Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Vaccine ; 38(18): 3411-3421, 2020 04 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32192811

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To optimize vaccine implementation visits for young children, it could be efficient to administer the first RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine dose during the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) visit at 6 months of age together with Vitamin A supplementation and the third RTS,S/AS01 dose on the same day as yellow fever (YF), measles and rubella vaccines at 9 months of age. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of RTS,S/AS01 when co-administered with YF and combined measles-rubella (MR) vaccines. METHODS: In this phase 3b, open-label, controlled study (NCT02699099), 709 Ghanaian children were randomized (1:1:1) to receive RTS,S/AS01 at 6, 7.5 and 9 months of age, and YF and MR vaccines at 9 or 10.5 months of age (RTS,S coad and RTS,S alone groups, respectively). The third group received YF and MR vaccines at 9 months of age and will receive RTS,S/AS01 at 10.5, 11.5 and 12.5 months of age (Control group). All children received Vitamin A at 6 months of age. Non-inferiority of immune responses to the vaccine antigens was evaluated 1 month following co-administration versus RTS,S/AS01 or EPI vaccines (YF and MR vaccines) alone using pre-defined non-inferiority criteria. Safety was assessed until Study month 4.5. RESULTS: Non-inferiority of antibody responses to the anti-circumsporozoite and anti-hepatitis B virus surface antigens when RTS,S/AS01 was co-administered with YF and MR vaccines versus RTS,S/AS01 alone was demonstrated. Non-inferiority of antibody responses to the measles, rubella, and YF antigens when RTS,S/AS01 was co-administered with YF and MR vaccines versus YF and MR vaccines alone was demonstrated. The safety profile of all vaccines was clinically acceptable in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: RTS,S/AS01 can be co-administered with Vitamin A at 6 months and with YF and MR vaccines at 9 months of age during EPI visits, without immune response impairment to any vaccine antigen or negative safety effect.


Subject(s)
Malaria Vaccines , Measles , Rubella , Yellow Fever Vaccine , Child , Child, Preschool , Ghana , Humans , Infant , Malaria Vaccines/adverse effects , Rubella/prevention & control , Yellow Fever Vaccine/adverse effects
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 16(6): 1464-1470, 2020 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31951771

ABSTRACT

RTS,S/AS01E malaria vaccine contains the hepatitis B virus surface antigen and may thus serve as a potential hepatitis B vaccine. To evaluate the impact of RTS,S/AS01E when implemented in the Expanded Program of Immunization, infants 8-12 weeks old were randomized to receive either RTS,S/AS01E or a licensed hepatitis B control vaccine (HepB), both co-administered with various combinations of the following childhood vaccines: diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b, trivalent oral poliovirus, pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate and human rotavirus vaccine. Long-term persistence of antibodies against the circumsporozoite (CS) protein and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were assessed, together with the immune memory response to the HB antigen following a booster dose of HepB vaccine. Subgroups receiving RTS,S or the HepB control vaccine were pooled into RTS,S groups and HepB groups, respectively. One month post-HepB booster vaccination, 100% of participants in the RTS,S groups and 98.3% in the control groups had anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/mL with the geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) at 46634.7 mIU/mL (95% CI: 40561.3; 53617.6) and 9258.2 mIU/mL (95% CI: 6925.3; 12377.0), respectively. Forty-eight months post-primary vaccination anti-CS antibody GMCs ranged from 2.3 EU/mL to 2.7 EU/mL in the RTS,S groups compared to 1.1 EU/mL in the control groups. Hepatitis B priming with the RTS,S/AS01E vaccine was effective and resulted in a memory response to HBsAg as shown by the robust booster response following an additional dose of HepB vaccine. RTS,S/AS01E when co-administered with PHiD-CV, HRV and other childhood vaccines, had an acceptable safety profile.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines , Haemophilus Vaccines , Hepatitis B , Malaria Vaccines , Child , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine , Hepatitis B Vaccines , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Immunologic Memory , Infant , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated , Vaccines, Combined
3.
Vaccine ; 38(4): 897-906, 2020 01 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31708182

