Behavioral metabolomics analysis identifies novel neurochemical signatures in methamphetamine sensitization.

Behavioral sensitization has been widely studied in animal models and is theorized to reflect neural modifications associated with human psychostimulant addiction. While the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway is known to play a role, the neurochemical mechanisms underlying behavioral sensitization remain incompletely understood. In this study, we conducted the first metabolomics analysis to globally characterize neurochemical differences associated with behavioral sensitization. Methamphetamine (MA)-induced sensitization measures were generated by statistically modeling longitudinal activity data for eight inbred strains of mice. Subsequent to behavioral testing, nontargeted liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry profiling was performed on 48 brain samples, yielding 301 metabolite levels per sample after quality control. Association testing between metabolite levels and three primary dimensions of behavioral sensitization (total distance, stereotypy and margin time) showed four robust, significant associations at a stringent metabolome-wide significance threshold (false discovery rate, FDR <0.05). Results implicated homocarnosine, a dipeptide of GABA and histidine, in total distance sensitization, GABA metabolite 4-guanidinobutanoate and pantothenate in stereotypy sensitization, and myo-inositol in margin time sensitization. Secondary analyses indicated that these associations were independent of concurrent MA levels and, with the exception of the myo-inositol association, suggest a mechanism whereby strain-based genetic variation produces specific baseline neurochemical differences that substantially influence the magnitude of MA-induced sensitization. These findings demonstrate the utility of mouse metabolomics for identifying novel biomarkers, and developing more comprehensive neurochemical models, of psychostimulant sensitization.

Effects of the specific α4ß2 nAChR antagonist, 2-fluoro-3-(4-nitrophenyl) deschloroepibatidine, on nicotine reward-related behaviors in rats and mice.

RATIONALE: Alleviating addiction to tobacco products could prevent millions of deaths. Investigating novel compounds selectively targeting α4ß2 nAChRs hypothesized to have a key role in the rewarding effects of nicotine may be a useful approach for future treatment. OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to evaluate 2-fluoro-3-(4-nitrophenyl) deschloroepibatidine (4-nitro-PFEB), a potent competitive antagonist of neuronal α4ß2 nAChRs, in several animal models related to nicotine reward: drug discrimination, intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS), conditioned place preference, and limited access to self-administration. METHODS: Long Evans rats were trained in a two-lever discrimination procedure to discriminate 0.4 mg/kg nicotine (s.c.) from saline. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were stereotaxically implanted with electrodes and trained to respond for direct electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle. ICR mice were evaluated using an unbiased place preference paradigm, and finally, male Wistar rats were implanted with intrajugular catheters and tested for nicotine self-administration under limited access (1 h/day). RESULTS: 4-Nitro-PFEB attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine, but alone did not produce nicotine-like discriminative stimulus effects. Nicotine-induced facilitation of ICSS reward thresholds was reversed by 4-nitro-PFEB, which alone had no effect on thresholds. 4-Nitro-PFEB also blocked the conditioned place preference produced by nicotine, but alone had no effect on conditioned place preference. Finally, 4-nitro-PFEB dose-dependently decreased nicotine self-administration. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that neuronal α4ß2 nAChRs play a key role in mediating the rewarding effects of nicotine and further suggest that targeting α4ß2 nAChRs may yield a potential candidate for the treatment of nicotine dependence.

Enhancement of the behavioral effects of endogenous and exogenous cannabinoid agonists by phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride.

Marijuana's effects in humans are most often reported as intoxicating or therapeutic; yet, some humans report dysphoria or other negative affect. To evaluate whether differences in endocannabinoid levels might account for this variability, the present study examined whether sensitivity to cannabinoids changed when anandamide (AEA) metabolism was inhibited through administration of phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) a non-specific irreversible amidase inhibitor. Male Long Evans rats were trained to discriminate 3 mg/kg Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) versus vehicle in 2-lever drug discrimination procedure. ED(50)s for THC and CP 55,940 were lower when administered with PMSF than alone. PMSF administration also potentiated characteristic cannabimimetic effects of THC in ICR mice. Potentiation of AEA's in vivo effects by PMSF were also observed, primarily as a consequence of PMSF inhibition of the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase. Enhancement of the effects of THC and CP 55,940 through this mechanism is unlikely, as these cannabinoids are predominantly metabolized through the P450 system. Mass spectrometry revealed that, in the presence of THC, endogenous AEA levels in the brain decreased and that this decrease was prevented by PMSF, suggesting that increased AEA levels may have acted additively with exogenously administered cannabinoids to increase cannabimimetic effects. These findings may account for the varying affect in response to marijuana in humans or cannabinoids in animals while also suggesting that metabolic inhibitors of AEA may potentiate marijuana's intoxicating effects in humans. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder'.

Role of alpha5 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in pharmacological and behavioral effects of nicotine in mice.

