Febrile neutropenia and Fusobacterium bacteremia: clinical experience with 13 cases.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the disease spectrum of Fusobacterium bacteremia in our neutropenic patients and review the literature. METHODS: This was a 6.5-year retrospective study in which all the records of neutropenic patients with Fusobacterium bacteremia were analyzed. RESULTS: Fusobacterium bacteremia was found in 13 neutropenic patients, 10 with hematological malignancies and 3 with solid tumors. The standard clinical presentation was that of primary bacteremia with benign evolution under antibiotics with anaerobic coverage. Most patients presented with oral mucositis as the probable portal of entry. Coinfection with other germs was documented in four patients. No patient had a localized infection documented. Most patients were receiving ciprofloxacin chemoprophylaxis. None of the patients had catheter-related infection. All tested strains were susceptible to all standard anaerobic agents. Fusobacterium spp. were responsible for 5% of bacteremias in neutropenic patients in our hospital during the last 6.5 years. CONCLUSION: Fusobacterium bacteremia is a possible cause of febrile neutropenia, especially in the setting of quinolone prophylaxis and oral mucositis after intense chemotherapeutic regimens. We think that its benign outcome if there is no localized infection detected does not justify the use of antianaerobic prophylaxis. Combination of beta-lactams and beta-lactamase inhibitors is a safe and reasonable treatment.

Ceftazidime combined with mecillinam: serum bactericidal titres compared with in-vitro synergy against gram-negative bacilli.

In a study of the possible interaction between mecillinam and ceftazidime against Gram-negative bacilli, ten volunteers received on separate days: ceftazidime 20 mg/kg iv in 15 min, mecillinam 10 mg/kg iv in 15 min, or the combination. Blood samples were obtained before and 1 and 6 h after the end of the infusion. Ten strains each of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Citrobacter freundii, Salmonella spp. and Yersinia spp. and nine strains each of Acinetobacter spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were selected. Most of the strains were resistant to ampicillin and cefazolin. Serum levels of ceftazidime and mecillinam were measured by bioassay. Serum bacteriostatic (SBS) and bactericidal (SBA) titration was done in microtitre plates in cation supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth and 50% human serum. Chequerboard titration was also studied to assess in-vitro synergy between ceftazidime and mecillinam in Mueller-Hinton broth with or without 50% serum. The mean serum concentrations (SD) were for mecillinam: 6.1 (1.7) at 1 h, and less than 0.3 at 6 h and for ceftazidime: 36.3 (5.5) at 1 h and less than 5 at 6 h. Identical concentrations were measured for the combination. By chequerboard titration, no synergy occurred for Acinetobacter spp. and Ps. aeruginosa, whereas it was observed in 37/60 (FIC) and 33/60 (FBC) of the strains of other species in Mueller-Hinton; from the strains showing synergy, 28/37 (FIC) and 30/33 (FBC) showed also synergy in Mueller-Hinton with 50% human serum. In SBS and SBA, on the other hand, the combination of mecillinam with ceftazidime showed an additive effect against most Enterobacteriaceae tested, synergy being shown for only 10-35% of tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative in vitro activity of CI934, a new fluoroquinolone, alone and in combination with coumermycin, against gram-positive bacteria.

The in vitro activity of Cl934, a new quinolone antimicrobial agent, was studied against 314 strains of Gram-positive bacteria representing 6 genera: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus faecalis, S. agalactiae, S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, S. milleri, viridans streptococci, Listeria monocytogenes, Corynebacterium JK, Mycobacterium fortuitum and Bacillus spp.; and compared with that of enoxacin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin G, ampicillin, coumermycin, oxacillin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, rifampin, rifapentine, LM 427, erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline and clindamycin. The agar dilution method was used. Cl934 was very active in vitro, with MIC90 less than or equal to 0.5 mg/l against most species tested, except for S. faecalis and M. fortuitum. It was usually 2 to 8-fold more active than ciprofloxacin. Cl934 was also tested by the killing curve method, alone and in combination with coumermycin. It was rapidly bactericidal against most species tested, including S. faecalis. A synergistic interaction was observed with coumermycin against S. aureus, S. agalactiae, S. milleri and S. faecalis. The only antagonistic interaction occurred against L. monocytogenes exposed to 8 X MIC of Cl934 with 2 X MIC of coumermycin.