Heterogeneity of CFTR modulator-induced sweat chloride concentrations in people with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Sweat chloride (SC) concentrations in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) reflect relative CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein function, the primary CF defect. Populations with greater SC concentrations tend to have lesser CFTR function and more severe disease courses. CFTR modulator treatment can improve CFTR function within specific CF genotypes and is commonly associated with reduced SC concentration. However, SC concentrations do not necessarily fall to concentrations seen in the unaffected population, suggesting potential for better CFTR treatment outcomes. We characterized post-modulator SC concentration variability among CHEC-SC study participants by genotype and modulator. METHODS: PwCF receiving commercially approved modulators for ≥90 days were enrolled for a single SC measurement. Clinical data were obtained from chart review and the CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR). Variability of post-modulator SC concentrations was assessed by cumulative SC concentration frequencies. RESULTS: Post-modulator SC concentrations (n = 3787) were collected from 3131 PwCF; most (n = 1769, 47 %) were collected after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) treatment. Modulator use was associated with lower SC distributions, with post-ETI concentrations the lowest on average. Most post-ETI SC concentrations were <60 mmol/L (79 %); 26 % were <30 mmol/L. Post-ETI distributions varied by genotype. All genotypes containing at least one F508del allele had individuals with post-ETI SC ≥60 mmol/L, with the largest proportion being F508del/minimal function (31 %). CONCLUSIONS: Post-modulator SC concentration heterogeneity was observed among all genotypes and modulators, including ETI. The presence of PwCF with post-modulator SC concentrations within the CF diagnostic range suggests room for additional treatment-associated CFTR restoration in this population.

Longitudinal bacterial prevalence in cystic fibrosis airways: Fact and artifact.

BACKGROUND: Opportunistic bacterial infection is a hallmark of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease and early mortality. Poorly characterized prevalence changes have accompanied two decades of health improvements, with CFTR modulators likely to further affect infection epidemiology. METHODS: Bacterial prevalence change trends across birth cohorts were assessed with linear regression using 2001-2019 US CF Foundation Patient Registry data. Informative missingness was assessed, as was age-to-age infection status. RESULTS: Bacterial prevalence constantly changed from 2001 to 2019, with changes differing across birth cohorts. Informative censoring affected prevalence change for some organisms. Age-to-age infection status changes were greater than net changes in bacterial prevalence and varied by age. CONCLUSIONS: CF infection epidemiology changed over two decades and will continue to do so. Understanding how modulators affect infection epidemiology will require creative designs for longitudinal prevalence change studies emphasizing prevalence changes independent of effects on lung biology.

Willingness of people with cystic fibrosis receiving elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) to participate in randomized modulator and inhaled antimicrobial clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of enrolling people with CF (pwCF) taking the CFTR modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) in clinical trials of a new modulator. METHODS: PwCF receiving ETI at CHEC-SC study (NCT03350828) enrollment were surveyed for interest in 2-week to 6-month placebo- (PC) and active-comparator (AC) modulator studies. Those taking inhaled antimicrobials (inhABX) were surveyed for interest in PC inhABX studies. RESULTS: Of 1791 respondents, 75% [95% CI 73, 77] would enroll in a 2-week PC modulator study versus 51% [49, 54] for a 6-month study; 82% [81, 84] and 63% [61, 65] would enroll in 2-week and 6 month AC studies; 77% [74, 80] of 551 taking inhABX would enroll in a 2-week PC inhABX study versus 59% [55, 63] for a 6-month study. Previous clinical trial experience increased willingness. CONCLUSIONS: Study designs will affect feasibility of future clinical trials of new modulators and inhABX in people receiving ETI.

