Residential Treatment Exclusively for Tobacco Use Disorder: A Narrative Review.

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use disorder is a major public health issue, and novel smoking cessation approaches are urgently needed. Residential treatment programs have been suggested as a potentially effective treatment for tobacco use disorder. However, there is limited literature on residential treatment programs for patients who are exclusively dependent on nicotine. AIM: The aim of this study is to review the literature on residential treatment programs for patients admitted exclusively for tobacco use disorder. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed with the aim of identifying relevant articles on residential treatment exclusively for tobacco use disorder from inception until February 2023. References in retrieved articles were screened for additional relevant articles. RESULTS: Fourteen studies on residential treatment programs for tobacco use disorder were identified. The duration of the residential cessation programs ranged from 3 days to 3 weeks. Individualized or group cognitive behavioral therapy and tailored pharmacotherapy were the key components of the programs. Eligibility criteria for the programs included moderate to severe tobacco use disorder as measured by Fagerström or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), consistent relapses, smoking-related comorbidities (eg, cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases), and daily use of (smokeless) tobacco. The 6- and 12-month 7-day point prevalence rate ranged from 58% to 26%, whereas the 6- and 12-month continuous abstinence rate ranged from 52% to 29%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the literature we reviewed, residential smoking cessation programs targeted exclusively at individuals with tobacco use disorder have shown effectiveness, particularly for those who are highly dependent on tobacco and have a history of relapse. However, more research is needed to further explore the effectiveness of these programs and to determine the optimal program components and duration.

Petrus Camper's work on the anatomy and pathology of the arm and hand in the 18th century.

Petrus Camper (1722-1789) was a professor of anatomy and surgery at the Universities of Franeker, Amsterdam and Groningen. During the mid-18th century, he performed dissections to study the anatomy and pathology of the arm. Based on his findings, he published one of the most detailed anatomical atlases of the arm and hand in history, entitled Demonstrationum anatomico-pathologicarum liber primus brachii humani fabricam et morbos. In his atlas, he describes the "chiasma" indicating the intersections of the superficial and deep flexor tendons, which are essential for the gripping function of the hand. Camper's anatomical studies and elaborate illustrations contributed to a better understanding of the anatomy and pathology of the arm.

[A master's exam in surgical training]. / De meesterproef in de chirurgijnsopleiding. Een historisch concept als voorbeeld voor nu?

AN EXAMPLE FOR THE PRESENT DAY: The current requirement for explicit quality standards and examination of surgeons is an opportunity to contemplate surgical training from a historical perspective by looking at the regulations of the Amsterdam Surgeons' Guild (1461-1736). At that time Amsterdam surgeons usually trained for five years in a master-apprentice relationship under the guidance of a master surgeon in a surgeon's shop. An important part of the surgical training took place in the botanical gardens and anatomical theatre, where, during the weekly lessons, the praelector anatomiae would also demonstrate anatomy on the bodies of the deceased. Surgical training was complete after the trainee had passed the 'meesterproef' (master's exam), in which the manufacturing of lancets, blood-letting and performing a trepanation on a skull played a major part. However, over the course of time the final master's exam as the ultimate test of capability at the end of surgical training has disappeared. From the perspective of renewed interest in explicit quality standards and examination of surgeons, the reintroduction of a modern master's exam should perhaps be considered.

An early observation on the anatomy of the inguinal canal and the etiology of inguinal hernias by Petrus Camper in the 18th century.

The famous Dutch medical doctor Petrus Camper (1722-1789) was appointed professor of anatomy and surgery at the University of Franeker, Amsterdam, and Groningen. As Praelector Anatomiae of the Amsterdam Guild of Surgeons, he gave public anatomy lessons in the Anatomy theatre in Amsterdam. During the mid 18th century he performed dissections on corpses of children and adults to investigate the anatomy and etiology of inguinal hernias. The concept that a hernia was caused by "a rupture of the peritoneum" was common at that time. Camper concluded that this was incorrect and provided a clear description of the etiology of hernias in children and adults. For the treatment of inguinal hernias, he designed a truss based on the geometrical proportions of the pelvis. This "truss of Camper" was much used and internationally renowned. His anatomical studies and perfect, self-drawn illustrations contributed to a better understanding of the anatomy of the inguinal canal, on the national as well as international level. Camper's "Icones Herniarum" is his most widely known work on inguinal hernias and included a series of outstanding anatomical illustrations. Petrus Camper should be considered one of the pioneers in the field of inguinal hernias.

Sir Charles Alfred Ballance (1856-1936) and the introduction of facial nerve crossover anastomosis in 1895.

Sir Charles Ballance (1856-1936) was the first surgeon in history to perform a facial nerve crossover anastomosis in 1895. Although, recently, several papers on the history of facial nerve surgery have been published, little is known about this historically important operation, the theoretical reasoning behind the operation or the surgical perspective in which Ballance developed this method. An original document on the operation, dated in 1895, is not known. The earliest report of the operation is a paper by Ballance, published in 1903. Study of this 1903 paper reveals that Ballance stopped performing the operation after his first attempt in 1895 until he resumed in December 1901. What was the reason for this interruption? Why did Ballance start doing it again in 1901? Between 1895 and Ballance's 1903 paper, several other surgeons had published the results of their facial nerve crossovers. Were they inspired by Ballance's operation from 1895 to do the same or did they invent the method independently? To enhance our knowledge about the early history of facial nerve surgery, the original manuscripts by Ballance and his contemporaries have been studied. Ballance's first facial nerve crossover from 1895 is described in the surgical perspective of the end of the 19th century. The theoretical reasoning for the operation is discussed. It was discovered that Ballance's operation was first recorded in St. Thomas's Hospital Report of 1895, which was published in 1897. However, this report was probably hardly known by Ballance's contemporaries and consequently could not have stimulated them to perform the operation themselves. Jean Louis Faure (1863-1944), from France, appears to have been the first to have performed the operation until Ballance's 1903 paper was published. In 1903, after Ballance's paper had been published, many other accounts of this method were reported in the literature. At that moment facial nerve crossover seems to have been widely regarded as a potential successful technique, a technique which, a century later, is still part of our repertoire.