Women 50 Years and Older With Negative Pap Test and Positive Human Papillomavirus Test for Genotypes Other Than 16 and 18-Follow-up Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: A follow-up of women 50 years or older with concomitant positive high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes other than 16 and 18 (hrHPVO) and negative Pap test (NILMPap) was conducted to better understand the implications of hrHPVO positivity on potential risk of developing significant high-grade lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 2014 cytology data of patients with co-testing (Pap test and HPV DNA) identified 85 women 50 years or older with NILMPap and hrHPVO+. RESULTS: Most patients (63) had repeat co-testing on next follow-up. Of these, 41 patients with persistent hrHPVO+ status, 3 developed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2), and 1 CIN3. Nineteen patients were followed with biopsies. Of these, 7 biopsies were abnormal, 5 of which showed low-grade (CIN1) and 2 high-grade (CIN3) histology; none progressed on further follow-up. Three patients were followed with Pap test only, all had NILMPap, and none progressed on further follow-up. In summary, of the 85 patients, 26 developed abnormal histology during follow-up, 6 of whom had high-grade histology (CIN2 and CIN3, 3 each).The 5-year risk of CIN1+ in this cohort was 43.8% and for CIN2+ was 12.3%. The risk of abnormal histology did not differ significantly by prior history of Pap tests, histology, and/or HPV results. CONCLUSIONS: A persistent positivity for hrHPVO indicated higher likelihood to develop a lesion, and this risk was not reduced for patients 50 and older compared with the published screening population risk.

Results from the 2019 American Society of Cytopathology survey on rapid on-site evaluation-Part 1: objective practice patterns.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a service provided by cytologists that helps ensure specimen adequacy and appropriate triage for ancillary testing. However, data on the current usage patterns across different practice settings have been lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To obtain an accurate and timely assessment of the current state of practice of ROSE, a 14-question online survey was constructed by the Clinical Practice Committee of the American Society for Cytopathology. The survey was available to the membership of the American Society for Cytopathology for a 3-week period in early 2019. RESULTS: A total of 541 responses were received, including from 255 cytopathologists/pathologists, 261 cytotechnologists, 19 cytology resident/fellow trainees, and 6 others. ROSE was offered as a clinical service by 95.4% of the respondents, with telecytology for ROSE used in 21.9% of the practices. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration was the procedure most frequently reported to use ROSE (mean, 59.1%; median, 70%). Cytotechnologists were involved in ROSE in most practices. The number of daily ROSE procedures correlated with the annual nongynecologic cytology volumes. Approximately 70% of ROSE procedures were reported to require >30 minutes, on average, for the cytologist. CONCLUSIONS: The results from our survey of cytologists have shown that the reported practice patterns for the usage of ROSE vary considerably. The presented data can help inform future guideline recommendations and the implementation of ROSE in different clinical settings.