Antipseudomonal treatment decisions during CF exacerbation management.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) treatment guidelines suggest that Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) airway infection be treated with two antipseudomonal agents. METHODS: We retrospectively studied treatment responses for STOP2 PEx treatment trial (NCT02781610) participants with a history of Pa infection. Mean lung function and symptom changes from intravenous (IV) antimicrobial treatment start to Visit 2 (7 to 10 days later) were compared between those receiving one, two, and three+ antipseudomonal classes before Visit 2 by ANCOVA. Odds of PEx retreatment with IV antimicrobials within 30 days and future IV-treated PEx hazard were modeled by logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression, respectively. Sensitivity analyses limited to the most common one-, two-, and three-class regimens, to only IV/oral antipseudomonal treatments, and with more stringent Pa infection definitions were conducted. RESULTS: Among 751 participants, 50 (6.7%) were treated with one antipseudomonal class before Visit 2, while 552 (73.5%) and 149 (19.8%) were treated with two and with three+ classes, respectively. Females and participants with a negative Pa culture in the prior month were more likely to be treated with a single class. The most common single, double, and triple class regimens were beta-lactam (BL; n = 42), BL/aminoglycoside (AG; n = 459), and BL/AG/fluoroquinolone (FQ; n = 73). No lung function or symptom response, odds of retreatment, or future PEx hazard differences were observed by number of antipseudomonal classes administered in primary or sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to identify additional benefit when multiple antipseudomonal classes are used to treat PEx in people with CF and Pa.

C-reactive protein (CRP) as a biomarker of pulmonary exacerbation presentation and treatment response.

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) has been proposed as a biomarker for pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) diagnosis and treatment response. CRP >75mg/L has been associated with increased risk of PEx treatment failure. We have analyzed CRP measures as biomarkers for clinical response during the STOP2 PEx study (NCT02781610). METHODS: CRP measures were collected at antimicrobial treatment start (V1), seven to 10 days later (V2), and two weeks after treatment end (V3). V1 log10CRP concentrations and log10CRP change from V1 to V3 correlations with clinical responses (changes in lung function and symptom score) were assessed by least squares regression. Odds of intravenous (IV) antimicrobial retreatment within 30 days and future PEx hazard associated with V1 and V3 CRP concentrations and V1 CRP >75 mg/L were studied by adjusted logistic regression and proportional hazards modeling, respectively. RESULTS: In all, 951 of 982 STOP2 subjects (92.7%) had CRP measures at V1. V1 log10CRP varied significantly by V1 lung function subgroup, symptom score quartile, and sex, but not by age subgroup. V1 log10CRP correlated moderately with log10CRP change at V3 (r2=0.255) but less so with lung function (r2=0.016) or symptom (r2=0.031) changes at V3. Higher V1 CRP was associated with greater response. CRP changes from V1 to V3 only weakly correlated with lung function (r2=0.061) and symptom (r2=0.066) changes. However, V3 log10CRP was associated with increased odds of retreatment (P = .0081) and future PEx hazard (P = .0114). DISCUSSION: Despite consistent trends, log10CRP change was highly variable with only limited utility as a biomarker of PEx treatment response.

Association of site of treatment with clinical outcomes following intravenous antimicrobial treatment of a pulmonary exacerbation.

BACKGROUND: In the STOP2 (Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations-2) study, intravenous (IV) antimicrobial treatment duration for adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) experiencing pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) was determined based on initial treatment response. The impact of home vs hospital care remains an important clinical question in CF. Our hypothesis was that STOP2 participants treated at home would have less improvement in lung function compared to those treated in the hospital. METHODS: Treating clinicians determined PEx treatment location, which was a stratification factor for STOP2 randomization. Lung function, weight, and symptom recovery were evaluated by treatment location. Propensity scores and inverse probability treatment weighting were used to test for differences in clinical response by treatment location. RESULTS: In all, 33% of STOP2 participants received IV antimicrobials in the hospital only, 46% both in the hospital and at home, and 21% at home only. Mean (95% CI) ppFEV1 improvement was significantly (p < 0.05) lower for those treated at home only, 5.0 (3.5, 6.5), compared with at home and in the hospital, 7.0 (5.9, 8.1), and in the hospital only, 8.0 (6.7, 9.4). Mean weight (p < 0.001) and symptom (p < 0.05) changes were significantly smaller for those treated at home only compared to those treated in the hospital only. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PEx treatment at home only, treatment in the hospital was associated with greater mean lung function, respiratory symptom, and weight improvements. The limitations of home IV therapy should be addressed in order to optimize outcomes for adults with CF treated at home.

