ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Individual colorectal polyp risk factors are well characterized; however, insights into their pathway-specific interactions are scarce. We aimed to identify the impact of individual risk factors and their joint effects on adenomatous (AP) and serrated polyp (SP) risk. METHODS: We collected information on 363 lifestyle and metabolic parameters from 1597 colonoscopy participants, resulting in over 521,000 data points. We used multivariate statistics and machine-learning approaches to assess associations of single variables and their interactions with AP and SP risk. RESULTS: Individual factors and their interactions showed common and polyp subtype-specific effects. Abdominal obesity, high body mass index (BMI), metabolic syndrome, and red meat consumption globally increased polyp risk. Age, gender, and western diet associated with AP risk, while smoking was associated with SP risk. CRC family history was associated with advanced adenomas and diabetes with sessile serrated lesions. Regarding lifestyle factor interactions, no lifestyle or dietary adjustments mitigated the adverse smoking effect on SP risk, whereas its negative effect was exacerbated by alcohol in the conventional pathway. The adverse effect of red meat on SP risk was not ameliorated by any factor, but was further exacerbated by western diet along the conventional pathway. No modification of any factor reduced the negative impact of metabolic syndrome on AP risk, whereas increased fatless fish or meat substitutes' intake mitigated its effect on SP risk. CONCLUSIONS: Individual risk factors and their interactions for polyp formation along the adenomatous and serrated pathways are strongly heterogeneous. Our findings may facilitate tailored lifestyle recommendations and contribute to a better understanding of how risk factor combinations impact colorectal carcinogenesis.
Subject(s)
Adenoma , Adenomatous Polyps , Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Metabolic Syndrome , Humans , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Colonic Polyps/etiology , Metabolic Syndrome/etiology , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Adenoma/epidemiology , Adenoma/etiology , Adenoma/pathology , Risk Factors , Colonoscopy , Adenomatous Polyps/epidemiology , Adenomatous Polyps/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a rapidly emerging, chronic inflammatory disorder. Prolonged inflammation evokes structural alterations and a fragile esophageal wall prone to perforation/rupture and food impaction. This report assesses the risk of spontaneously arising and procedure-induced complications and proposes practical recommendations. METHODS: The Swiss Esophageal Esophagitis Database documented 251 confirmed cases. A chart review identified which patients had required endoscopic bolus removal and/or experienced transmural esophageal perforation/rupture. In addition, a MEDLINE search for "eosinophilic esophagitis" with "esophageal perforation" or "esophageal rupture" was undertaken. RESULTS: During an 18-year period, 87 patients (34.7%) experienced 134 food impactions requiring flexible (124, 92.5%) or rigid (10, 7.5%) endoscopic bolus removal. Transmural perforation occurred in 20% (2/10) of rigid procedures, and 1 esophageal rupture (Boerhaave's syndrome) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bolus removal by rigid endoscopy is a high-risk procedure and should be avoided in eosinophilic esophagitis patients who require a gentler approach. Whether food impaction and esophageal wall remodeling can be prevented with anti-inflammatory medication is still undetermined. All Boerhaave's syndrome cases should be evaluated for underlying eosinophilic esophagitis.
Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Eosinophilia/complications , Esophageal Perforation/etiology , Esophageal Stenosis/etiology , Esophagitis/complications , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Esophageal Perforation/epidemiology , Esophageal Stenosis/epidemiology , Esophagitis/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Food , Humans , Male , Registries , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Switzerland , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Regulation of magnesium balance is achieved by a steady-state mechanism in which intake and output are maintained at an equal level. Dietary magnesium intake, total and ionized plasma magnesium levels, and urinary magnesium were assessed in 46 renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine, nine transplant recipients who had never been on cyclosporine, and 31 healthy volunteers. Dietary magnesium intake [13.5 (11.0-15.1) mmol/day vs 13.0 (11.1-16.0) mmol/day and 13.7 (11.4-16.7) mmol/day, respectively; median and interquartile range] and urinary magnesium excretion [4.31 (3.57-5.89) vs 4.39 (3.56-6.02) and 5.01 (3.73-6.01) mmol/day, respectively] were similar in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine, transplant recipients who had never been on cyclosporine, and control subjects. Total [0.74 (0.70-0.78) vs 0.80 (0.74-0.84) and 0.81 (0.79-0.87) mmol/l), respectively] and ionized [0.49 (0.46-0.52) vs 0.53 (0.50-0.58) and 0.54 (0.52-0.59) mmol/l, respectively] plasma magnesium were significantly lower in renal transplant recipients on cyclosporine than in transplant recipients without cyclosporine, and healthy controls. These observations indicate a modified magnesium steady state in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine.
