good prognosis, whereas patients with either RCD type II or enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma were considered to have a poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify VCE findings independently associated with either good or poor prognosis. RESULTS: Proximal focal erythema (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-38.7; P=0.033) and absence of progression of the capsule to the distal intestine (odds ratio, 16.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-224.9; P=0.035) were independently associated with poor prognosis. Of the 28 patients with none of these 2 features, none died during follow-up, compared with 2 (13.3%) of the 15 patients with one of both features, and 4 (80.0%) of the 5 patients with both the features. CONCLUSIONS: VCE is a minimally invasive endoscopic modality that could be of use in identifying patients with nonresponsive CD who are at risk of poor prognosis.

Video capsule endoscopy for previous overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in patients using anti-thrombotic drugs.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Little is known about the causes of overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) in patients using anti-thrombotic therapy. We aimed to describe video capsule endoscopy (VCE) findings and to identify factors associated with positive findings in these patients. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of 56 patients who underwent VCE for evaluation of previous overt OGIB during anti-thrombotic therapy. VCE studies were re-evaluated by a gastroenterologist blinded to clinical details. Clinical data included in the multivariate analysis were sex, age, indication for and type of anti-thrombotic therapy, hemodynamic instability on admission, type of blood loss, hemoglobin on admission, use of a proton pump inhibitor, NSAID use, time between bleeding episodes and VCE, and whether or not anti-thrombotic therapy was resumed before the VCE study. RESULTS: A probable cause for gastrointestinal bleeding was identified in 28 (50%) of the 56 studies. Angiodysplasia was found in 19 patients. Twenty-two studies showed a possible cause in the small bowel. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that reinstitution of anti-thrombotic therapy before VCE was carried out was the only independent predictor of positive VCE findings (OR: 8.61, 95% CI: 1.20-60.42, P=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Small intestinal angiodysplasia was the most common cause for overt OGIB. Reinstitution of withdrawn anti-thrombotic drugs before the VCE examination was carried out was associated with positive VCE findings in multivariate analysis.

MR enteroclysis in refractory celiac disease: proposal and validation of a severity scoring system.

PURPOSE: To determine magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis findings in patients with uncomplicated celiac disease (CD), refractory CD (RCD) type I, and RCD type II, to develop and validate a scoring system to identify patients with RCD II and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MR enteroclysis to detect CD-related malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed with approval of the institutional review board. One radiologist blinded to clinical details retrospectively evaluated quantitative and qualitative criteria of 28 studies obtained in symptomatic patients with CD (uncomplicated CD, n = 10; RCD I, n = 8; RCD II, n = 10). A scoring system was developed by using parameters identified in multivariate analysis to be associated with RCD II, which two radiologists evaluated in a second group of 40 symptomatic patients with CD. Accuracy to detect malignancy was assessed in the total study group. Cumulative survival was evaluated in the total study group by using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: MR enteroclysis could not be used to discriminate between uncomplicated CD and RCD I. The presence of less than 10 folds per 5 cm jejunum, mesenteric fat infiltration, and bowel wall thickening were associated with RCD II. A positive MR score was defined as the presence of two or more of these features. In the validation group, the MR score was positive in 13 of 15 patients with RCD II (sensitivity, 0.87) and negative in 24 of 25 patients without RCD II (specificity, 0.96). The 5-year survival rate was 95% in patients with a negative MR score and 56% in patients with a positive MR score (P < .0001). MR enteroclysis helped to identify the presence of seven of eight malignancies and to diagnose absence of malignancy in 58 of 60 studies. CONCLUSION: MR enteroclysis can be used to investigate the presence of RCD II or malignancy in symptomatic patients with CD.