Changes in symptom scores as a potential clinical endpoint for studies of cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbation treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Symptom improvement was assessed as changes in the Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Score (CRISS) during intravenous antimicrobial exacerbation treatments among subjects from study NCT02109822. METHODS: Median daily CRISS reduction (i.e., improvement) and covariates associated with CRISS reduction by Day 14 were assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 173 subjects, median baseline CRISS was 49 [IQR 41, 56]; 93.6% had a CRISS reduction of ≥11 (minimal clinically important difference); median time to -11 reduction was 2 days [95% CI 2, 3]. The greatest median CRISS difference from baseline, on Day 17, was -26 [-29, -23]. Odds of -26 CRISS change by Day 14 were greater in subjects with higher baseline CRISS (P=.006) and younger ages (P=.041). CONCLUSIONS: CRISS response has good dynamic range and may be a useful efficacy endpoint for PEx interventional trials. The optimal use of CRISS change as an endpoint remains uncharacterized.

Accelerated Approval or Risk Reduction? How Response Biomarkers Advance Therapeutics through Clinical Trials in Cystic Fibrosis.

Progress in the development of new therapies for cystic fibrosis (CF) has benefited from therapeutically responsive biomarkers to streamline drug development. Paradoxically, these response biomarkers have been proven to be essential even in the presence of data demonstrating a lack of correlation with clinical outcomes across individuals with CF. This finding is unsurprising, particularly in the setting of a rare disease given complex disease processes and an often-limited pool of clinically effective therapies by which to link biomarkers and clinical responsiveness. While many response biomarkers will be unable to progress from their status as markers of biological efficacy to either established correlates of clinical efficacy or surrogate endpoints, they remain critical to the overall success of therapeutic development.

Building global development strategies for cf therapeutics during a transitional cftr modulator era.

As CFTR modulator therapy transforms the landscape of cystic fibrosis (CF) care, its lack of uniform access across the globe combined with the shift towards a new standard of care creates unique challenges for the development of future CF therapies. The advancement of a full and promising CF therapeutics pipeline remains a necessary priority to ensure maximal clinical benefits for all people with CF. It is through collaboration across the global CF community that we can optimize the evaluation and approval process of new therapies. To this end, we must identify areas for which harmonization is lacking and for which efficiencies can be gained to promote ethical, feasible, and credible study designs amidst the changing CF care landscape. This article summarizes the counsel from core advisors across multiple international regions and clinical trial networks, developed during a one-day workshop in October 2019. The goal of the workshop was to identify, in consideration of the highly transitional era of CFTR modulator availability, the drug development areas for which global alignment is currently uncertain, and paths forward that will enable advancement of CF therapeutic development.

Efficacy and safety of ataluren in patients with nonsense-mutation cystic fibrosis not receiving chronic inhaled aminoglycosides: The international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Ataluren Confirmatory Trial in Cystic Fibrosis (ACT CF).

BACKGROUND: Ataluren was developed for potential treatment of nonsense-mutation cystic fibrosis (CF). A previous phase 3 ataluren study failed to meet its primary efficacy endpoint, but post-hoc analyses suggested that aminoglycosides may have interfered with ataluren's action. Thus, this subsequent trial (NCT02139306) was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ataluren in patients with nonsense-mutation CF not receiving aminoglycosides. METHODS: Eligible subjects with nonsense-mutation CF (aged ≥6 years; percent predicted (pp) FEV1 ≥40 and ≤90) from 75 sites in 16 countries were randomly assigned in double-blinded fashion to receive oral ataluren or matching placebo thrice daily for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was absolute change in average ppFEV1 from baseline to the average of Weeks 40 and 48. FINDINGS: 279 subjects were enrolled; 138 subjects in the ataluren arm and 136 in the placebo arm were evaluable for efficacy. Absolute ppFEV1 change from baseline did not differ significantly between the ataluren and placebo groups at Week 40 (-0.8 vs -1.8) or Week 48 (-1.7 vs -2.4). Average ppFEV1 treatment difference from baseline to Weeks 40 and 48 was 0.6 (95% CI -1.3, 2.5; p = 0.54). Pulmonary exacerbation rate per 48 weeks was not significantly different (ataluren 0.95 vs placebo 1.13; rate ratio p = 0.40). Safety was similar between groups. No life-threatening adverse events or deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Neither ppFEV1 change nor pulmonary exacerbation rate over 48 weeks were statistically different between ataluren and placebo groups. Development of a nonsense-mutation CF therapy remains elusive.

