Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Anaesthesia ; 64(9): 1004-9, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19686486

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of stroke volume variation (SVV) as measured by the LiDCOplus system (SVVli) and by the FloTrac-Vigileo system (SVVed). We measured SVVli and SVVed in 15 postoperative cardiac surgical patients following five study interventions; a 50% increase in tidal volume, an increase of PEEP by 10 cm H2O, passive leg raising, a head-up tilt procedure and fluid loading. Between each intervention, baseline measurements were performed. 136 data pairs were obtained. SVVli ranged from 1.4% to 26.8% (mean (SD) 8.7 (4.6)%); SVVed from 2.0% to 26.0% (10.2 (4.7)%). The bias was found to be significantly different from zero at 1.5 (2.5)%, p < 0.001, (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.9). The upper and lower limits of agreement were found to be 6.4 and -3.5% respectively. The coefficient of variation for the differences between SVVli and SVVed was 26%. This results in a relative large range for the percentage limits of agreement of 52%. Analysis in repeated measures showed coefficients of variation of 21% for SVVli and 22% for SVVed. The LiDCOplus and FloTrac-Vigileo system are not interchangeable. Furthermore, the determination of SVVli and SVVed are too ambiguous, as can be concluded from the high values of the coefficient of variation for repeated measures. These findings underline Pinsky's warning of caution in the clinical use of SVV by pulse contour techniques.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Postoperative Care/methods , Stroke Volume , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Artery Bypass , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Postoperative Care/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Anaesthesia ; 64(7): 762-9, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19624632

ABSTRACT

We evaluated cardiac output (CO) using three new methods - the auto-calibrated FloTrac-Vigileo (CO(ed)), the non-calibrated Modelflow (CO(mf) ) pulse contour method and the ultra-sound HemoSonic system (CO(hs)) - with thermodilution (CO(td)) as the reference. In 13 postoperative cardiac surgical patients, 104 paired CO values were assessed before, during and after four interventions: (i) an increase of tidal volume by 50%; (ii) a 10 cm H(2)O increase in positive end-expiratory pressure; (iii) passive leg raising and (iv) head up position. With the pooled data the difference (bias (2SD)) between CO(ed) and CO(td), CO(mf) and CO(td) and CO(hs) and CO(td) was 0.33 (0.90), 0.30 (0.69) and -0.41 (1.11) l.min(-1), respectively. Thus, Modelflow had the lowest mean squared error, suggesting that it had the best performance. CO(ed) significantly overestimates changes in cardiac output while CO(mf) and CO(hs) values are not significantly different from those of CO(td). Directional changes in cardiac output by thermodilution were detected with a high score by all three methods.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Output , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Postoperative Care/methods , Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Thoracic/physiopathology , Blood Flow Velocity/physiology , Coronary Artery Bypass , Critical Care/methods , Humans , Mitral Valve/surgery , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Posture/physiology , Reproducibility of Results , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Thermodilution , Ultrasonography
3.
J Infect ; 56(6): 446-53, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18511122

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A four-fold increase in the incidence of Serratia marcescens occurred in a cardio-thoracic ICU within a 13-month period. Clinical, epidemiological and molecular characteristics were analysed to elucidate the outbreak's origin. METHODS: Epidemiological data were analysed by mapping clustered cases; isolates were genotyped by AFLP analysis. A case-control study was performed to identify risk factors for the acquisition of S. marcescens. Data were obtained from files and electronic databases of the ICU and Department of Medical Microbiology. The adherence to hygiene protocols on the ICU was reviewed by a medical audit. RESULTS: Genotyping showed 16 distinct S. marcescens strains. Twenty-one cases and 39 controls were enrolled in the case-control study. Significant differences found by univariate analysis included the duration of surgery, APACHE-II-score on ICU admission, length of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, tube feeding and the sum of the number of days per invasive device. In a multivariate logistic regression model, the length of ICU stay and tube feeding were independent risk factors. Outbreak strains were not more frequently resistant to gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, meropenem or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as compared to a reference group. Hygiene protocols, including hand washing, were insufficiently practiced by the ICU's medical staff. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of the strains points to transmission from various sources. This outbreak of S. marcescens was most probably caused by reduced hand washing and other breaks in infection prevention protocols in combination with the presence of the identified risk factors, which act by affecting the number and intensity of potential transmission events.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Serratia Infections/epidemiology , Serratia marcescens/isolation & purification , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Case-Control Studies , Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Genotype , Humans , Hygiene , Incidence , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Phylogeny , Risk Factors , Serratia Infections/microbiology , Serratia marcescens/classification , Serratia marcescens/drug effects , Serratia marcescens/genetics
4.
Anaesthesia ; 62(8): 760-8, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17635422

