ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gastric non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter (NHPH) species naturally associated with animals have been linked with gastric disease in human patients. AIM: The prevalence and clinical significance of zoonotic gastric NHPHs was determined in large and well-defined, H. pylori-negative, gastric patient populations. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively (n = 464) and prospectively (n = 65) included for gastric biopsy collection: chronic gastritis (CG), peptic ulcer disease and gastric MALT lymphoma, without identified aetiology. PCR and sequencing was performed for the detection of gastric Helicobacter species. Retrospectively, asymptomatic gastric bypass patients (n = 38) were included as controls. Prospectively, additional saliva samples and symptom and risk factor questionnaires were collected. In this group, patients with gastric NHPH infection were administered standard H. pylori eradication therapy and underwent follow-up gastroscopy post-therapy. RESULTS: In the retrospective samples, the prevalence of gastric NHPHs was 29.1%, while no gastric NHPHs were detected in control biopsies. In the prospective cohort, a similar proportion tested positive: 27.7% in gastric tissue and 20.6% in saliva. The sensitivity and accuracy for the detection of gastric NHPHs in saliva compared to gastric tissue was 27.8% and 69.8% respectively. Following eradication therapy, clinical remission was registered in 12 of 17 patients, histological remission in seven of nine and eradication in four of eight patients. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a pathophysiological involvement of NHPHs in gastric disease. Patients presenting with gastric complaints may benefit from routine PCR testing for zoonotic gastric NHPHs.
Subject(s)
Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone , Stomach Neoplasms , Animals , Humans , Helicobacter pylori/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Clinical Relevance , Prospective Studies , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/pathology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has gained acceptance as an effective treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in selected patients, providing similar oncologic outcomes compared to open liver resection (OLR). The aim of this study was to determine prognostic factors for survival outcomes associated with LLR for CRLM. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed. The inclusion period ranged from September 2011 until mid-March 2020. RESULTS: Two hundred consecutive LLRs were included. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates equalled 54.8% and 49%, respectively. A pushing (HR = 5.42, 95% CI 1.56-18.88, p = 0.008), as well as a replacement (3.87, 1.05-14.2, p = 0.04) growth pattern of the CRLM, poor differentiation of the primary colorectal cancer (CRC) (3.72, 1.72-8.07, p < 0.001) and administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (2.95, 1.28-6.8, p = 0.01) were identified as independent predictors of a worse OS. Requirement of more than 6 cycles of NAC (6.17, 2.37-16.03, p < 0.001), a replacement (4.96, 1.91-12.87, p < 0.001), as well as a pushing (4.3, 1.68-11, p = 0.002) growth pattern of the CRLM and poor differentiation of the primary CRC (2.61, 1.31-5.2, p = 0.006) were identified as independent predictors of a worse DFS. CONCLUSION: LLR for CRLM offers adequate long-term oncologic outcomes. OS and DFS rates are negatively affected by the administration of NAC and by pathological features, including the differentiation grade of the primary CRC and the histological growth pattern of the CRLM.
