A decrease in peripheral thyroid hormone conversion efficiency in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and L-T3 as a possible alternative therapeutic escape option.

Hypothyroidism is a frequently occurring side effect in patients under treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Actually, the origin of hypothyroidism with ICI use is classified as a primary (thyroid) or as secondary/tertiary hypothyroidism (hypothalamus-pituitary). Treatment consists of levothyroxine (L-T4) substitution. Recently, we were rarely confronted with a clinically overt hypothyroidism in three patients under treatment with ICIs who were non-responsive to T4 therapy. As a therapeutical escape, liothyronine (L-T3) was started with a significant clinical and/or biochemical improvement suggesting an underlying functional defect in the peripheral free T4 (fT4) to free T3 (fT3) conversion (as supported by calculation of SPINA-GD). Against this background, we discussed our three patients along an extended review of this clinical topic.

Coping Strategy Influences Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer by Mediating Mood.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced lung cancer experience high physical symptom burden with substantial psychological distress. Depressive and anxiety symptoms are common and associated with worse quality of life (QoL). Early palliative care (EPC) addresses the complex supportive care needs improving QoL and mood. The mechanisms of EPC are uncertain. We examined whether and how coping strategy, a primary component of EPC, influenced QoL in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study of patients with advanced lung cancer. A total of 125 patients completed assessments of QoL (QLQ-C15-PAL), depressive and anxiety symptoms (HADS), and coping (brief COPE questionnaire). The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. To determine whether and how coping strategy influences QoL, correlations and logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS: Positive reframing correlates significantly with global QoL (r = 0.25, P < .01), emotional well-being (r = 0.33, P < .01), pain (r = -0.30, P < .01), fatigue (r = -0.22, P < .01), loss of appetite (r = -0.22, P < .01) and nausea (r = -0.24, P < .01). Self-blame correlates significantly with worse emotional well-being (r = -0.19, P < .05) and insomnia (r = 0.19, P < .05). Using a 4-step logistic regression model, it was found that anxiety and depressive symptoms fully mediated the relationship between positive reframing and QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced lung cancer using positive reframing as coping strategy, experience higher QoL. The mechanism behind it seems that positive reframing goes along with less anxiety and depressive symptoms leading to a better QoL. Self-blame leads to more insomnia and worse emotional well-being. Providing skills to cope effectively could impact QoL in these patients.

Prognostic Understanding and Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: Communication about the palliative setting remains a barrier for many physicians because they are afraid to harm the patient by giving bad news. We sought to determine whether this a valid concern; the influence of prognostic understanding on patients' quality of life (QoL); and which factors influence this relationship. METHODS: The present multicenter, cross-sectional study used a questionnaire to measure patients' prognostic understanding, QoL, mood, and coping strategy. RESULTS: We surveyed 125 patients with advanced lung cancer. Prognostic understanding correlated significantly with emotional well-being (r = -0.20; P = .01) and pain (r = 0.43; P = .00) but not with anxiety (r = 0.12, P = .12) or depression (r = 0.05; P = .29). Patients with anxiety (r = -0.23; P = .01) and patients with depressive feelings (r = -0.63; P = .00) experienced poorer QoL. Four in 10 patients reported feelings of anxiety and/or depression. Positive reframing as a coping strategy was associated with a better QoL (r = 0.25; P = .00). CONCLUSION: Prognostic understanding was related to poorer emotional well-being and more pain but does not affect mood. Four in 10 patients reported feelings of anxiety and/or depression, which were associated with a poorer QoL. A holistic approach seems necessary when physicians communicate about the palliative setting.

Addressing the Palliative Setting in Advanced Lung Cancer Should Not Remain a Barrier: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of early palliative care (EPC) into daily oncology practice remains difficult. One of the barriers preventing oncologists from starting EPC is open communication about the palliative setting. The aim of this study was to investigate the relevance of this communication barrier. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional multicenter study, 106 patients with advanced thoracic cancer were issued a questionnaire to survey 3 dimensions of interest: illness understanding, observation of conversation regarding prognosis and end-of-life (EoL) care, and information preferences of the patients. RESULTS: Only 45% of subjects were aware that their treatment was not curative. When comparing presumed treatment goals between patients who were aware that their treatment could not cure them and patients likely to think that their treatment could cure them, 39% of the former chose quality of life versus 9% of the latter, whereas 36% of the former chose cure versus 13% of the latter (χ2 = 17.7, P = .001). Seventy-five percent never had a conversation about EoL care. More than 50% found a discussion about prognosis and EoL care to be very important. CONCLUSION: This study reveals the existence of a communication barrier and underlines the importance of sustained emphasis with regard to the palliative intent of the treatment. Patients who are aware that they could not be cured were more aware of the primary goal of their treatment, namely quality of life. Most patients did not discuss prognosis and EoL care despite their wish for such a communication.

What is the role for surgery in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a therapeutic challenge. Although combined modality has become the standard treatment in stage III NSCLC, the role of surgery in it remains controversial. This review will address recent evidence on the potential role of surgery in either superior sulcus tumors, T4N0-1 tumors with central extension multifocal tumors with nodule(s) in the same lobe, or stage III disease with mediastinal lymph node involvement. RECENT FINDINGS: Two recent phase 2 trials, exploring surgical resection preceded by induction chemoradiotherapy for tumors of the superior sulcus, have reported an impressive survival with acceptable mortality rate. They confirm the outcome observed in other prospective and retrospective series for T3-4N0-1. For subsets of T4 NSCLC with central extension or with satellite nodule(s) in the primary lobe, cumulative data suggest that these tumors behave differently than other stage IIIB tumors and might benefit from upfront surgery, possibly followed by postoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Whenever clinical mediastinal lymph node invasion is present, surgery after induction treatment is not proven superior to radiotherapy, and is best restricted to clinical trials. SUMMARY: Combined modality treatment is the standard of care for locally advanced NSCLC and the optimal role for surgery remains a challenging issue for the clinicians.