Reducing the environmental impact of mask inductions in children: A quality improvement report.

BACKGROUND: Inhalational anesthetic agents are potent greenhouse gases with global warming potential that far exceed that of carbon dioxide. Traditionally, pediatric inhalation inductions are achieved with a volatile anesthetic delivered to the patient in oxygen and nitrous oxide at high fresh gas flows. While contemporary volatile anesthetics and anesthesia machines allow for a more environmentally conscious induction, practice has not changed. We aimed to reduce the environmental impact of our inhalation inductions by decreasing the use of nitrous oxide and fresh gas flows. METHODS: Through a series of four plan-do-study-act cycles, the improvement team used content experts to demonstrate the environmental impact of the current inductions and to provide practical ways to reduce this, by focusing on nitrous oxide use and fresh gas flows, with visual reminders introduced at point of delivery. The primary measures were the percentage of inhalation inductions that used nitrous oxide and the maximum fresh gas flows/kg during the induction period. Statistical process control charts were used to measure improvement over time. RESULTS: 33 285 inhalation inductions were included over a 20-month period. nitrous oxide use decreased from 80% to <20% and maximum fresh gas flows/kg decreased from a rate of 0.53 L/min/kg to 0.38 L/min/kg, an overall reduction of 28%. Reduction in fresh gas flows was greatest in the lightest weight groups. Induction times and behaviors remained unchanged over the duration of this project. CONCLUSIONS: Our quality improvement group decreased the environmental impact of inhalation inductions and created cultural change within our department to sustain change and foster the pursuit of future environmental efforts.

Increasing Cefazolin Use for Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Penicillin-Allergic Children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cefazolin, a first-generation cephalosporin, is the most commonly recommended antibiotic for perioperative prophylaxis to reduce surgical site infections. Children with a reported penicillin allergy often receive an alternative antibiotic because of a common misunderstanding of the cross-reactivity between these antibiotics. This use of alternative antibiotics in surgical populations have been associated with increased infections, antibiotic resistance, and health care costs. We aimed to increase the percentage of patients with nonsevere penicillin-class allergies who receive cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team conducted this quality improvement initiative, with a series of 3 plan-do-study-act cycles aimed at children with nonsevere penicillin-class allergies undergoing surgical procedures that require antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of surgical encounters among patients with nonsevere penicillin-class allergies who received cefazolin as antibiotic prophylaxis. Statistical process control charts were used to measure improvement over time. RESULTS: Approximately 400 children were involved in this project. There was special cause variation and a shift in the center line from 60% to 80% of eligible patients receiving cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis, which was sustained for the duration of the project. In the last month, 90% of eligible patient received cefazolin, surpassing our goal of 85%. This improvement has been sustained in the 5 months after project completion. We had no cases of severe allergic reactions in the operating room. CONCLUSIONS: Our multidisciplinary education-focused interventions were associated with a significant increase in the use of cefazolin for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patient with penicillin allergies.