Cutaneous papillomavirus E6 oncoproteins associate with MAML1 to repress transactivation and NOTCH signaling.

Papillomavirus E6 oncoproteins associate with LXXLL motifs on target cellular proteins to alter their function. Using a proteomic approach, we found the E6 oncoproteins of cutaneous papillomaviruses Bovine Papillomavirus Type 1 (BPV-1) E6 and human papillomavirus (HPV) types 1 and 8 (1E6 and 8E6) associated with the MAML1 transcriptional co-activator. All three E6 proteins bind to an acidic LXXLL motif at the carboxy-terminus of MAML1 and repress transactivation by MAML1. MAML1 is best known as the co-activator and effector of NOTCH-induced transcription, and BPV-1 E6 represses synthetic NOTCH-responsive promoters, endogenous NOTCH-responsive promoters, and is found in a complex with MAML1 in stably transformed cells. BPV-1-induced papillomas show characteristics of repressed NOTCH signal transduction, including suprabasal expression of integrins, talin and basal type keratins, and delayed expression of the NOTCH-dependent HES1 transcription factor. These observations give rise to a model whereby papillomavirus oncoproteins, including BPV-1 E6, and the cancer-associated HPV-8 E6 repress NOTCH-induced transcription, thereby delaying keratinocyte differentiation.

Cooperative transformation and coexpression of bovine papillomavirus type 1 E5 and E7 proteins.

Productively infected bovine fibropapillomas were examined for bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) E7 localization. BPV-1 E7 was observed in the cytoplasm of basal and lower spinous epithelial cells, coexpressed in the cytoplasm of basal cells with the E5 oncoprotein. E7 was also observed in nucleoli throughout the basal and spinous layers but not in the granular cell layer. Ectopic expression of E7 in cultured epithelial cells gave rise to localization similar to that seen in productive fibropapillomas, with cytoplasmic and nucleolar expression observed. Consistent with the coexpression of E7 and E5 in basal keratinocytes, BPV-1 E7 cooperated with E5 as well as E6 in an anchorage independence transformation assay. While E5 is expressed in both basal and superficial differentiating keratinocytes, BPV-1 E7 is only observed in basal and lower spinous epithelial cells. Therefore, BPV-1 E7 may serve to modulate the cellular response of basal epithelial cells to E5 expression.

Competitive binding to a charged leucine motif represses transformation by a papillomavirus E6 oncoprotein.

E6 oncoproteins from HPV-16 and bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) bind to similar leucine-rich peptides termed charged leucine motifs found on the cellular focal adhesion protein paxillin and the E3 ubiquitin ligase E6AP. BPV-1 E6 (BE6) mutants that do not bind to paxillin are defective at inducing cellular transformation. It is possible, however, that BE6 mutants that do not bind paxillin are defective for transformation for an unrelated reason than the ability to bind to charged leucine motifs. To address the role of BE6 interaction with charged leucine motifs, we fused a BE6-binding charged leucine motif to the amino terminus of BE6, thereby creating an autoinhibitory binding domain. We found that the fusion protein failed to bind to paxillin or transform murine C127 cells. Mutation of the amino terminal binding motif in the fusion protein restored both interaction with paxillin and transformation. This demonstrates that BE6 transformation requires binding to charged leucine motifs on particular cellular proteins and that transformation by papillomavirus oncoproteins can be repressed by competitive interactions with charged leucine motifs.

Identification of a second transforming function in bovine papillomavirus type 1 E6 and the role of E6 interactions with paxillin, E6BP, and E6AP.

Papillomavirus E6 oncoproteins transform mammalian cells through interaction with cellular proteins. Bovine papillomavirus type 1 E6 (BE6) interacts with three previously described cellular targets: the E6AP E3 ubiquitin ligase, the calcium-binding protein E6BP (also known as ERC-55), and paxillin, which is a focal adhesion adapter protein. BE6 interacts strongly with each of these proteins in vitro, binding to similar peptide sequences found in E6AP, E6BP, and paxillin. To determine which BE6 interactions are necessary for transformation by BE6, we used a novel selection strategy for temperature-sensitive BE6 mutants in yeast that could discriminate in their interaction between E6AP, E6BP, and paxillin. All BE6 mutants that retained transforming ability retained association with paxillin, while some mutants that were transformation positive failed to interact with E6AP or E6BP. This study demonstrates that oncogene mutants that are temperature sensitive for transformation can be selected in yeast and that the induction of anchorage-independent cell proliferation by BE6 does not require strong association of BE6 with either E6AP or E6BP. Of particular interest is the identification of a BE6 mutant that interacts strongly with the acidic charged leucine motifs of E6AP, E6BP, and paxillin but is devoid of transformation activity, thereby genetically identifying a second essential transformation function in BE6 that is independent of interaction with acidic charged leucine motifs.

Association of Bovine Papillomavirus Type 1 E6 oncoprotein with the focal adhesion protein paxillin through a conserved protein interaction motif.

