Can Flanders resist the measles outbreak? Assessing vaccination coverage in different age groups among Flemish residents.

The Belgian strategic plan to eliminate measles contains several vaccination strategies including routine immunisation programmes and catch-up campaigns. A new expanded programme on immunisation-based survey (2016) assessed the uptake of the recommended measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine in three different cohorts: toddlers, adolescents and parents of toddlers. A two-stage cluster sampling technique was used to select 875 toddlers (age 18-24 months) and 1250 adolescents (born in 2000) from 107 municipalities in Flanders. After consent of the parent(s), 746 (85.2%) families of toddlers and 1012 (81.0%) families of adolescents were interviewed at home. Measles vaccination coverage was high at 18-24 months (96.2%) and 81.5% were vaccinated at recommended age. Toddlers who had two siblings or a non-working mother or changed vaccinator were more at risk for not being vaccinated. Coverage of the teenager dose reached 93.5% and was lower in adolescents with educational underachievement or whose mother was part-time working or with a non-Belgian background. Only 56.0% of mothers and 48.3% of fathers remembered having received at least one measles-containing vaccine. Although measles vaccination coverage in toddlers meets the required standards for elimination, administration of the teenager dose of MMR vaccine and parent compliance to the recent measles catch-up campaign in Flanders leave room for improvement.

Safety profile of the 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine: assessment in prior quadrivalent HPV vaccine recipients and in men 16 to 26 years of age.

A 9-valent HPV (9vHPV) vaccine has been developed to protect against HPV type 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58-related infection and disease. Previous safety analyses from 7 clinical trials conducted in 9vHPV vaccine recipients 9-26 years of age, including comparisons of 9vHPV and quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) vaccines in girls and women 16-26 years of age, showed that the 9vHPV vaccine was generally well tolerated. Additional safety analyses were conducted to include the results of new clinical studies. The safety profile of the 9vHPV vaccine in prior qHPV vaccine recipients (n = 3756 from 1 randomized controlled trial and 2 open-label extension studies) and young men (n = 248 9vHPV and n = 248 qHPV vaccine recipients from 1 randomized controlled trial) was evaluated. Vaccine was administered as a 3-dose regimen (at Day 1 and Months 2 and 6), and adverse events (AEs) were monitored. The most common AEs were injection-site events (91.1% and 79.0% in prior qHPV vaccine recipients and young men, respectively), the majority of which were mild. Discontinuations due to an AE were rare (0.2% and 0.0% among prior qHPV vaccine recipients and young men, respectively). In young men, the AE profile of the 9vHPV vaccine was generally similar to that of the qHPV vaccine. Overall, the 9vHPV vaccine was generally well tolerated in prior qHPV vaccine recipients and in young men, with an AE profile generally consistent with that previously reported with the broader clinical program.

Immunogenicity and safety of a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine following a 4-week or a 12-month interval between two doses.

BACKGROUND: The MMRV combination vaccine, Priorix-Tetra™, is currently licensed in several European countries using a two-dose schedule in infants aged ≥9 months, with a preferred 6-week to 3-month interval between doses. This study was undertaken to generate safety and immunogenicity data for two doses of MMRV vaccine administered according to dose schedules using the shortest permitted interval of 4 weeks versus a longer interval of 12 months, which would allow flexible adaptation to local immunization calendars. METHODS: Healthy children aged 11-13 months were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 2 doses of either: MMRV vaccine with a 4-week interval between doses (MMRV-4W group, N=188), MMRV vaccine with a 12-month interval between doses (MMRV-12M group, N=184), or MMR vaccine with a 4-week interval between doses (MMR group, N=187). Blood samples were taken prior to, and 4-6 weeks after each vaccination. RESULTS: Post-Dose 2, both MMRV groups exhibited an adequate immunogenic response for all components; however the MMRV-12M group showed significantly greater geometric mean titers for mumps, rubella and varicella. Two varicella breakthrough cases occurred within the 12-month interval between doses in the MMRV-12M group. Local and general reactogenicity results were similar for all groups except for the MMRV-4W group, which had a greater incidence of fever during Days 0-14 post-Dose 1. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of MMRV vaccine administered in the second year of life elicited adequate immunogenicity and were well-tolerated whether administered with a dose interval of 4 weeks or 12 months.

