Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatrics ; 124(2): e339-46, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19620189

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We describe videolaryngoscopy equipment and technique for endotracheal intubation and airway evaluation in the delivery room (DR) and NICU for endotracheal intubation and airway evaluation. We report our first experience of 47 patients. METHODS: Forty-seven infants who weighed 530 to 6795 g and required endotracheal intubation or airway evaluation were considered for intubation or assessment by using the modified Kaplan-Berci videolaryngoscope. We report quality-improvement data after initial introduction of newly approved technology. RESULTS: We report results of 48 intubations in 42 patients and videolaryngoscopic inspection without intubation in 5 patients. Five intubation attempts were successful after failed attempts by experienced intubators; 6 attempts by residents were completed with video guidance rather than requiring an additional attempt. Only 3 intubations required more than 2 attempts. Enlarged panoramic view and recording assisted in correct diagnosis of vocal cord paralysis. The features and main advantages are discussed in detail. No complications or difficulties resulting from the technology occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This new technique and technology show promise to improve airway management, evaluation, and teaching. Future research to validate improved intubation success in difficult airways and in teaching situations is warranted.


Subject(s)
Delivery Rooms , Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Laryngoscopes , Video Recording/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Internship and Residency , Laryngeal Edema/diagnosis , Suction/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome , Vocal Cord Paralysis/diagnosis
2.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 34(3): 196-202, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12203848

ABSTRACT

Bedside pulmonary mechanics monitors (PMM) have become useful in ventilatory management in neonates. These monitors are used more frequently due to recent improvements in data-processing capabilities. PMM devices are often part of the ventilator or are separate units. The accuracy and reliability of these systems have not been carefully evaluated. We compared a single ventilatory parameter, tidal volume (V(t)), as measured by several systems. We looked at two freestanding PMMs: the Ventrak Respiratory Monitoring System (Novametrix, Wallingford, CT) and the Bicore CP-100 Neonatal Pulmonary Monitor (Allied Health Care Products, Riverside, CA), and three ventilators with built-in PMM: the VIP Bird Ventilator (Bird Products Corp., Palm Springs, CA), Siemens Servo 300A (Siemens-Elema AB, Solna, Sweden), and Drager Babylog 8000 (Drager, Inc., Chantilly, VA). A calibrated syringe (Hans Rudolph, Inc., Kansas City, MO) was used to deliver tidal volumes of 4, 10, and 20 mL to each ventilator system coupled with a freestanding PMM. After achieving steady state, six consecutive V(t) readings were taken simultaneously from the freestanding PMM and each ventilator. In a second portion of the bench study, we used pressure-control ventilation and measured exhaled tidal volume (V(te)) while ventilating a Bear Test Lung with the same three ventilators. We adjusted peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) under controlled conditions to achieve the three different targeted tidal volumes on the paired freestanding PMM. Again, six V(te) measurements were recorded for each tidal volume. Means and standard deviations were calculated.The percentage difference in measurement of V(t) delivered by calibrated syringe varied greatly, with the greatest discrepancy seen in the smallest tidal volumes, by up to 28%. In pressure control mode, V(te) as measured by the Siemens was significantly overestimated by 20-95%, with the biggest discrepancy at the smallest V(te), particularly when paired with the Bicore PMM. V(te), as measured by the VIP Bird and Drager paired with the Ventrak PMM, had a tendency to underestimate V(t) by up to 25% at the smallest V(te). However, when paired with the Bicore PMM, these same two ventilators read over target by up to 18%. Under controlled laboratory conditions, we demonstrated that true delivered V(te), as measured by the three ventilators and two freestanding PMM, differed markedly. In general, decreasing dynamic compliance of the tubing was not associated with greater inaccuracy in V(te) measurements.


Subject(s)
Ventilators, Mechanical , Calibration , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Reproducibility of Results , Tidal Volume
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...