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in a subset of children identified as HIV-infected during a large phase III randomized controlled trial conducted in seven sub-Saharan African countries. METHODS: Infants 6-12 weeks and children 5-17 months old were randomized to receive 4 RTS,S/AS01 doses (R3R group), 3 RTS,S/AS01 doses plus 1 comparator vaccine dose (R3C group), or 4 comparator vaccine doses (C3C group) at study months 0, 1, 2 and 20. Infants and children with WHO stage III/IV HIV disease were excluded but HIV testing was not routinely performed on all participants; our analyses included children identified as HIV-infected based on medical history or clinical suspicion and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction or antibody testing. Serious adverse events (SAEs) and anti-circumsporozoite (CS) antibodies were assessed. RESULTS: Of 15459 children enrolled in the trial, at least 1953 were tested for HIV and 153 were confirmed as HIV-infected (R3R: 51; R3C: 54; C3C: 48). Among these children, SAEs were reported for 92.2% (95% CI: 81.1-97.8) in the R3R, 85.2% (72.9-93.4) in the R3C and 87.5% (74.8-95.3) in the C3C group over a median follow-up of 39.3, 39.4 and 38.3 months, respectively. Fifteen HIV-infected participants in each group (R3R: 29.4%, R3C: 27.8%, C3C: 31.3%) died during the study. No deaths were considered vaccination-related. In a matched case-control analysis, 1 month post dose 3 anti-CS geometric mean antibody concentrations were 193.3 EU/mL in RTS,S/AS01-vaccinated HIV-infected children and 491.5 EU/mL in RTS,S/AS01-vaccinated immunogenicity controls with unknown or negative HIV status (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of RTS,S/AS01 in HIV-infected children was comparable to that of the comparator (meningococcal or rabies) vaccines. RTS,S/AS01 was immunogenic in HIV-infected children but antibody concentrations were lower than in children with an unknown or negative HIV status. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00866619.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Malaria Vaccines/administration & dosage , Malaria, Falciparum/prevention & control , Vaccination , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Africa South of the Sahara , Case-Control Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Infant , Malaria Vaccines/adverse effects , Malaria Vaccines/immunology , Male , Vaccines, Synthetic/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(10): 2386-2398, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31012786

ABSTRACT

A phase III, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial (NCT00866619) in sub-Saharan Africa showed RTS,S/AS01 vaccine efficacy against malaria. We now present in-depth safety results from this study. 8922 children (enrolled at 5-17 months) and 6537 infants (enrolled at 6-12 weeks) were 1:1:1-randomized to receive 4 doses of RTS,S/AS01 (R3R) or non-malaria control vaccine (C3C), or 3 RTS,S/AS01 doses plus control (R3C). Aggregate safety data were reviewed by a multi-functional team. Severe malaria with Blantyre Coma Score ≤2 (cerebral malaria [CM]) and gender-specific mortality were assessed post-hoc. Serious adverse event (SAE) and fatal SAE incidences throughout the study were 24.2%-28.4% and 1.5%-2.5%, respectively across groups; 0.0%-0.3% of participants reported vaccination-related SAEs. The incidence of febrile convulsions in children was higher during the first 2-3 days post-vaccination with RTS,S/AS01 than with control vaccine, consistent with the time window of post-vaccination febrile reactions in this study (mostly the day after vaccination). A statistically significant numerical imbalance was observed for meningitis cases in children (R3R: 11, R3C: 10, C3C: 1) but not in infants. CM cases were more frequent in RTS,S/AS01-vaccinated children (R3R: 19, R3C: 24, C3C: 10) but not in infants. All-cause mortality was higher in RTS,S/AS01-vaccinated versus control girls (2.4% vs 1.3%, all ages) in our setting with low overall mortality. The observed meningitis and CM signals are considered likely chance findings, that - given their severity - warrant further evaluation in phase IV studies and WHO-led pilot implementation programs to establish the RTS,S/AS01 benefit-risk profile in real-life settings.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Malaria Vaccines/adverse effects , Malaria, Falciparum/prevention & control , Africa South of the Sahara , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fever/chemically induced , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Malaria Vaccines/immunology , Malaria, Cerebral/mortality , Malaria, Cerebral/prevention & control , Malaria, Falciparum/mortality , Male , Meningitis/chemically induced , Plasmodium falciparum , Seizures, Febrile/chemically induced , Vaccination
5.
Pan Afr Med J ; 30: 142, 2018.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30374388