Administration of hepatitis A vaccine at 6 and 12 months of age concomitantly with hexavalent (DTaP-IPV-PRP approximately T-HBs) combination vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Administration of two doses of hepatitis A (HA) vaccine to children > or = 2 years of age has been shown to be protective. The present study assessed whether HA vaccine can be administered as early as 6 months of age and whether it can be administered concomitantly with a hexavalent (HV) vaccine at this age. METHODS: In an open label, randomized, parallel group study, the liquid HV vaccine (HEXAVAC) (diphtheria, tetanus, 2-component acellular pertussis, inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugated to tetanus protein and hepatitis B) was administered at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months of age to all children. HA vaccine (VAQTA) was given at 7 and 13 months in the separate administration group (Group 1) and at 6 and 12 months in the concomitant administration group (Group 2). Serum samples were obtained at 2, 7, 12, and 14 months in Group 1 and at 2, 7, 12, and 13 months in Group 2. The primary immunogenicity outcomes were the seroconversion rates for HA 1 month after the second dose of HA vaccine in initially seronegative subjects, and the seroconversion rates for each HV antigen 1 month after the third dose of the HV vaccine (both at 7 months of age). RESULTS: HA seropositivity rates 1 month after the second dose were 100% in both groups, regardless of initial serostatus. The responses to each HV antigen 1 month after the third dose were similar in both groups. The vaccines were generally well tolerated in both groups regardless of vaccine(s) administered. CONCLUSIONS: A schedule of two doses of HA vaccine, 6 months apart beginning at 6 months of age is highly immunogenic and well tolerated when administered alone or concomitantly with HV vaccine at 6 and 12 months of age.

Effects of lowering the aluminium content of a dTpa vaccine on its immunogenicity and reactogenicity when given as a booster to adolescents.

As aluminium in vaccines has been associated with the incidence of local side effects occurring after vaccination, this observer-blind randomised clinical trial was designed to evaluate the effect of lowering the aluminium content of a combined reduced-antigen-content dTpa vaccine on immunogenicity and safety when administered to healthy adolescents aged 10-18 years. A total of 647 subjects were enrolled, 224 (35%) received a dTpa formulation with 0.5 mg aluminium, 209 (32%) a formulation with 0.3 mg aluminium and 214 (33%) a formulation with 0.133 mg aluminium. One month after boostering, all subjects were seroprotected against diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. All subjects were seropositive for anti-FHA and anti-PRN but 4% of the initially seronegatives in both reduced aluminium groups did not seroconvert for anti-PT. Booster responses did not differ significantly between groups for any antibody, but post booster vaccination anti-PT GMC's differed significantly between groups and decreased when vaccine aluminium content decreased. No clear difference between study groups in local or general side effects was demonstrated. The most frequently reported symptoms after vaccination were injection site pain (89.5-90.7%), fatigue (42.1-47.4%) and headache (41.1-45.1%). This study showed that the aluminium content has a specific influence on the immunogenicity of this dTpa vaccine.

The value of CAGE, CUGE, and AUDIT in screening for alcohol abuse and dependence among college freshmen.

BACKGROUND: This study attempted to (1) determine the prevalence of alcohol problems in college freshmen, (2) assess the performance of both the CAGE and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaires in this population, and (3) assess the possibility of improving the CAGE and/or AUDIT. METHODS: A sample of 3564 consecutive college freshmen, with a mean age of 18 years, at the Catholic University of Leuven, (Belgium) completed, during a cross-sectional study, a questionnaire assessing drinking behavior and identifying students at risk as defined by DSM-IV criteria. The questionnaire also included the CAGE questionnaire and the AUDIT. Calculations of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves for different scores of the CAGE and the AUDIT were performed, using DSM-IV criteria as the reference standard. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the CAGE and the AUDIT was 0.76 and 0.85, respectively. The cutoff score of 1 for the CAGE was associated with a sensitivity of 42%, a specificity of 87%, a positive predictive value of 36%, and a negative predictive value of 90%. A score of 6 or more for the AUDIT gave a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 78%, a positive predictive value of 37%, and a negative predictive value of 77%. These results were related with a prevalence of 14.1% of alcohol problems. Replacing one question of the CAGE by "often driving under the influence" resulted in the CUGE (acronym for "cut down, under influence, guilty feelings, and eye opener"), with an area under the curve of 0.96, a positive likelihood ratio of 8.7, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of alcohol problems in college students is confirmed to be high. When screening for alcohol problems in a college freshmen population, one question seems extremely important. The newly constructed CUGE questionnaire may improve screening efforts in students, compared with existing questionnaires.

The effect of reconstitution of an Haemophilus influenzae type b-tentanus toxoid conjugate (PRP-T) vaccine on the immune responses to a diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine: a five-year follow-up.

Controversial results have been obtained from previous studies on the combined administration of Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid conjugate (PRP-T) and diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis (DTwP) combination vaccines, with regard to possible reciprocal interference between the constituent antigens. To document the priming effect and possible long-term immunogenic interference of PRP-T and DTwP combination vaccines, a randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted in Belgium. A total of 168 healthy infants received, at 3, 4 and 5 months of age, DTwP vaccine mixed just prior to injection either with PRP-T vaccine (group A, DTwP//PRP-T, N = 85) or with placebo (group B, DTwP//Placebo, N = 83). At the age of 14 months, children of both groups were randomized to receive either a dose of DTwP//PRP-T vaccine (subgroups A1 and B1) or a dose of Hib polysaccharide (PRP) vaccine (subgroups A2 and B2). Those children in subgroups A1 and B1 had an additional serum sample taken at the age of 5 years (at the time of a DT booster). The immune response to Hib polysaccharide at the age of 4, 5 and 6 months confirmed the excellent immunogenicity profile of PRP-T in infants. In addition, the vigorous anamnestic response (i.e. a 20-fold increase of GMT) to a booster dose of the plain capsular polysaccharide (PRP) reflected the efficient Hib-priming induced by the combined DTwP//PRP-T vaccine. Reconstitution of PRP-T with DTwP did not affect the immune response to diphtheria toxoid or pertussis agglutinins. Nevertheless, at almost any time point during the five-year follow-up, the tetanus antitoxin GMT values were significantly lower in the DTwP//PRP-T group (A and A1) than in the DTwP//Placebo group (B and B1). Despite the suppressive effect on GMT values, intergroup differences in rates of seroprotection were never significant, except after doses 2 and 3 for which there were lower percentages of children in group A with antitoxin titers > 0.05 IU/mL and > 1.0 IU/mL. In the group primed with the combined DTwP//PRP-T vaccine, (1) a DT booster dose at the age of 5 years provoked a 150-fold increase in tetanus antitoxin GMT, (2) a high tetanus antitoxin GMT value was attained (GMT = 19.3 IU/mL) and (3) all children in this group had tetanus antitoxin titers > 1.0 IU/mL, so it may be concluded that all these children will still be protected against tetanus until at least the age of the next recommended booster dose (i.e. the age of 15 years). No differences in the occurrence of adverse events were observed between the groups who received the DTwP//PRP-T vaccine or the DTwP//Placebo vaccine, both vaccines being associated with events customarily attributable to DTwP (data not shown). Our results indicate (1) that the combination vaccine, DTwP//PRP-T, represents a safe and effective alternative for the existing uncombined vaccines and (2) that the long-term effect of interference between the components of future combination vaccines should be studied with subsequent booster doses, followed by the evaluation of persistence of antibodies over several years.

Priming effect, immunogenicity and safety of an Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid conjugate (PRP-T) and diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) combination vaccine administered to infants in Belgium and Turkey.

To evaluate the priming effect, immunogenicity and safety of an Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) tetanus toxoid conjugate (PRP-T) and diphtheria-tetanus-acellular (two component) pertussis (DTaP) combination vaccine, a randomized, comparative study was conducted in two centers, one in Belgium and one in Turkey. A total of 410 healthy infants, 160 in Belgium and 250 in Turkey, randomly received DTaP and PRP-T vaccines in one of three fashions. One group (N = 138) received DTaP and PRP-T vaccines reconstituted immediately prior to injection at 3, 4 and 5 months of age, and are referred to as the combined, short schedule group (Co-S). A second group (N = 135) received DTaP + PRP-T simultaneously but injected at different sites according to the same schedule, and are referred to as the associated, short schedule group (As-S). The third group (N = 137) also received DTaP + PRP-T at separate sites, but at 2, 4 and 6 months, and are referred to as the associated, long schedule group (As-L). The As-L group allowed for serological bridging with a Senegalese two-component pertussis vaccine efficacy trial, using the same batch of DTaP vaccine. Children of both short-schedule groups (Co-S and As-S) received, at the age of 12-14 months, a booster dose of DTaP vaccine associated with unconjugated PRP vaccine. Mixing of the vaccines did not affect the immune response to the antigens included in the DTaP vaccine. The immune response to Hib capsular polysaccharide, however, was significantly lower after combined administration (Co-S group) than after associated (As-S group) administration (P < 0.0001), with a similar trend among both countries (GMTs, 1.78 microg/ml and 6.19 microg/ml in Belgium, and 5.02 microg/ml and 11.67 microg/ml in Turkey). Booster vaccination with the unconjugated PRP induced a vigorous and similar anamnestic response in both groups. Belgian infants showed a significantly lower immune response to all antigens than Turkish infants (P < or = 0.001 for all antigens), with a similar trend among each study group. In all groups, the incidence of adverse events was lower than that usually reported after DTwP(whole-cell) vaccine. Higher rates of systemic reactions were observed in the Belgian population, possibly due to differences in reporting practice. Our results indicate (1) that the combination vaccine, DTaP//PRP-T, represents an important improvement over the existing uncombined vaccines; (2) that immunogenicity studies should include at least one booster injection to evaluate priming effects by combined vaccines; and (3) that it is feasible and valuable to co-randomize combination vaccine studies in sufficiently different geographical areas and child populations.

[Prevalence of alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence according to DSM-IV criteria in first year university students]. / De prevalentie van overmatig alcoholgebruik en alcoholafhankelijkheid volgens DSM-IV-criteria bij eerstejaarsstudenten.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of alcohol problems in first-year college students. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHOD: Data on the prevalence of alcohol abuse or dependence according to DSM-IV criteria were collected in the period November 1995-April 1996 among college freshmen at the Catholic University of Louvain (Belgium). 3564 consecutive students completed a questionnaire which assessed drinking behaviour (Composite International Diagnostic Interview CIDI, Section J) and identified students at risk as defined by DSM-IV criteria. Our study included a large number of college freshmen, so we were able to perform our analyses with a large statistical power. All students had the opportunity to refuse their co-operation, but there were no non-responders, so selection bias was absent. The medical ethical committee of the KU Leuven approved this study. RESULTS: Of all 3564 consecutive students 501 (14.1%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 12.9-15.3) met DSM-IV criteria of alcohol abuse (n = 373; 10.5%; 9.5-11.5) or of alcohol dependence (n = 128; 3.6%; 3.0-4.2). Of the male students 301 (18.5%; 16.7-20.5) met the criteria of alcohol abuse and 96 (5.9%; 4.8-7.1) of alcohol dependence, of the female students 72 (3.7%; 2.9-4.6) and 32 (1.6%; 1.2-2.3) respectively. More than 10% (12.2%; 11.1-13.3) of these freshmen operated a vehicle under influence. This contributed in a major way to the DSM-IV conclusion. CONCLUSION: In this, one of the first studies among college freshmen using DSM-IV criteria the prevalence of alcohol abuse was in excess of 10%. In addition a substantial proportion of college freshman appeared to be alcohol dependent according to DSM-IV criteria.