We have found that the E6 oncoprotein of Bovine Papillomavirus Type 1 (BE6) as well as the E6 protein of the cancer associated HPV-16 (16E6) interact with the focal adhesion protein paxillin. Mutational analysis of paxillin revealed that BE6 binds paxillin through small protein interaction motifs called LD motifs that have been previously identified as important in regulating association of paxillin with vinculin and focal adhesion kinase (FAK), and that BE6 can interact with at least two separate binding sites on paxillin. The LD motifs of paxillin that bind BE6 share homology with the E6 binding site of E6-AP, a ubiquitin ligase that together with 16E6 targets the degradation of the p53 tumor suppressor. Paxillin binding to BE6 excludes simultaneous binding to E6-AP. Mutational analysis of BE6 can distinguish the interaction of BE6 with E6-AP compared to paxillin and revealed that the interaction of BE6 with paxillin may be necessary for the induction of anchorage independent growth of cells by BE6.

The adenovirus E3-14.7K protein and the E3-10.4K/14.5K complex of proteins, which independently inhibit tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-induced apoptosis, also independently inhibit TNF-induced release of arachidonic acid.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is an inflammatory cytokine that inhibits the replication of many viruses in cultured cells. We have reported that adenovirus (Ad) infection of TNF-resistant mouse cells renders them susceptible to lysis by TNF and that two sets of proteins encoded by the E3 transcription unit block TNF cytolysis. The E3 protein sets are named E3-14.7K (14,700 kDa) and E3-10.4K/14.5K (a complex of two proteins of 10,400 and 14,500 kDa). TNF activation of the 85-kDa cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) is thought to be essential for TNF cytolysis (i.e.,TNF-induced apoptosis). Here we provide evidence that cPLA2 is important in the response of Ad-infected cells to TNF and that the mechanism by which E3-14.7K and E3-10.4K/14.5K inhibit TNF cytolysis is by inhibiting TNF activation of cPLA2. cPLA2 cleaves arachidonic acid (AA) specifically from membrane phospholipids; therefore, cPLA2 activity was measured by the release of 3H-AA from cells prelabeled with 3H-AA. Uninfected cells or cells infected with wild-type Ad were not lysed and did not release 3H-AA in response to TNF. In contrast, TNF treatment induced cytolysis and 3H-AA release in uninfected cells sensitized to TNF by treatment with cycloheximide and also in infected cells sensitized to TNF by expression of E1A. In C127 cells, in which either E3-14.7K or E3-10.4K/14.5K inhibits TNF cytolysis, either set of proteins inhibited TNF-induced release of 3H-AA. In C3HA cells, in which E3-14.7K but not E3-10.4K/14.5K prevents TNF cytolysis, E3-14.7K but not E3-10.4K/14.5K prevented TNF-induced release of 3H-AA. When five virus mutants with lesions in E3-14.7K were examined, there was a perfect correlation between a mutant's ability to inhibit both TNF-induced cytolysis and release of 3H-AA. E3-14.7K expressed in two stably transfected C127 cell lines prevented both TNF-cycloheximide-induced cytolysis and release of 3H-AA. The E3 proteins also prevented TNF-induced cytolysis and release of 3H-AA in mouse L929 cells, which are spontaneously sensitive to TNF. TNF cytolysis was blocked by dexamethasone, an inhibitor of PLA2 activity, and by nordihydroquaiaretic acid, which inhibits the metabolism of AA to the leukotrienes. Indomethacin, which blocks the formation of prostaglandins from AA, did not inhibit TNF cytolysis. The leukotrienes and prostaglandins are amplifiers of the inflammatory response. We propose that E3-14.7K and E3-10.4K/14.5K function independently in Ad infection to inhibit both cytolysis and inflammation induced by TNF.

Negative regulation of the bovine papillomavirus E5, E6, and E7 oncogenes by the viral E1 and E2 genes.

Papillomaviruses induce benign squamous epithelial lesions that infrequently are associated with uncontrolled growth or malignant conversion. The virus-encoded oncogenes are clearly under negative regulation since papillomaviruses can latently infect cells and since different levels of viral oncogene expression are seen within the layers of differentiating infected epitheliomas. We used bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) to investigate the mechanisms involved in the negative regulation of transformation. We found that the following two distinct and interacting mechanisms negatively regulate BPV-1 transformation effected by virally encoded trans-acting factors: (i) E2 repressors suppress transformation by the E6 and E7 oncogenes, and (ii) E1 and the E2 transactivator suppress transformation by the E6, E7, and E5 oncogenes. These systems interact in that the E2 repressors function to relieve the transformation suppression effected by the E1 and E2 transactivator genes. A BPV-1 mutant that lacked E2 repressors and E1 had greatly augmented transformation capacity. Analysis of this mutant revealed that the enhanced transformation was due to expression of the E6 and E7 genes in the absence of E5, revealing a previously unappreciated potency and synergy for the BPV-1 E6 and E7 oncogenes.