Microbiological changes observed over 48 weeks of treatment with inhaled liposomal ciprofloxacin in individuals with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection.

OBJECTIVES: Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE) with Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been associated with increased pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) and mortality risk. European Respiratory Society guidelines conditionally recommend inhaled antimicrobials for persons with NCFBE, P aeruginosa and three or more PEx/year. We report microbiological results of two randomized, 48-week placebo-controlled trials of ARD-3150 (inhaled liposomal ciprofloxacin) in individuals with NCFBE with P aeruginosa and PEx history [Lancet Respir Med 2019;7:213-26]. METHODS: Respiratory secretions from 582 participants receiving up to six 28-day on/off treatment cycles were analysed for sputum P. aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli densities, P. aeruginosa susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin and nine other antimicrobials, and prevalence of other bacterial opportunists. Associations between PEx risk and sputum density, antimicrobial susceptibility and opportunist prevalence changes were studied. RESULTS: Sputum P. aeruginosa density reductions from baseline after ARD-3150 treatments ranged from 1.77 (95% CI 2.13-1.40) versus 0.54 (95% CI 0.89-0.19) log10 CFU/g for placebo (second period) to 2.07 (95% CI 2.45-1.69) versus 0.70 (95% CI 1.11-0.29) log10 CFU/g for placebo (fourth period) with only modest correlation between density reduction magnitude and PEx benefit. ARD-3150 (but not placebo) treatment was associated with increased P. aeruginosa ciprofloxacin MIC but not emergence of other bacterial opportunists across the study; ciprofloxacin MIC50 increased from 0.5 to 1 mg/L, MIC90 increased from 4 to 16 mg/L. Other antimicrobial MIC were mostly unaffected. CONCLUSION: Microbiological changes over 48 weeks of ARD-3150 treatment appear modest. Ciprofloxacin susceptibility (but not other antimicrobial susceptibility) decreases were observed that did not appear to preclude PEx risk reduction benefit.

KB001-A, a novel anti-inflammatory, found to be safe and well-tolerated in cystic fibrosis patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) airways infection, exuberant local inflammation, and progressive lung function loss are hallmarks of cystic fibrosis (CF). KB001-A is an anti-PcrV PEGylated monoclonal antibody fragment to the Type III secretion system of Pa. This 16-week study evaluated KB001-A associated effect on time-to-need for antibiotics for worsening respiratory signs and symptoms, as well as safety, and treatment-associated changes in symptom scores, inflammatory markers, and spirometry. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeat-dose study in CF subjects with Pa. Intravenous 10mg/kg KB001-A or placebo infusions were administered at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, and 16, with a 4-week follow-up. Sputum inflammatory markers were assessed in a sub-study. Time-to-need for antibiotics was compared between groups by Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling adjusting for randomization strata. RESULTS: Of 182 subjects, 169 received at least one infusion of KB001-A (n=83) or placebo (n=86). KB001-A was generally safe and well-tolerated as compared to placebo, with no significant emergent adverse effects other than one serious adverse event of elevated hepatic enzymes of unclear etiology. Time to need for antibiotics did not differ between groups (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.69, 1.45, p=0.995). A 3.2 increase in ppFEV1 from placebo favoring KB001-A was observed at week 16 (95% CI: 1.12, 5.30, p=0.003). Mean changes from baseline in log10 sputum neutrophil elastase (NE) had a non-significant decrease (-0.27, 95% CI: -0.58,0.04, p=0.084) while IL-8 concentrations at week 16 were significantly lower (-0.27, 95% CI: -0.55,0.00, p=0.048) among KB001-A subjects (n=16) relative to placebo (n=13). CONCLUSIONS: KB001-A was safe and well-tolerated and associated with a modest FEV1 benefit and reduction in select sputum inflammatory markers (IL-8). KB001-A was not associated with an increased time to need for antibiotics. The lack of efficacy seen with KB001-A may be due, in part, to the low levels of the type III secretion proteins previously reported in sputum of CF patients chronically infected with Pa.

