Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21995816

ABSTRACT

Thirteen laboratories participated in an inter-laboratory study to evaluate the method performance characteristics of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method (LC-MS/MS) for marine lipophilic shellfish toxins. Method performance characteristics were evaluated for mussel (Mytilus edulis), oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and cockle (Cerastoderma edule) matrices. The specific toxin analogues tested included okadaic acid (OA), dinophysistoxins-1 and -2 (DTX1, -2), azaspiracids-1, -2 and -3 (AZA1, -2, -3), pectenotoxin-2 (PTX2), yessotoxin (YTX), and 45-OH-yessotoxin (45-OH-YTX). The instrumental technique was developed as an alternative to the still widely applied biological methods (mouse or rat bioassay). Validation was conducted according to the AOAC-harmonised protocol for the design, conduct and interpretation of method-performance studies. Eight different test materials were sent as blind duplicates to the participating laboratories. Twelve laboratories returned results that were accepted to be included in the statistical evaluation. The method precision was expressed as HORRATs. For the individual toxins (except for 45-OH-YTX) HORRATs were found to be ≤1.8 (median HORRAT=0.8) in all tested materials. The recoveries of OA-, AZA- and YTX-group toxins were within the range of 80-108% and PTX2 was within the range of 62-93%. Based on the acceptable values for precision and recovery, it was concluded that the method is suitable for official control purposes to quantitatively determine OA/DTXs, AZAs, YTXs and PTX2 in shellfish.


Subject(s)
Bivalvia/chemistry , Cardiidae/chemistry , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Marine Toxins/analysis , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Ostreidae/chemistry , Animals , Biological Assay , Food Contamination , Laboratories , Mice , Quality Control , Rats , Shellfish/analysis , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21360378

ABSTRACT

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids are toxins present in many plants belonging to the families of Asteraceae, Boraginaceae and Fabaceae. Particularly notorious are pyrrolizidine alkaloids present in ragwort species (Senecio), which are held responsible for hepatic disease in horses and cows and may lead to the death of the affected animals. In addition, these compounds may be transferred to edible products of animal origin and as such be a threat for the health of consumers. To investigate the possible transfer of pyrrolizidine alkaloids from contaminated feed to milk, cows were put on a ration for 3 weeks with increasing amounts (50-200 g day(-1)) of dried ragwort. Milk was collected and sampled twice a day; faeces and urine twice a week. For milk, a dose-related appearance of pyrrolizidine alkaloids was found. Jacoline was the major component in milk despite being a minor component in the ragwort material. Practically no N-oxides were observed in milk, notwithstanding the fact that they constituted over 80% of the pyrrolizidine alkaloids in ragwort. The overall carry-over of the pyrrolizidine alkaloids was estimated to be only around 0.1%, but for jacoline 4%. Notwithstanding the low overall carry-over, this may be relevant for consumer health considering the genotoxic and carcinogenic properties demonstrated for some of these compounds. Analysis of the faeces and urine samples indicated that substantial metabolism of pyrrolizidine alkaloids is taking place. The toxicity and potential transfer of metabolites to milk is unknown and remains to be investigated.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Cattle/metabolism , Milk/chemistry , Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids/analysis , Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Chromatography, Liquid , Feces/chemistry , Female , Food Contamination/analysis , Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids/urine , Senecio/chemistry , Tandem Mass Spectrometry
3.
Food Addit Contam ; 21(4): 331-40, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15204557

ABSTRACT

Paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins are produced by dinoflagellates. Shellfish filtering these unicellular algae will accumulate the toxins and pose a health risk when consumed by man. In the European Union, paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins in bivalve molluscs are regulated at a maximum content of 80 microg/100 g (91/492/EEC). The current reference method in the European Union is the mouse bioassay, but alternative methods including the liquid chromatography methodology are preferred for ethical reasons. Analyses of suspected shellfish batches revealed, however, unacceptable differences in results reported by a small group of Dutch laboratories all using liquid chromatography methods with precolumn derivatization, followed by fluorescence detection. Therefore, a series of proficiency studies were undertaken among these laboratories. In the first three studies, participants were more or less allowed their own choice of method execution details. This approach yielded unsatisfactory results. A fourth study was then initiated in which a standardized method was mandatory. Two types of test material were used in the fourth study: lyophilized Cardium tuberculatum material containing saxitoxin (STX) and decarbamoyl-saxitoxin (dc-STX), and lyophilized mussel material containing dc-STX. The latter material was investigated in an interlaboratory study involving 15 participants and was considered as the reference material. Among the four laboratories, coefficients of variation (ANOVA) for C. tuberculatum material were 10% (n = 11) and 9% (n = 12) for STX and dc-STX, respectively, and for the reference material was 8% (n = 12) for dc-STX. The joint efforts showed that variability in analysis results between laboratories that all apply more or less the same method can be drastically improved if the methodology is rigorously standardized.


