Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0145215, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26771309

ABSTRACT

Well-developed point-of-care (POC) cancer screening tools have the potential to provide better cancer care to patients in both developed and developing countries. However, new medical technology will not be adopted by medical providers unless it addresses a population's existing needs and end-users' preferences. The goals of our study were to assess primary care providers' level of awareness, interest, and preferences in using POC cancer screening technology in their practice and to provide guidelines to biomedical engineers for future POC technology development. A total of 350 primary care providers completed a one-time self-administered online survey, which took approximately 10 minutes to complete. A $50 Amazon gift card was given as an honorarium for the first 100 respondents to encourage participation. The description of POC cancer screening technology was provided in the beginning of the survey to ensure all participants had a basic understanding of what constitutes POC technology. More than half of the participants (57%) stated that they heard of the term "POC technology" for the first time when they took the survey. However, almost all of the participants (97%) stated they were either "very interested" (68%) or "somewhat interested" (29%) in using POC cancer screening technology in their practice. Demographic characteristics such as the length of being in the practice of medicine, the percentage of patients on Medicaid, and the average number of patients per day were not shown to be associated with the level of interest in using POC. These data show that there is a great interest in POC cancer screening technology utilization among this population of primary care providers and vast room for future investigations to further understand the interest and preferences in using POC cancer technology in practice. Ensuring that the benefits of new technology outweigh the costs will maximize the likelihood it will be used by medical providers and patients.


Subject(s)
Awareness , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Health Personnel , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Point-of-Care Systems , Primary Health Care , Clinical Competence , Epidemiologic Factors , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Technology
2.
Am J Public Health ; 104(10): 1912-9, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25121817

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We examined the relationship between gun ownership and stranger versus nonstranger homicide rates. METHODS: Using data from the Supplemental Homicide Reports of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports for all 50 states for 1981 to 2010, we modeled stranger and nonstranger homicide rates as a function of state-level gun ownership, measured by a proxy, controlling for potential confounders. We used a negative binomial regression model with fixed effects for year, accounting for clustering of observations among states by using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: We found no robust, statistically significant correlation between gun ownership and stranger firearm homicide rates. However, we found a positive and significant association between gun ownership and nonstranger firearm homicide rates. The incidence rate ratio for nonstranger firearm homicide rate associated with gun ownership was 1.014 (95% confidence interval=1.009, 1.019). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings challenge the argument that gun ownership deters violent crime, in particular, homicides.


Subject(s)
Firearms/statistics & numerical data , Homicide/statistics & numerical data , Ownership , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Crime/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Prevalence , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...