ABSTRACT

The bias, precision and tracking ability of five different pulse contour methods were evaluated by simultaneous comparison of cardiac output values from the conventional thermodilution technique (COtd). The five different pulse contour methods included in this study were: Wesseling's method (cZ); the Modelflow method; the LiDCO system; the PiCCO system and a recently developed Hemac method. We studied 24 cardiac surgery patients undergoing uncomplicated coronary artery bypass grafting. In each patient, the first series of COtd was used to calibrate the five pulse contour methods. In all, 199 series of measurements were accepted by all methods and included in the study. COtd ranged from 2.14 to 7.55 l.min(-1), with a mean of 4.81 l.min(-1). Bland-Altman analysis showed the following bias and limits of agreement: cZ, 0.23 and - 0.80 to 1.26 l.min(-1); Modelflow, 0.00 and - 0.74 to 0.74 l.min(-1); LiDCO, - 0.17 and - 1.55 to 1.20 l.min(-1); PiCCO, 0.14 and - 1.60 to 1.89 l.min(-1); and Hemac, 0.06 and - 0.81 to 0.93 l.min(-1). Changes in cardiac output larger than 0.5 l.min(-1) (10%) were correctly followed by the Modelflow and the Hemac method in 96% of cases. In this group of subjects, without congestive heart failure, with normal heart rhythm and reasonable peripheral circulation, the best results in absolute values as well as in tracking changes in cardiac output were measured using the Modelflow and Hemac pulse contour methods, based on non-linear three-element Windkessel models.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Output , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Stroke Volume , Thermodilution
5.
Anaesthesia ; 61(8): 743-6, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16867085

ABSTRACT

This study was performed to determine the interchangeability of femoral artery pressure and radial artery pressure measurements as the input for the PiCCO system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany). We studied 15 intensive care patients following cardiac surgery. Five-second averages of the cardiac output derived from the femoral artery pressure (COfem) were compared to 5-s averages derived from the radial artery pressure (COrad). One patient was excluded due to problems in the pattern recognition of the arterial pressure signal. In the remaining 14 patients, 14 734 comparative cardiac output values were analysed. The mean sample time was 88 min, range [30-119 min]. Mean (SD) COfem was 6.24 (1.1) l.min(-1) and mean COrad 6.23 (1.1) l.min(-1). Bland-Altman analysis showed an excellent agreement with a bias of - 0.01 l.min(-1), and limits of agreement from 0.60 to - 0.62 l.min(-1). If changes in CO were > 0.5 l.min(-1), the direction of changes in COfem and COrad were equal in 97% of instances. We conclude that femoral artery pressure and radial artery pressure are interchangeable as inputs for the PiCCO device.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Output/physiology , Femoral Artery/physiology , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Radial Artery/physiology , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Critical Care/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Postoperative Care/methods , Reproducibility of Results
6.
Br J Anaesth ; 95(3): 326-31, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16006488

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiac output by modelflow pulse contour method can be monitored quantitatively and continuously only after an initial calibration, to adapt the model to an individual patient. The modelflow method computes beat-to-beat cardiac output (COmf) from the radial artery pressure, by simulating a three-element model of aortic impedance with post-mortem data from human aortas. METHODS: In our improved version of modelflow (COmfc) we adapted this model to a real time measure of the aortic cross-sectional area (CSA) of the descending aorta just above the diaphragm, measured by a new transoesophageal echo device (HemoSonic 100). COmf and COmfc were compared with thermodilution cardiac output (COtd) in 24 patients in the intensive care unit. Each thermodilution value was the mean of four measurements equally spread over the ventilatory cycle. RESULTS: Least squares regression of COtd vs COmf gave y=1.09x[95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.22], R2=0.15, and of COtd vs COmfc resulted in y=1.02x(95% CI 0.96-1.08), R2=0.69. The limits of agreement of the un-calibrated COmf were -3.53 to 2.79, bias=0.37 litre min(-1) and of the diameter-calibrated method COmfc, -1.48 to 1.32, bias=-0.08 litre min(-1). The coefficient of variation for the difference between methods decreased from 28 (un-calibrated) to 12% after diameter-calibration. CONCLUSIONS: After diameter-calibration, the improved modelflow pulse contour method reliably estimates cardiac output without the need of a calibration with thermodilution, leading to a less invasive cardiac output monitoring method.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Thoracic/anatomy & histology , Cardiac Output , Models, Cardiovascular , Adult , Aged , Anthropometry , Blood Pressure , Calibration , Computer Simulation , Critical Care/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Postoperative Care/methods , Radial Artery/physiology , Thermodilution/methods
7.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 160(1): 67-73, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11862375