Subject(s)
Marine Toxins/analysis , Neurotoxins/analysis , Saxitoxin/analogs & derivatives , Shellfish/analysis , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Chromatography, Liquid/standards , Food Analysis/methods , Food Analysis/standards , Humans , Laboratories/standards , Marine Toxins/isolation & purification , Netherlands , Neurotoxins/isolation & purification , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results , Saxitoxin/analysis , Saxitoxin/isolation & purification
4.
Food Addit Contam ; 18(9): 810-24, 2001 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11552748

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the second part of a project undertaken to develop certified mussel reference materials for paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins. In the first part two interlaboratory studies were undertaken to investigate the performance of the analytical methodology for several PSP toxins, in particular saxitoxin and decarbamoyl-saxitoxin in lyophilized mussels, and to set criteria for the acceptance of results to be applied during the certification exercise. Fifteen laboratories participated in this certification study and were asked to measure saxitoxin and decarbamoyl-saxitoxin in rehydrated lyophilized mussel material and in a saxitoxin-enriched mussel material. The participants were allowed to use a method of their choice but with an extraction procedure to be strictly followed. The study included extra experiments to verify the detection limits for both saxitoxin and decarbamoyl-saxitoxin. Most participants (13 of 15) were able to meet all the criteria set for the certification study. Results for saxitoxin.2HCl yielded a certified mass fraction of <0.07 mg/kg in the rehydrated lyophilized mussels. Results obtained for decarbamoyl-saxitoxin.2HCl yielded a certified mass fraction of 1.59+/-0.20 mg/kg. The results for saxitoxin.2HCl in enriched blank mussel yielded a certified mass fraction of 0.48 +/- 0.06 mg/kg. These certified reference materials for paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins in lyophilized mussel material are the first available for laboratories to test their method for accuracy and performance.


Subject(s)
Bivalvia/chemistry , Certification/methods , Food Contamination , Saxitoxin/analysis , Animals , Freeze Drying/methods , Humans , Reference Standards , Saxitoxin/analogs & derivatives , Saxitoxin/chemistry , Spain
5.
Food Addit Contam ; 17(6): 419-33, 2000 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10932785

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the first part of a project undertaken to develop mussel reference materials for Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) toxins. Two interlaboratory studies were undertaken to investigate the performance of the analytical methodology for several PSP toxins, in particular saxitoxin (STX) and decarbamoyl-saxitoxin (dc-STX) in lyophilized mussels, and to set criteria for the acceptance of results to be applied during the second part of the project: the certification exercise. In the first study, 18 laboratories were asked to measure STX and dc-STX in rehydrated lyophilized mussel material and to identify as many other PSP toxins as possible with a method of their choice. In the second interlaboratory study, 15 laboratories were additionally asked to determine quantitatively STX and dc-STX in rehydrated lyophilized mussel and in a saxitoxin-enriched mussel material. The first study revealed that three out of four post-column derivatization methods and one pre-column derivatization method sufficed in principle to determine STX and dc-STX. Most participants (13 of 18) obtained acceptable calibration curves and recoveries. Saxitoxin was hardly detected in the rehydrated lyophilized mussels and results obtained for dc-STX yielded a CV of 58% at a mass fraction of 1.86 mg/kg. Most participants (14 out of 18) identified gonyautoxin-5 (GTX-5) in a hydrolysed extract provided. The first study led to provisional criteria for linearity, recovery and separation. The second study revealed that 6 out of 15 laboratories were able to meet these criteria. Results obtained for dc-STX yielded a CV of 19% at a mass fraction of 3.49 mg/kg. Results obtained for STX in the saxitoxin-enriched material yielded a CV of 19% at a mass fraction of 0.34 mg/kg. Saxitoxin could not be detected in the PSP-positive material. Hydrolysis was useful to confirm the identity of GTX-5 and provided indicative information about C1 and C2 toxins in the PSP-positive material. The methods used in the second interlaboratory study showed sufficiently consistent analysis results to undertake a certification exercise to assign certified values for STX and dc-STX in lyophilized mussel.


Subject(s)
Bivalvia/chemistry , Marine Toxins/analysis , Neurotoxins/analysis , Shellfish/analysis , Animals , Freeze Drying , Laboratories/standards , Marine Toxins/standards , Molecular Structure , Neurotoxins/chemistry , Neurotoxins/standards , Reference Standards , Saxitoxin/analogs & derivatives , Saxitoxin/analysis , Shellfish/standards
6.
Food Addit Contam ; 11(1): 39-56, 1994.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8181632

ABSTRACT

Within the framework of the European Commission's Measurements and Testing Programme (BCR) a project has been undertaken to develop shellfish reference materials for Paralytic Shellfish Poisons (PSP). In a preliminary phase of the project, an intercomparison study of methods was undertaken. In this exercise 18 laboratories were asked to analyse solutions of saxitoxin and PSP-containing shellfish extracts with a method of their choice. The study revealed that: all the methods considered (four HPLC methods, one ELISA method) were in principle adequate for the quantification of saxitoxin in solution in the absence of interfering substances (Coefficient of variation (CV) 33% at a concentration of 0.5 microgram/ml); three of the HPLC methods used were able to quantify saxitoxin in PSP-positive mussel extract, the fourth method gave significant overestimation; the CV of all HPLC results was 53% at a mean saxitoxin mass fraction of 2.06 mg/kg mussel meat, the recoveries varied from 59-173%; and the ELISA method grossly overestimated the saxitoxin content in mussel extract, probably due to cross reactions of the antibodies with other PSP. The feasibility of preparing a homogeneous batch of ampouled mussel extracts (CV 3.5% at a saxitoxin concentration of approximately 1.5 mg/kg shellfish), sufficiently stable for at least 4 months storage both at 4 degrees C and approximately 20 degrees C, was demonstrated. The performance of the different methods for the analysis of PSP other than saxitoxin has not yet been evaluated, due to the current lack of PSP standards. Some of the problems observed in the intercomparison study were partly due to the nature of the chromatographic columns used, the composition of the HPLC mobile phase (pH, ion strength), non-optimal conditions for derivatization and matrix interference. Following the outcome of this study, a three year multistage project involving 15-20 European laboratories has been initiated, aimed at improving the accuracy and comparability of PSP measurements as well as preparing reference materials for PSP.


Subject(s)
Bivalvia/chemistry , Saxitoxin/analysis , Animals , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Europe , Laboratories , Molecular Structure , Reference Values , Saxitoxin/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL