Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 117(3): 368, 2022 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34928865
2.
J Clin Med ; 10(23)2021 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34884410

ABSTRACT

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in digestive endoscopy, especially in capsule endoscopy (CE). However, some physicians still have some difficulties and fear the advent of this technology. We aimed to evaluate the perceptions and current sentiments toward the use of AI in CE. An online survey questionnaire was sent to an audience of gastroenterologists. In addition, several European national leaders of the International CApsule endoscopy REsearch (I CARE) Group were asked to disseminate an online survey among their national communities of CE readers (CER). The survey included 32 questions regarding general information, perceptions of AI, and its use in daily life, medicine, endoscopy, and CE. Among 380 European gastroenterologists who answered this survey, 333 (88%) were CERs. The mean average time length of experience in CE reading was 9.9 years (0.5-22). A majority of CERs agreed that AI would positively impact CE, shorten CE reading time, and help standardize reporting in CE and characterize lesions seen in CE. Nevertheless, in the foreseeable future, a majority of CERs disagreed with the complete replacement all CE reading by AI. Most CERs believed in the high potential of AI for becoming a valuable tool for automated diagnosis and for shortening the reading time. Currently, the perception is that AI will not replace CE reading.

4.
Eur J Intern Med ; 73: 92-93, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31902563

Subject(s)
Eyeglasses , Humans
5.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 20(2): 5, 2018 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29516183

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastrointestinal bleeding originating from the small bowel (SB) poses a challenge to the treating gastroenterologist. Once diagnosed, management is not a walk in the park either. This review intends to summarize the current state-of-the-art evidence in a complete way with special attention for vascular and ulcerative lesions, to provide the reader with a clinical guide and flow chart towards SB bleeding. RECENT FINDINGS: Absence of SB bleeding lesions on CE does not directly yield better prognosis; although having a lower rebleeding rate the first 2 years, rebleeding in the long term is high. Push enteroscopy can play an early role in patients with SB bleeding if suspicion of angioectasia is high, since these lesions tend to be located in the proximal SB. Endoscopic management of angioectasia is, however, difficult and shows poor results. Capsule endoscopy (CE) or device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) remain the diagnostic mainstay in SB bleeding, choosing one over the other based upon patient characteristics and expected lesions.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Intestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Intestinal Diseases/therapy , Age Factors , Capsule Endoscopy , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/complications , Intestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Intestine, Small/blood supply , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radionuclide Imaging , Risk Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
9.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 30(8): 1300-6, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26047631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a potential complication of radio-contrast investigations. Many organisations have published guidance documents on the prevention of CI-AKI. Our aim is to explore the scope, content, consistency, practicality in clinical practice and reasons for eventual underlying discrepancies of these documents. METHODS: We searched the literature for guidance documents developed to guide prevention of CI-AKI up to 09/2014. Four reviewers appraised guideline quality using the 23-item AGREE-II instrument, which rates reporting of the guidance development process across six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity of presentation, applicability and editorial independence. Total scores were calculated as standardised averages by domain. RESULTS: Twenty-four guidance documents were evaluated. The guidance documents were produced by radiologists (N = 7), intensivists (N = 2), nephrologists (N = 6) or multidisciplinary teams (N = 9). One document did not mention the background of the authors. Only guidance documents (N = 15) that were not mere adaptations of existing guidelines were evaluated more in depth, using the AGREE tool. Overall, quality was mixed: only one clinical practice guidance document obtained an average score of >50% for all domains. The evidence was rated in a systematic way in only 11, and only 7 graded the strength of the recommendations. The Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcomes guideline was the only one recommended without adaptions by all assessors. The guidance documents agreed in recommending pre-hydration as the main preventive measure, but there was difference in recommended total volumes, composition, rate and duration of the infused solutions. There was no consensus on the use of NaHCO3, with eight recommending it, six considering it and one not. Five guidance documents mentioned oral pre-hydration as a possibility, and none recommended N-acetylcysteine as solitary preventive measure. More recent guidance documents recommend avoiding hypertonic contrast media, but did not recommend preference of iso-osmolar over low-osmolar contrast media. Most guidance documents recognised pre-existing chronic kidney disease, diabetes, age and cardiovascular comorbidity as risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be a relative consensus on the need for adequate pre-hydration to avoid CI-AKI, but recommendations to define at-risk populations for whom these measures should be applied and how they should be implemented differ substantially. Based on accumulating evidence, more recent guidelines do not recommend iso-osmolar over low-osmolar contrast media, whereas all recommend avoiding hypertonic agents.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/adverse effects , Guideline Adherence , Kidney Diseases/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Consensus , Humans , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Quality Control , United States
10.
World J Gastrointest Endosc ; 7(1): 13-36, 2015 Jan 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25610531

ABSTRACT

The development of capsule endoscopy (CE) in 2001 has given gastroenterologists the opportunity to investigate the small bowel in a non-invasive way. CE is most commonly performed for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, but other indications include diagnosis or follow-up of Crohn's disease, suspicion of a small bowel tumor, diagnosis and surveillance of hereditary polyposis syndromes, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small bowel lesions and celiac disease. Almost fifteen years have passed since the release of the small bowel capsule. The purpose of this review is to offer the reader a brief but complete overview on small bowel CE anno 2014, including the technical and procedural aspects, the possible complications and the most important indications. We will end with some future perspectives of CE.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...