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Co-morbidity of mood and anxiety disorders is often ignored in pharmacotreatment outcome studies and this complicates the interpretation of treatment response. The clinical trials are usually based on single categories from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). OBJECTIVES: The present study is a first attempt to differentiate the responses to antidepressants using a design that differs from that used in previous clinical trials. To avoid bias due to co-morbidity, we included patients with any DSM-III-R diagnosis of mood or anxiety disorder for which antidepressant treatment was indicated. We also explored the role of the diagnosis at the first episode in the efficacy of the different antidepressants. METHODS: A total of 92 outpatients with a mood and/or anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to treatment with imipramine or fluvoxamine in a 6-week study. The diagnosis at the first episode--or primary diagnosis--was available for 78 patients, 40 with a primary depression and 38 with a primary anxiety disorder. RESULTS: Analyses using the MIXED procedure for repeated measures showed no general differences between treatment with imipramine and treatment with fluvoxamine. When the primary diagnoses were taken into consideration, differentiation occurred. Patients with primary depression showed better responses to imipramine than to fluvoxamine. The assumption that patients with primary anxiety disorder would respond better to fluvoxamine than imipramine was observed for only the Clinical Global Impression. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the nature of the first illness episode may be more valuable than the DSM categories of mood or anxiety disorders, which may lend support to the concept of primary versus secondary depression for purposes of differentiating treatment responses. Given the exploratory nature of the study, however, replication of our finding is needed.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Mood Disorders/drug therapy , Mood Disorders/psychology , Adult , Aged , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Fluvoxamine/therapeutic use , Humans , Imipramine/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
8.
Crit Care Med ; 29(10): 1868-73, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11588442

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A new method to estimate mean cardiac output by thermodilution with a single duration-controlled injection was evaluated in patients. DESIGN: Prospective criterion standard study. SETTING: University hospital cardiac surgical intensive care unit and cardiac operation room. PATIENTS: Of 33 patients, 24 underwent coronary bypass graft surgery, four had a valve replacement, and five were treated in the intensive care unit. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions consisted of thermodilution cardiac output measurements. One single duration-controlled injection of cold fluid was used to calculate cardiac output. This controlled injection was performed with a duration equal to one whole ventilation cycle of the ventilator. An algorithm adapted to this duration-controlled injection calculated cardiac output. Moreover, this algorithm has properties to reduce errors caused by artificial ventilation and thermal noise. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In 33 patients, the averaged values of four measurements equally spread over the ventilatory cycle (phase-controlled) were compared with the values of two single duration-controlled measurements. The measurements were performed during periods of stable respiration and circulation. No significant difference was observed between the mean of four phase-controlled measurements and the mean of the two duration-controlled measurements. The cardiac output values in the intensive care patients were significantly higher compared with the two other patient groups (p <.05). The difference between the two methods could not be subdivided for the three patient groups (p >.05). The coefficient of variation of the single duration-controlled thermodilution measurements was significantly lower than the single phase-controlled measurements, 3% vs. 6% (p <.01). CONCLUSIONS: One single duration-controlled injection thermodilution measurement is as accurate and repeatable as the mean of four phase-controlled measurements and is clinically feasible.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Output , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnosis , Thermodilution/methods , Adult , Aged , Coronary Care Units , Coronary Disease/surgery , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care , Probability , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
10.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 145(49): 2366-71, 2001 Dec 08.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11770263

