Hard to Swallow: A Review of Interventions to Improve Swallowing Solid Medication.

Solid oral medications are preferred over intravenous or liquid formulations; however, difficulty swallowing solid medication remains a common barrier to adherence. Previous reviews have demonstrated limited evidence on interventions to improve solid medication swallowing abilities. PubMed, Medline (OVID), CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for interventions to improve the pediatric population's ability to swallow solid medications. We included studies in English published after the latest review, from January 2014 through April 2022, with pediatric patients not having comorbid conditions affecting swallowing ability. The authors independently reviewed each study's sampling strategy, study design, and the strength of outcome measures and assigned a numerical rating representing "poor," "fair," or "good" for each category. Individual ratings were averaged per category and a final quality rating score given based on the average of all 3 categories. Our search identified 581 unique records; 10 were included in the final review. Interventions varied and included behavioral therapies and novel products or medication formulations. Three received a "good" quality rating, 5 were "fair," and 2 were "poor." All studies showed their intervention(s) to be successful in improving a child's ability to swallow solid oral medications. Despite the availability of several different effective interventions, pediatric providers do not routinely address patients' difficulty with swallowing solid oral medications. Patients would benefit from implementation of a universal screening process followed by a guideline for appropriate patient-centered interventions; the opportunity exists to use this process as a national quality benchmark reflecting institutional commitment to high-value care.

Flexible Bronchoscopy in Pediatric Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with ARDS will on occasion need venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for organ support. As these patients recover, they may benefit from lung recruitment maneuvers including flexible bronchoscopy (FB). The objective of this study was to assess the clinical course of patients who underwent FB while on VV-ECMO for ARDS. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective multi-center cohort at 10 United States pediatric academic quaternary care centers. Data were collected on 204 subjects age 14 d-18 y on VV-ECMO. RESULTS: 271 FBs were performed on 129 (63%) subjects. Pre-FB tidal volume was 1.8 mL/kg compared to 2.22 mL/kg following FB (P = .007). Dynamic compliance also improved from pre-FB to post-FB (2.23 vs 3.04 mL/cm H2O, P = .005). There was a low incidence of complications following FB (3.1%). Subjects in the FB group had fewer ECMO-free days (EFDs) (17.9 vs 22.1 d, P < .001), fewer ventilator-free days (VFDs) (40.0 vs 46.5 d, P = .001), and longer ICU length of stay (LOS) (18 vs 32 d, P < .001). Subjects in the early versus late FB group had more EFDs (19.4 vs 15.2 d, P = .003), more VFDs (43.0 vs 34.0 d, P = .004), and shorter ICU LOS (27.5 vs 35.5 d, P = .045). Mortality in the subjects who had at least one FB was 27.1% compared to 40% in the subjects who did not have a FB while on VV-ECMO (P = .057). CONCLUSIONS: FB can be performed on patients while anticoagulated on VV-ECMO with a low incidence of complications. FB may be beneficial especially when performed early in the course of VV-ECMO.