Comprehensive Complication Index to Monitor Morbidity and Mortality After Liver Transplantation in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the short-term and long-term morbidity after liver transplantation (LTx) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). BACKGROUND: PSC is a common indication for LTx in Scandinavia. Recently, research has focused on long-term survival and morbidity. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) precisely describes postsurgical complications, by considering both number and severity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two patient groups were compared: those with classical PSC symptoms (n=148) and those with increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma (n=51, premalignant group). Two CCI scores were calculated, at 1-year post-LTx and a cumulative overall score at the latest follow-up. In addition, we investigated factors potentially related to high CCI. RESULTS: The 1-year median CCI were 29.6 and 26.2 in the classical and premalignant groups, respectively ( P =0.308). The median overall CCI were 43.2 and 46.8 ( P =0.765), respectively. Patient survival was significantly lower in patients with 1-year CCI>42. The most common complications associated with low survival were cholangitis, infections, and hypertension. One-year and overall CCI were similar between sexes and different types of biliary anastomosis. Patients with pre-LTx Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores >20 had higher 1-year and overall CCI (36.2 and 52.6, respectively) than those with lower Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores. Both low (<22) and high (>25 kg/m 2 ) body mass indices were associated with high overall 1-year and overall CCI (50.9 and 41.8, respectively), but median body mass indices were associated with significantly lower 1-year and overall CCI (38.4, P =0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The previously determined 1-year CCI cutoff of 42 could significantly predict survival post-LTx. Mortality and morbidity were not significantly different between the PSC groups analyzed.

Value of posttransplant protocol biopsies in 2 biliary autoimmune liver diseases: A step toward personalized immunosuppressive treatment.

ABSTRACT: The value of protocol liver graft biopsies with good liver function was evaluated in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) or primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).A total of 250 protocol liver biopsy reports from 182 PSC and PBC patients were compared. Overall histopathological findings and those leading to changes in immunosuppression therapy were retrospectively analyzed.The mean time to first protocol biopsy after transplantation was 5.5 (±4.5) years for PSC patients and 9.3 (±6.6) years for PBC patients. More than 1 abnormal histopathological parameter was found in 43% and 62% of PSC and PBC patients, respectively. However, the histology was interpreted as normal by the pathologist in 78% of PSC and 60% of PBC patients. Immunosuppression therapy was reduced in 10% and increased in 6% patients due to protocol biopsy findings. Biopsies leading to increased immunosuppression therapy had more portal (P = .004), endothelial (P = .008), interphase (P = .021), and lobular (P = .000) inflammation.Mild histopathological findings were frequently found in the protocol biopsies despite the normal biochemistry. PBC patients had more histological abnormalities than those transplanted due to PSC; however, PBC patients had longer follow-up times. Immunosuppression therapy could be safely increased or decreased according to protocol biopsy findings after multidisciplinary meeting discussions.

Health-related quality of life before and after liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Background and aims: Liver transplantation (LTx) remains the only curative treatment in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and liver failure. In Helsinki we have also performed pre-emptive LTx in PSC patients without liver insufficiency but considered to have a high risk for cholangiocarcinoma. The present study evaluates the possible differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in these two PSC groups before and after LTx.Methods: The total study population was 48 patients, 16 were transplanted due to increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma without liver insufficiency (the premalignant group) and 32 patients with end-stage liver disease (the symptomatic group).Results: HRQoL remained good after LTx in the premalignant group, and this difference was also clinically important compared with the symptomatic group, although not statistically significant. Both groups had slightly lower mean HRQoL scores after LTx than the age- and gender-standardized general population, and this difference was not clinically important in either group and statistically significant only in the symptomatic group.Conclusions: HRQoL does not decrease markedly after LTx in the premalignant PSC group, and this group does cope better than the symptomatic PSC group. After LTx, mean HRQoL of the premalignant group stays close to that of the age- and gender-standardized general population.

Suspicious brush cytology is an indication for liver transplantation evaluation in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

AIM: To investigate markers for high-grade dysplasia for the optimal timing of liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). METHODS: Earlier data support a dysplasia-carcinoma sequence, even low- to high-grade dysplasia, in PSC-associated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Surveillance using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and brush cytology aims to detect cases of biliary dysplasia, and liver transplantation is an option in cases with suspicion of malignancy in brushing. This study investigated markers to identify patients with high-grade biliary dysplasia for optimal timing in early liver transplantation. Patients undergoing surveillance using ERC and brush cytology during 2008-2014 and who were diagnosed with biliary dysplasia in explanted liver or CCA until February 2016 were included in the study. Demographic data, cholangiography findings, laboratory values, cytological morphology and DNA ploidy were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty PSC patients had biliary neoplasia in the explanted liver during the study period. Sixteen of these patients had low-grade dysplasia, 10 patients had high-grade dysplasia, and 4 patients had CCA. Fifteen PSC patients diagnosed with CCA were not transplanted. Patients with low-grade dysplasia were younger. Alkaline phosphatase or carcinoembryonic antigen values did not differ between groups during surveillance, but carbohydrate antigen 19-9 was higher in CCA patients. No difference in PSC duration, ERC scores, suspicious cytology, or ploidy analysis was found between groups. No difference was observed between fibrosis stage in explanted livers. Low- and high-grade dysplasia could not be differentiated before liver transplantation based on liver enzymes, tumour markers, ERC scores, brush cytology or DNA ploidy. CONCLUSION: Repeated suspicion of neoplasia in brush cytology should be an indication for evaluations of liver transplantation prior to the development of CCA.

Value of brush cytology for optimal timing of liver transplantation in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with a high risk of cholangiocarcinoma. Here, we investigated the value of surveillance for dysplasia using brush cytology, to determine the optimal timing of liver transplantation in primary sclerosing cholangitis. We compared our preoperative findings, with the final explanted liver histopathology. METHODS: 126 consecutive patients were transplanted for primary sclerosing cholangitis from 1984 to 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: symptomatic (n=91), and asymptomatic (n=35). RESULTS: Brush cytology was available for 101 patients; 66 symptomatic and 35 asymptomatic. Suspicious cytological findings were found in nine patients (14%) in the symptomatic group and 17 (49%) in the asymptomatic group. DNA flow cytometry was available for 49 patients (25 symptomatic, 24 asymptomatic), with aneuploidy detected in six patients (24%) in the symptomatic group and 15 (63%) in the asymptomatic group. Explanted liver histology showed biliary dysplasia or cholangiocarcinoma in 11 symptomatic patients (12%) and 15 asymptomatic patients (43%). A combination of cytological and DNA flow cytometry findings resulted in a test sensitivity of 68%, with a specificity of 86%. Ten-year survival in the asymptomatic group was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: Dysplasia surveillance using brush specimens may help to select those patients likely to benefit from early liver transplantation. It remains unclear as to whether surveillance with brush cytology improves long-term survival, but there is presently no better method with which to predict transplantation timing.