Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in Nucleus cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether expanded instantaneous input dynamic ranges (IIDRs) in the Nucleus cochlear implant system benefit speech perception in the laboratory and listening in the real world. DESIGN: Until recently, Nucleus cochlear implants have used an IIDR of approximately 30 dB. In this study, an IIDR of 31 dB was compared with 46 dB and 56 dB in the SPEAR3 research processor with nine adult implant recipients. Subjects were given two, 2-wk blocks of take-home experience with each of the three IIDRs. A single IIDR setting was used in each trial period. During the take-home experience with the expanded IIDRs, subjects used two programs: a standard program (with clinically measured electrode dynamic ranges) and a program with adjusted thresholds (decreased T levels). After each block of take-home experience, speech perception testing was conducted for CNC words in quiet (at 45 dB and 55 dB SPL) and for CUNY sentences in the presence of multi-taker babble. RESULTS: On average, CNC word recognition at low presentation levels was significantly better with the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDRs, compared with the 31 dB IIDR; however, there was no significant difference between the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDR conditions. These benefits were greater for standard programs than for reduced T level programs. For CUNY sentences in babble, group results indicated no significant difference in performance across IIDR. The three IIDRs were rated similarly in real-life listening situations, and two of the subjects expressed tolerance problems with the expanded standard IIDRs. CONCLUSIONS: IIDRs of 46 and 56 dB provided benefit in accessing low-level speech without a decrement in sentence perception in babble. Most subjects accepted the standard, wider IIDR programs in everyday life. No significant differences were found between the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDR programs.

Emphasis of short-duration acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users.

A new speech-coding strategy for cochlear implant users, called the transient emphasis spectral maxima (TESM), was developed to aid perception of short-duration transient cues in speech. Speech-perception scores using the TESM strategy were compared to scores using the spectral maxima sound processor (SMSP) strategy in a group of eight adult users of the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant system. Significant improvements in mean speech-perception scores for the group were obtained on CNC open-set monosyllabic word tests in quiet (SMSP: 53.6% TESM: 61.3%, p<0.001), and on MUSL open-set sentence tests in multitalker noise (SMSP: 64.9% TESM: 70.6%, p<0.001). Significant increases were also shown for consonant scores in the word test (SMSP: 75.1% TESM: 80.6%, p<0.001) and for vowel scores in the word test (SMSP: 83.1% TESM: 85.7%, p<0.05). Analysis of consonant perception results from the CNC word tests showed that perception of nasal, stop, and fricative consonant discrimination was most improved. Information transmission analysis indicated that place of articulation was most improved, although improvements were also evident for manner of articulation. The increases in discrimination were shown to be related to improved coding of short-duration acoustic cues, particularly those of low intensity.

Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of varying electrical stimulation rate on speech comprehension by cochlear implant users, while keeping the number of stimulated channels constant. DESIGN: Three average rates of electrical stimulation, 250, 807, and 1615 pulses per second per channel (pps/ch), were compared using a speech processing strategy that employed an electrode selection technique similar to that used in the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor strategy (McDermott, McKay, & Vandali, 1992; McDermott & Vandali, Reference Note 1; McKay, McDermott, Vandali, & Clark, 1991) and the Spectral Peak strategy (Skinner et al., 1994; Whitford et al., 1995). Speech perception tests with five users of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system were conducted over a 21-wk period. Subjects were given take-home experience with each rate condition. A repeated ABC evaluation protocol with alternating order was employed so as to account for learning effects and to minimize order effects. Perception of open-set monosyllabic words in quiet and open-set sentences at signal to noise ratios ranging from +20 to 0 dB, depending on the subject's ability, were tested. A comparative performance questionnaire was also administered. RESULTS: No statistical differences in group performance between the 250 and 807 pps/ch rates were observed in any of the speech perception tests. However, significantly poorer group performance was observed for the 1615 pps/ch rate for some tests due predominantly to the results of one subject. Analysis of individual scores showed considerable variation across subjects. For some subjects, one or more of the three rate conditions evaluated provided benefits on some speech perception tasks. The results of the comparative performance questionnaire indicated a preference for the 250 and 807 pps/ch rates over the 1615 pps/ch rate for most listening situations. CONCLUSIONS: For the speech processing strategy, implant system, and subjects evaluated in this study, the group results indicated that the use of electrical stimulation rates higher than 250 pps/ch (up to 1615 pps/ch) generally provided no significant improvement to speech comprehension. However, individual results indicated that perceptual benefits could be obtained by adjusting rate of stimulation optimally to suit each subject. Results from one subject, together with tinnitus problems arising from high-rate stimulation for another subject, indicated that high rates of stimulation may in fact be undesirable for some subjects.

Speech processing for multichannel cochlear implants: variations of the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor strategy.

The Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) incorporates a bank of 16 band-pass filters which are assigned to 16 intracochlear electrodes. In each stimulation period 6 electrodes are activated, based on the outputs of the filters with the largest amplitudes. The SMSP has previously been compared with the present MSP(MULTIPEAK) processor and found to improve speech comprehension results. The SMSP speech processing scheme has recently been implemented successfully in a new speech processor, also developed at the University of Melbourne, which utilises digital signal processing techniques. The programming flexibility of this processor has facilitated the investigation of variations of the SMSP strategy which might provide further enhancement of speech perception. Three variations have been investigated: firstly, increasing the constant pulse rate from the usual 250 Hz to 400 Hz; secondly, changing the number of electrodes selected in each stimulation period from 6 to numbers between 4 and 8; thirdly, sharpening the spectral peaks prior to selection of the active electrodes. The results of these studies showed that all three variations had minimal effect on speech perception in quiet, but that increasing the number of electrodes selected for stimulation to 8, or increasing the rate of stimulation, was advantageous for some subjects when listening in background noise.

A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (MULTIPEAK) processor.

The Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) is a portable speech processor which has recently been developed at the University of Melbourne for use with multiple-electrode cochlear implants. In this processor, the six largest outputs (maxima) of 16 bandpass filters are used to stimulate the cochlea on a place basis at a constant rate. This speech processing strategy has been compared with the MSP(MULTIPEAK) strategy, in which four electrodes are selected for stimulation in every glottal pulse period. The study was undertaken on four postlinguistically deaf adults. The results show that, for this group of subjects, the performance of the SMSP processor was significantly better than that of the MSP(MULTIPEAK) processor for the recognition of closed-set vowels and consonants, open-set monosyllabic words, and open-set sentences in noise, when using electrical stimulation alone. The SMSP mean scores were: vowels 91.3%, consonants 74.9%, words 57.4%, and sentences in noise 78.7%. The MSP(MULTIPEAK) mean scores were: vowels 76.3%, consonants 59.4%, words 39.9%, and sentences in noise 50.0%.

A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant.

A new processor, called the spectral maxima sound processor (SMSP), has been developed for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant. The SMSP analyses sound signals by means of a bandpass filterbank having 16 channels which are allocated tonotopically to the implanted electrodes. Every 4 ms, typically, the six channels with the largest amplitudes are selected, and six corresponding electrodes are activated. In an ongoing study the performance of the SMSP is being compared with that of the Mini Speech Processor (MSP). Some results of speech perception tests from the first two SMSP users are presented, in which scores for the recognition of vowels, consonants, and words all showed significant increases over the corresponding MSP scores.