Repression of bovine papillomavirus type 1 transcription by the E1 replication protein.

Bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) is the prototype virus for the study of papillomavirus gene regulation. The functions of the BPV-1 E2 proteins in transcriptional regulation have been well characterized. The BPV-1 E1 protein is required for viral DNA replication and can bind to the origin of replication alone or in a complex with the E2 transactivator protein. In this study, we demonstrated that the BPV-1 E1 protein is also involved in transcriptional regulation. The E1 protein significantly repressed E2-transactivated transcription from the major early promoter P89. This activity is consistent with the elevated level of P89 transcription observed in BPV-1 E1 open reading frame mutants. Transcriptional repression by E1 correlated with the ability of an E1-E2 protein complex to bind the replication origin but was not dependent on viral DNA replication. These studies identify a new mechanism involved in the regulation of papillomavirus transcription which has implications regarding expression of the viral transforming functions.

The bovine papillomavirus constitutive enhancer is essential for viral transformation, DNA replication, and the maintenance of latency.

Bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) has served as the prototype papillomavirus for the study of viral transcription, DNA replication, and latency. However, no cis essential transcription control regions which are necessary for both transformation and replication of BPV-1 or any other papillomavirus have yet been defined. We have found that BPV-1 mutants with deletions in the long control region were defective for transformation and replication, with the essential region in the 5' long control region corresponding to the previously defined BPV-1 constitutive enhancer (S. B. Vande Pol and P. M. Howley, J. Virol. 64:5420-5429, 1990). BPV-1 mutants deleted of the constitutive enhancer could be complemented in trans by the full-length virally encoded E2 transactivator and replication factor (E2TA) and in cis by the simian virus 40 enhancer. The constitutive enhancer induced the production of E2TA by activating all the major viral early promoters upstream of the E2 open reading frame. Complementation experiments using a temperature-sensitive E2TA mutant indicated that the constitutive enhancer was necessary for the maintenance of viral DNA replication within latently infected cells and implied that viral transcription under the regulation of the constitutive enhancer may be controlled during the cell cycle. The constitutive enhancer is a master regulatory control region for establishing and maintaining BPV-1 latency, and its characteristics reveal some analogies with cell type-specific enhancer elements recognized in the human papillomaviruses.

Characterization of the cis elements involved in basal and E2-transactivated expression of the bovine papillomavirus P2443 promoter.

Transcriptional transactivation and repression by the viral E2 proteins are important regulatory mechanisms for the papillomaviruses. In the bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1), several viral promoters can be transactivated by E2 through E2-dependent enhancer elements located in the viral long control region (LCR), including promoters involved in E2 expression itself. This report demonstrates that the BPV-1 P2443 promoter is transactivated by E2-responsive elements in the LCR and that this promoter is responsible for a major part of the expression of the E2 and E5 gene products. Characterization of the cis elements involved in P2443 regulation indicated that the single E2-binding site directly upstream of P2443 is not required for either the E2 transactivation or for any E2 repression of the basal or transactivated activity of this promoter. Therefore, cooperative interactions between E2 bound at the LCR and E2 bound near P2443 do not have any role in the regulation of this promoter. Further definition of the cis regulatory elements of this promoter indicated that a binding site for the transcriptional factor Sp1 exists directly upstream of the P2443 TATA box and is critical for the basal level of transcription from this promoter. Disruption of this Sp1 site eliminated P2443 promoter activity in transient expression assays for E2 and E5 and resulted in a loss of transforming activity when introduced into the full viral genome.

A bovine papillomavirus constitutive enhancer is negatively regulated by the E2 repressor through competitive binding for a cellular factor.

The bovine papillomavirus type 1 long control region (LCR) contains DNA sequence elements involved in the regulation of viral transcription and replication. Differences in the levels of transcription have previously been noted between bovine papillomavirus type 1-infected rodent cell lines and bovine cells. To investigate these differences, fragments of the LCR were cloned into an enhancer-deleted chloramphenicol acetyltransferase expression vector and assayed for enhancer activity. A strong constitutive enhancer was found in the 5' portion of the LCR that was most active in primary bovine fibroblasts and had little activity in other cell types. Deletion mapping localized most of the activity to a 113-bp fragment from nucleotides (nt) 7162 to 7275, a region of the viral sequence that also contains the P7185 promoter and an E2-binding site at nt 7203. The enhancer activity of this element could be positively modulated by the full-length E2 transactivator or negatively modulated by the E2 repressor. Site-directed mutagenesis defined two cis elements, CE1 and CE2, which were both necessary for enhancer activity. The CE1 element was required for P7185 activity, whereas the CE2 element was dispensable for P7185 activity. The CE1 and CE2 elements both overlap the E2-binding site at nt 7203. In vitro DNA-binding studies revealed (i) a specific gel retardation complex associated with cellular factor binding at the CE1 element, (ii) a correlation between enhancer activity and the binding of factors to the CE1 element, and (iii) competitive binding between the E2 repressor and the cellular factor at the CE1 element.