Interventricular Septal Hematoma Complicating Left Branch Bundle Lead Implantation: Treatment by Covered Stent.

We present a female patient with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who underwent left bundle branch cardiac resynchronization therapy. Left bundle branch lead implantation was complicated with septal branch perforation causing an iatrogenic coronary fistula complicated by septal hematoma formation and development of shock. Occlusion by covered stents was successfully achieved.

Fragmented QRS as a predictor of arrhythmic events in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine whether fragmented QRS (fQRS) in the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) at implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant can predict arrhythmic events using appropriate therapy delivered by the ICD as a surrogate. BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is a genetic disorder associated with life-threatening arrhythmias frequently requiring an ICD. Seeking a noninvasive method of risk stratification remains a challenge. METHODS: This paper is a retrospective, multicenter study of patients with HOCM and ICD. Surface 12-lead ECGs were analyzed. Appropriate therapy was validated by a blinded Core Lab. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: We included 102 patients from 13 centers. Mean age at implant was 41.16 ± 18.25 years, 52% were male. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 61.56 ± 9.46% and two thirds had heart failure according to the New York Heart Association class I. Secondary prophylaxis ICD implantation was the indication for implant in 40.2% of cases. About half received a single-chamber ICD. fQRS was present at the time of diagnosis in 21 and in 54% at ICD implant. At a mean follow-up of 47.8 ± 39.3 months, 41 patients (40.2%) presented with appropriate therapy. In a multivariate logistic regression, predictors of appropriate therapy included fQRS at implant (odds ratio [OR], 16.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-74.0; p = 0.0003), history of combined ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation/sudden death (OR, 14.3; 95% CI, 3.2-69.3; p = 0.001) and history of syncope (OR, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.5-20.4; p = 0.009). Ten deaths (9.8%) occurred during the follow-up. fQRS in the lateral location increased the risk of appropriate therapy (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: fQRS predicts arrhythmic events in patients with HOCM and should be considered in a model of risk stratification.

Permanent pacing in patients with Chagas' disease.

BACKGROUND: Chagas' disease is an endemic disease in most Latin American countries. The cardiomyopathy associated with this condition often requires permanent pacing due to bradycardia. The aim of this study was to compare the indications for pacemaker implantation, intraoperative measurements, and long-term follow-up of patients with Chagas' cardiomyopathy (ChCM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) referred for pacemaker implantation. METHODS: Retrospective study including consecutive patients with ChCM (Group 1) and ICM (Group 2), who underwent pacemaker implantation in a single center. RESULTS: We analyzed 360 patients. Patients in Group 1 were younger (66.29 ± 7.01 vs 75.3 ± 7.11 years; P = 0.0001) and more often male (72% vs 60%; P = 0.05). Sinus node dysfunction (SND) was more prevalent in Group 1 (70% vs 52%; P = 0.03). Atrioventricular block was less prevalent in Group 1 (30% vs 48%; P = 0.04). No significant differences were found with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction (54.2 ± 9.1 vs 53.4 ± 8.2%; P = NS) and baseline QRS duration (119 ± 34 vs 108 ± 29 ms; P = NS). Right bundle branch block was more frequent in Group 1 (44% vs 12%; P = 0.0001), and left bundle branch block in Group 2 (6% vs 22%; P = 0.0001). Implantation time was longer in Group 1 (39 ± 19 vs 29 ± 13 minutes; P = 0.001) and was with higher atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds (1.4 ± 0.8 vs 1.0 ± 0.5 V; P = 0.001 and 1.2 ± 0.8 vs 0.6 ± 0.8 V; P = 0.001, respectively). During a follow-up of 42.8 ± 13.6 months, Group 1 had a higher incidence of new atrial fibrillation (34% vs 25.5%; P = 0.001), and there was a nonsignificant trend toward more displacements of the ventricular lead (6% vs 3.5%; P = 0.3). There were no deaths during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ChCM patients receiving pacemakers are younger and more frequently have SND compared to those with ICM. Pacemaker implant is longer in patients with ChCM disease and is with higher pacing thresholds. The incidence of new atrial fibrillation during the follow-up is significantly higher in patients with ChCM.