Rationalizing endpoints for prospective studies of pulmonary exacerbation treatment response in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Given the variability in pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) management within and between Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Care Centers, it is possible that some approaches may be superior to others. A challenge with comparing different PEx management approaches is lack of a community consensus with respect to treatment-response metrics. In this analysis, we assess the feasibility of using different response metrics in prospective randomized studies comparing PEx treatment protocols. METHODS: Response parameters were compiled from the recent STOP (Standardized Treatment of PEx) feasibility study. Pulmonary function responses (recovery of best prior 6-month and 12-month FEV1% predicted and absolute and relative FEV1% predicted improvement from treatment initiation) and sign and symptom recovery from treatment initiation (measured by the Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Score [CRISS]) were studied as categorical and continuous variables. The proportion of patients retreated within 30days after the end of initial treatment was studied as a categorical variable. Sample sizes required to adequately power prospective 1:1 randomized superiority and non-inferiority studies employing candidate endpoints were explored. RESULTS: The most sensitive endpoint was mean change in CRISS from treatment initiation, followed by mean absolute FEV1% predicted change from initiation, with the two responses only modestly correlated (R2=.157; P<0.0001). Recovery of previous best FEV1 was a problematic endpoint due to missing data and a substantial proportion of patients beginning PEx treatment with FEV1 exceeding their previous best measures (12.1% >12-month best, 19.6% >6-month best). Although mean outcome measures deteriorated approximately 2-weeks post-treatment follow-up, the effect was non-uniform: 62.7% of patients experienced an FEV1 worsening versus 49.0% who experienced a CRISS worsening. CONCLUSIONS: Results from randomized prospective superiority and non-inferiority studies employing mean CRISS and FEV1 change from treatment initiation should prove compelling to the community. They will need to be large, but appear feasible.

Probability of IV antibiotic retreatment within thirty days is associated with duration and location of IV antibiotic treatment for pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: There are few objective data to guide management of cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations. We studied intravenous (IV) antibiotic treatment failure as defined by a need to retreat patients with IV antibiotics within 30days of completion of a prior IV antibiotic treatment for pulmonary exacerbation. METHODS: The first IV-treated exacerbation on or after Jan. 1, 2010 among US CF Foundation Patient Registry patients was studied, combining treatments separated by <7days into single treatments. IV treatment duration categories were: 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-22, and ≥23days (inclusive). Logistic regressions for IV retreatment in ≤30days were adjusted with 12 categorical covariates, including age, sex, lung function, prior-year exacerbations, CF complications, CF Care Program, and ever/never treated in hospital. RESULTS: 777 of 13,579 patients (5.7%) were retreated within 30days, with incidence varying by treatment duration: 1-4days, 8.7%; 5-8days; 6.6%; 9-12days, 3.2%; 13-16days, 4.5%; 17-22days, 6.2%; ≥23days, 10.3% and hospitalization: ever, 5.0%; never 8.5%. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for retreatment (compared to 13-16days treatment) were: 1-4days, 1.94 [95%CI 1.49, 2.54] P<.001; 5-8days, 1.55 [1.18, 2.04] P=.002; 9-12days, 0.78 [0.58, 1.04] P=.09; 17-22days, 1.12 [0.88, 1.42] P=.37; ≥23days, 1.46 [1.12, 1.91] P=.005. Adjusted retreatment OR for never/ever hospitalized was 1.57 [1.29, 1.90] P<.001. Prior-year exacerbation number, oxygen therapy, non-invasive ventilation, and female sex were significantly associated with retreatment. Modeling hazard rate time-dependence showed that treatment duration and location-associated hazard rates attenuated within a few months after treatment. CONCLUSION: After adjustment for covariates known to be associated with increased risk of IV treatment for exacerbation, IV antibiotic treatments of <9 and ≥23days and those without hospitalization were significant risk factors for IV retreatment within 30days of completion of an exacerbation treatment.