ABSTRACT

Anthrax is a zoonosis which is particularly prevalent in cattle, goats and sheep and is caused by Bacillus anthracis, a Gram-positive spore forming aerobic microorganism. The endospores can survive outside of the body for many decades. The natural form of anthrax has a cutaneous, pulmonary and intestinal form. The pulmonary form can be rapidly fatal but is difficult to recognise due to an initially non-specific, flu-like clinical picture. As a result of spores being inhaled, a mediastinal lymphadenitis arises from which a systemic disease develops with a violent toxaemia, damage to the vascular endothelium, oedema, internal haemorrhages and circulatory collapse. Anthrax is diagnosed by demonstrating the presence of the bacteria in the cutaneous abnormality, in blood or another sterile body component such as cerebrospinal fluid, by means of a direct preparation, immunofluorescence or surface antigens, molecular diagnostics with PCR, or by means of culturing. B. anthracis is sensitive to quinolones, clindamycin and tetracyclines, and often to penicillin. Although naturally acquired cutaneous anthrax can be effectively treated with a short antibiotic cure, it is nevertheless advised in the USA to complete the full 60-day cure and to regard the cutaneous manifestation as a telltale sign of possible respiratory exposure. Anthrax is not transmitted from one person to another.


Subject(s)
Anthrax , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacillus anthracis/isolation & purification , Bioterrorism , Adult , Anthrax/diagnosis , Anthrax/drug therapy , Anthrax/epidemiology , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Gastroenteritis/diagnosis , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/diagnosis
12.
J Crit Care ; 12(2): 56-65, 1997 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9165413

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the dynamic changes in right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) output during positive airway pressure inspiratory hold maneuvers so as to characterize the interaction of processes in creating steady-state cardiac output during positive pressure ventilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the disparity of RV and LV outputs at 5 seconds (early) and 20 seconds (late) into a 24-second inspiratory hold maneuver in 14 subjects in the intensive care unit immediately following coronary artery bypass surgery. RV output was measured by the thermodilution technique, whereas LV output was measured by the arterial pulse contour method. RV and LV volumes were also measured by thermal and radionuclide ejection fraction techniques, respectively. RESULTS: As P(aw) was progressively increased from 0 to 20 cm H2O in sequential inspiratory hold maneuvers, both RV and LV outputs changed differently both at 5 seconds and 20 seconds into the inspiratory hold maneuvers. When expressed as change in cardiac output (L/min) for every cm H2O P(aw) increase relative to end-expiratory values, RV output increased at 5 seconds (0.05 +/- 0.15 L/min) then decreased at 20 seconds (-0.08 +/- 0.21, P < .05). LV output decreased slightly at 5 seconds (-0.14 +/- 0.22) and did not change from this minimal depressed level at 20 seconds (P < .05). Changes in RV and LV output were paralleled by changes in RV and LV end-diastolic volumes, respectively. CONCLUSION: Positive pressure inspiration induces time-dependent changes in central hemodynamics, which are dissimilar between RV and LV function. Initially, inspiration increases RV output but decreases LV output, such that intrathoracic blood volume increases. However, sustained inspiratory pressures induce proportionally similar decreases in both RV and LV outputs. Thus, the hemodynamic effects of positive pressure ventilation will depend on the degree of lung inflation, the inspiratory time, and when measurements are made within the ventilatory cycle. These data also suggest that positive pressure ventilation with up to 20 cm H2) P(aw) does not significantly impair ventricular performance in humans.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Output , Coronary Artery Bypass , Heart Ventricles , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Aged , Blood Pressure , Cardiac Volume , Clinical Protocols , Heart Rate , Humans , Middle Aged
13.
J Cardiothorac Anesth ; 3(4): 441-3, 1989 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2577703

ABSTRACT

Dopexamine is a new dopamine analogue, with combined agonist properties on dopamine receptors and the beta 2-adrenoceptor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term hemodynamic effects of dopexamine at different dosage rates in postoperative coronary artery bypass (CABG) patients, especially with respect to the right ventricle, using a right ventricular ejection fraction pulmonary artery catheter. With a dose of 2 micrograms/kg/min of dopexamine, significant increases in heart rate (25%), cardiac index (33%), and right ventricular ejection fraction (20%) were observed. Pulmonary vascular resistance decreased with a dose over 1 microgram/kg/min (15%). Mean arterial blood pressure and pulmonary artery pressures were not affected. At 4 micrograms/kg/min, cardiac index was further increased. In conclusion, dopexamine could be beneficial to patients with a compromised right ventricle by lowering afterload and improving ventricular performance after CABG.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic Agonists/therapeutic use , Cardiac Output/drug effects , Coronary Artery Bypass , Dopamine/analogs & derivatives , Pulmonary Artery/physiology , Vascular Resistance/drug effects , Ventricular Function, Right/drug effects , Adrenergic Agonists/administration & dosage , Aged , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Dopamine/administration & dosage , Dopamine/therapeutic use , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stroke Volume/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...