ABSTRACT

RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine received a favorable scientific opinion from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in July 2015. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the pilot introduction of this vaccine in children aged 5 months or older using a vaccination schedule which included 3 initial doses separated by at least 1 month and a 4th dose administered 15-18 months after the 3rd dose. Clinical trials and mathematical models showed that the partial protection against malaria conferred by vaccine RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine could have a substantial impact on public health if the vaccine was used in association with other control measures for malaria, in particular in highly endemic areas. The most significant impact was observed in children aged 5 months or older who received 4 doses of RTS,S/AS01. Vaccine effectiveness will then be evaluated under real-life conditions in order to determine its impact on mortality, its safety in the context of routine immunization and the feasibility of implementing the 4-dose vaccination schedule requiring new immunization contacts. If successful, this would pave the way for larger-scale implementation.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Malaria Vaccines/administration & dosage , Malaria/prevention & control , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Age Factors , Humans , Infant , Public Health , Vaccination
6.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 14(6): 1489-1500, 2018 06 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29630438

ABSTRACT

The RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine (Mosquirix) reduces the incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and is intended for routine administration to infants in Sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV; Synflorix) and human rotavirus vaccine (HRV; Rotarix) when co-administered with RTS,S/AS01 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01345240) in African infants. 705 healthy infants aged 8-12 weeks were randomized to receive three doses of either RTS,S/AS01 or licensed hepatitis B (HBV; Engerix B) vaccine (control) co-administered with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type-b-conjugate vaccine (DTaP/Hib) and trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine at 8-12-16 weeks of age, because DTaP/Hib was not indicated before 8 weeks of age. The vaccination schedule can still be considered broadly applicable because it was within the age range recommended for EPI vaccination. PHiD-CV or HRV were either administered together with the study vaccines, or after a 2-week interval. Booster doses of PHiD-CV and DTaP/Hib were administered at age 18 months. Non-inferiority of anti-HBV surface antigen antibody seroprotection rates following co-administration with RTS,S/AS01 was demonstrated compared to the control group (primary objective). Pre-specified non-inferiority criteria were reached for PHiD-CV (for 9/10 vaccine serotypes), HRV, and aP antigens co-administered with RTS,S/AS01 as compared to HBV co-administration (secondary objectives). RTS,S/AS01 induced a response to circumsporozoite protein in all groups. Pain and low grade fever were reported more frequently in the PHiD-CV group co-administered with RTS,S/AS01 than PHiD-CV co-administered with HBV. No serious adverse events were considered to be vaccine-related. RTS,S/AS01 co-administered with pediatric vaccines had an acceptable safety profile. Immune responses to RTS,S/AS01 and to co-administered PHiD-CV, pertussis antigens and HRV were satisfactory.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Immunization Schedule , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Malaria Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Africa South of the Sahara , Female , Fever/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Malaria Vaccines/adverse effects , Malaria Vaccines/immunology , Male , Pain/epidemiology , Pneumococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology
7.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 15(12): 1481-1493, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27841689

ABSTRACT

The RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine received a positive scientific opinion from the European Medicines Agency in July 2015. The World Health Organization recommended pilot implementation of the vaccine in children at least 5 months of age according to an initial 3-dose schedule given at least 1 month apart, and a 4th dose 15-18 months post-dose 3. Clinical trials and mathematical modeling demonstrated that the partial protection provided by RTS,S/AS01 against malaria has the potential to provide substantial public health benefit when used in parallel with other malaria interventions, especially in highly endemic regions. The highest impact was seen with 4 vaccine doses in children aged 5 months or older. The vaccine will be evaluated in real-life settings to further assess its impact on mortality, vaccine safety in the context of routine immunization, and programmatic feasibility of delivering a 4-dose vaccination schedule requiring new immunization contacts. If successful, this will pave the way for larger-scale implementation.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Malaria Vaccines/administration & dosage , Malaria Vaccines/immunology , Malaria/prevention & control , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Humans , Infant , Malaria Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...