Design and powering of cystic fibrosis clinical trials using pulmonary exacerbation as an efficacy endpoint.

BACKGROUND: Reduction in pulmonary exacerbations is an important efficacy endpoint for CF clinical studies. Powering exacerbation endpoints requires estimation of the future exacerbation incidence in CF study populations, but rates differ across the population. METHODS: We have estimated exacerbation rates for Epidemiologic Study of CF subpopulations stratified by age, FEV(1)% predicted, sex, weight-for-age percentile, respiratory signs and symptoms, and history of exacerbation and bacterial culture. Sample sizes required to attain 80% power to detect exacerbation reductions of 20% to 80% in 1:1 randomized studies of 3 to 12 month duration were determined. Exacerbation treatments with "any" antibiotic (new oral quinolone, new inhaled antibiotic, or intravenous (IV) antibiotic) and with IV antibiotics were studied. RESULTS: At all ages, decreased FEV(1), female sex, exacerbation history, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa culture history were associated with increased treatment for exacerbation. CONCLUSIONS: These data should assist investigators in the design of future CF exacerbation studies.

Design and powering of cystic fibrosis clinical trials using rate of FEV(1) decline as an efficacy endpoint.

BACKGROUND: Rate of lung function decline (RLFD) (as FEV(1) percent predicted/yr) is a robust measure of CF therapeutic efficacy rarely used as a study endpoint, in part due to uncertainty of sample size requirements. METHODS: Sample size requirements for 1:1 randomizations to detect RLFD treatment effects from 20% to 80% were assessed in Epidemiologic Study of CF (ESCF) patients. Effects of measuring FEV(1) 1-4 times per year in studies of 1- to 4-year durations were assessed in 399 patients age ≥ 6 years with FEV(1) ≥ 70%. Impacts of inclusion/exclusion based on risk factors in 2369 ESCF patients were assessed over 1.5 years using semi-annual FEV(1) measures. RESULTS: Increasing study duration and exclusion of lower risk patients (e.g., no P. aeruginosa infection) both substantially reduced requirements. CONCLUSIONS: CF RLFD studies of 1.5 years in duration appear feasible provided that investigators account for the beneficial effects of subject inclusion/exclusion based on risk factors in power estimates.

The Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome: how do we use it to develop strategies for the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis and Pseudomonas infections?

In the 2 years since the complete sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1 was published, at least 200 papers have been published describing research that made use of the PAO1 genome sequence. Some of this research included genome-wide studies of gene expression or the effect of mutation on bacterial functions such as biofilm formation; this type of global analysis would not have been possible without the availability of the sequence. As a result of these and other, more traditional, research studies, there is a wealth of new knowledge about the physiology of this pathogen. This raises the possibility of new strategies for the treatment of patients with P. aeruginosa infection, either by novel antibiotics or by drugs targeting bacterial functions essential for survival and virulence in the human host.

A small-molecule nitroimidazopyran drug candidate for the treatment of tuberculosis.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which causes tuberculosis, is the greatest single infectious cause of mortality worldwide, killing roughly two million people annually. Estimates indicate that one-third of the world population is infected with latent M. tuberculosis. The synergy between tuberculosis and the AIDS epidemic, and the surge of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis have reaffirmed tuberculosis as a primary public health threat. However, new antitubercular drugs with new mechanisms of action have not been developed in over thirty years. Here we report a series of compounds containing a nitroimidazopyran nucleus that possess antitubercular activity. After activation by a mechanism dependent on M. tuberculosis F420 cofactor, nitroimidazopyrans inhibited the synthesis of protein and cell wall lipid. In contrast to current antitubercular drugs, nitroimidazopyrans exhibited bactericidal activity against both replicating and static M. tuberculosis. Lead compound PA-824 showed potent bactericidal activity against multidrugresistant M. tuberculosis and promising oral activity in animal infection models. We conclude that nitroimidazopyrans offer the practical qualities of a small molecule with the potential for the treatment of tuberculosis.