Randomized trial of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution as an alternative to blood transfusion after cardiac surgery. The DCLHb Cardiac Surgery Trial Collaborative Group.

BACKGROUND: Risks associated with transfusion of allogeneic blood have prompted development of methods to avoid or reduce blood transfusions. New oxygen-carrying compounds such as diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin (DCLHb) could enable more patients to avoid allogeneic blood transfusion. METHODS: The efficacy, safety, hemodynamic effects, and plasma persistence of DCLHb were investigated in a randomized, active-control, single-blind, multicenter study in post-cardiac bypass surgery patients. Of 1,956 screened patients, 209 were determined to require a blood transfusion and met the inclusion criteria during the 24-h post-cardiac bypass period. These patients were randomized to receive up to three 250-ml infusions of DCLHb (n = 104) or three units of packed erythrocytes (pRBCs; n = 105). Further transfusions of pRBCs or whole blood were permitted, if indicated. Primary efficacy end points were the avoidance of blood transfusion through hospital discharge or 7 days postsurgery, whichever came first, and a reduction in the number of units of pRBCs transfused during this same time period. Various laboratory, physiologic, and hemodynamic parameters were monitored to define the safety and pharmacologic effect of DCLHb in this patient population. RESULTS: During the period from the end of cardiopulmonary bypass surgery through postoperative day 7 or hospital discharge, 20 of 104 (19%) DCLHb recipients did not receive a transfusion of pRBCs compared with 100% of control patients (P < 0.05). The overall number of pRBCs administered during the 7-day postoperative period was not significantly different. Mortality was similar between the DCLHb (6 of 104 patients) and the control (8 of 105 patients) groups. Hypertension, jaundice/hyperbilirubinemia, increased serum glutamic oxalo-acetic transaminase, abnormal urine, and hematuria were reported more frequently in the DCLHb group, and there was one case of renal failure in each group. The hemodynamic effects of DCLHb included a consistent and slightly greater increase in systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance with associated increases in systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures compared with pRBC. Cardiac output values decreased more in the DCLHb group patients after the first administration than the control group patients. At 24 h postinfusion, the plasma hemoglobin level was less than one half the maximal level for any amount of DCLHb infused. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of DCLHb allowed a significant number (19%) of cardiac surgery patients to avoid exposure to erythrocytes postoperatively.

Is there an evolution in the epidemiology and follow-up of carbon monoxide poisoning victims?

A retrospective study was conducted to investigate for potential changes in the epidemiology of acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning and to evaluate the recommendations within the emergency department (ED) on therapy and neurological and social follow-up of these patients. One hundred and sixty-seven patients with a non-intentional CO poisoning in the time period from 1995 to 1997 were reviewed and compared with data of a similar patient population between 1988 and 1990. Both patient groups were matched for age, sex and comorbidity. Comparing the epidemiological data of the two groups, three main evolutions were observed: (1) there is a global reduction in ED admissions for CO poisoning; (2) the number of young victims has a tendency to decrease; (3) the most common CO source has become an insufficiently functioning stove instead of a defective gas water heater. Regarding treatment and follow-up strategies three conclusions could be drawn: (1) the recommendations for hyperbaric-oxygen therapy were strictly followed; (2) the neurological follow-up was poor and has to be ameliorated and revisited; (3) the systematic follow-up by the social worker on the other hand resulted in immediate actions to prevent a second CO poisoning. This recently elaborated protocol for social evaluation emphasizes the important function of the social worker in the ED and the importance of transmural follow-up organized by the ED.