Incorporation of the alpha5 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunit can greatly influence nAChR function without altering receptor number. Although few animal studies have assessed the role of the alpha5 nAChR in nicotine-mediated behaviors, recent evidence suggests an association between polymorphisms in the alpha5 nAChR gene and nicotine dependence phenotypes in humans. Thus, additional studies are imperative to elucidate the role and function of the alpha5 nAChR subunit in nicotine dependence. Using alpha5(-/-) mice, the current study aimed to examine the role of alpha5 nAChRs in the initial pharmacological effects of nicotine, nicotine reward using the conditioned place preference model, and the discriminative effects of nicotine using a two-lever drug discrimination model. (86)Rb(+) efflux and (125)I-epibatidine binding assays were conducted to examine the effect of alpha5 nAChR subunit deletion on expression and activity of functional nAChRs. Results show that alpha5(-/-) mice are less sensitive to the initial effects of nicotine in antinociception, locomotor activity, and hypothermia measures and that the alpha5 nAChR is involved in nicotine reward. Alternatively, alpha5(-/-) mice did not differ from wild-type littermates in sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine. Furthermore, deletion of the alpha5 nAChR subunit resulted in a statistically significant decrease in function in the thalamus and hindbrain, but the decreases noted in spinal cord were not statistically significant. Receptor number was unaltered in all areas tested. Taken together, results of the study suggest that alpha5 nAChRs are involved in nicotine-mediated behaviors relevant to development of nicotine dependence.

Effects of antipsychotic drugs on operant responding after acute and repeated administration.

RATIONALE: The current generation of atypical antipsychotic drugs represents an improvement over traditional ("typical") antipsychotics in many respects. However, a theoretical framework and adequate preclinical models have not yet been developed to predict or explain differences among the atypical antipsychotics, a necessary component of future development. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present set of experiments was to identify differences between the acute and subchronic effects of several atypical antipsychotic drugs and the typical antipsychotic haloperidol on operant responding in rats. METHODS: The effects of haloperidol and the atypical antipsychotics clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole, quetiapine, remoxipride, and thioridazine were determined in rats trained to respond for food reward under a multiple fixed ratio 30/fixed interval 60 s schedule. A profile of the acute effects of each drug on response rates, response durations, and within-session effects were determined. Next, the dose of each drug that produced 75% suppression of response rates was administered for 16 consecutive days to determine whether or not tolerance would develop to the rate-suppressing effects of that dose. RESULTS: All drugs produced dose-related decreases in response rates. Only haloperidol and risperidone produced significant increases in response duration, while only haloperidol and remoxipride displayed within-session response decrements. Tolerance was evident for clozapine and to a lesser extent thioridazine. CONCLUSIONS: These results illustrate that the current generation of atypical antipsychotics are a heterogeneous group and that operant procedures may be useful for identifying differences preclinically. Specifically, clozapine appears to possess properties that distinguish it from other atypical antipsychotics, particularly after repeated dosing.

Clozapine discrimination with a low training dose distinguishes atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs in rats.

RATIONALE: Previous drug discrimination studies with clozapine have not reliably distinguished between atypical and typical antipsychotics. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to determine whether low-dose clozapine drug discrimination could distinguish atypical from typical antipsychotics. METHODS: Rats were trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg clozapine from vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure. RESULTS: Generalization testing revealed full substitution with the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine (90.3% maximum generalization), sertindole (99.8%), and risperidone (87.1%) and partial substitution for quetiapine (seroquel, 66.4%) and the typical antipsychotics haloperidol (56.8%) and thioridazine (74.3%). Remoxipride (23.1%) and the typical antipsychotics chlorpromazine (27.9%) and fluphenazine (29.5%) did not reliably substitute for clozapine. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous clozapine drug discrimination studies with higher training doses, the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine, sertindole, and risperidone reliably substituted for clozapine while typical antipsychotics did not. These results suggest that low-dose clozapine drug discrimination may be a more sensitive assay for distinguishing atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs.

The discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine in rats.

RATIONALE: Analysis of the preclinical behavioral effects of atypical antipsychotic agents will provide a better understanding of how they differ from typical antipsychotics and aid in the development of future atypical antipsychotic drugs. OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to provide information about the discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine. METHODS: Rats were trained to discriminate the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine (either 0.5 mg/kg OLZ or 0.25 mg/kg OLZ, i.p.) from vehicle in a twolever drug discrimination procedure. The atypical antipsychotic clozapine fully substituted for olanzapine in both the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (99.3% drug lever responding [DLR]) and the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ group (99.9% DLR). The typical antipsychotic chlorpromazine also substituted for olanzapine in both the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (87.5% DLR) and in the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ group (98.9% DLR); whereas, haloperidol displayed partial substitution for olanzapine in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (56.1% DLR) and in the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ group (76.4% DLR). The 5.0-mg/kg dose of thioridazine produced olanzapine-appropriate responding in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (99.6% DLR), but only partial substitution was seen with the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ training dose (64.0% DLR). The atypical antipsychotics raclopride (53.9% DLR) and risperidone (60.1% DLR) displayed only partial substitution in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group. Both the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist scopolamine (90.0% DLR) and the 5-HT2A/2C serotonergic antagonist ritanserin (86.0% DLR) fully substituted for olanzapine in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous discrimination studies with clozapine-trained rats, the typical antipsychotic agents chlorpromazine and thioridazine and the serotonin antagonist ritanserin substituted for olanzapine. These results demonstrate that there are differences in the mechanisms underlying the discriminative stimulus properties of clozapine and olanzapine. Specifically, olanzapine's discriminative stimulus properties appear to be meditated in part by both cholinergic and serotonergic mechanisms.