Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg ; 58(2): 101-5, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17710897

ABSTRACT

Although epidural anesthesia is considered safe, several complications may occur during puncture and insertion of a catheter. Incidences of paresthesia vary between 0.2 and 56%. A prospective, open, cohort-controlled pilot study was conducted in 188 patients, ASA I-III, age 19-87 years, scheduled for elective surgery and epidural anesthesia. We evaluated a 20 G polyamide (standard) catheter and a 20 G combined polyurethane-polyamide (new) catheter. Spontaneous reactions upon catheter-insertion, paresthesia on questioning, inadvertent dural or intravascular puncture, and reasons for early catheter removal were recorded. The incidence of paresthesia reported spontaneously was 21.3% with the standard catheter and 16.7% with the new catheter. Systematically asking for paresthesia almost doubled the paraesthesia rate. Intravascular cannulation occurred in 5%. No accidental dural punctures occurred. An overall incidence of 13.3% of technical problems led to early catheter removal. The new catheter was at least equivalent to the standard regarding epidural success rate and safety : rate of paresthesia, intravascular and dural cannulation.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Epidural/instrumentation , Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheterization/instrumentation , Paresthesia/etiology , Paresthesia/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paresthesia/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...