Salvage treatment with irinotecan/cisplatin versus pemetrexed/cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer pre-treated with a non-platinum-based regimen in the first-line setting: a randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

Background. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard front-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, non-platinum combinations of third-generation chemotherapeutic agents are considered an alternative therapeutic option for patients who cannot tolerate the toxic effects of platinum compounds. In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC) was compared to pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PC) regimen, in platinum-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC, who had been previously treated with the combination of a taxane plus gemcitabine. Patients and methods. A total of 124 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to either irinotecan 110 mg/m2 on day 1 and 100 mg/m2 on day 8 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 8 every 3 weeks (IC arm) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (PC arm). The primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR). Results. The ORR and median progression-free survival (PFS) in the IC arm were 18 % and 3.3 months, respectively, while in the PC arm were 19 % and 4.2 months (p = ns). Median overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in patients with PC (6.9 vs. 10.9; p = 0.013). PC regimen had a better toxicity profile compared to IC, with a statistically significant lower incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (3 vs. 31 %; p = 0.0001) and diarrhea (1.6 vs. 14.7 %, p = 0.018). Conclusions. In patients with advanced NSCLC pretreated with docetaxel/gemcitabine, the combination of pemetrexed/cisplatin is associated with increased OS and is better tolerated than the combination of irinotecan/cisplatin and should be considered as a valid therapeutic option for platinum-naive, previously treated patients (AU)

No disponible

Salvage treatment with irinotecan/cisplatin versus pemetrexed/cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer pre-treated with a non-platinum-based regimen in the first-line setting: a randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard front-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, non-platinum combinations of third-generation chemotherapeutic agents are considered an alternative therapeutic option for patients who cannot tolerate the toxic effects of platinum compounds. In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC) was compared to pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PC) regimen, in platinum-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC, who had been previously treated with the combination of a taxane plus gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 124 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to either irinotecan 110 mg/m2 on day 1 and 100 mg/m2 on day 8 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 8 every 3 weeks (IC arm) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (PC arm). The primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The ORR and median progression-free survival (PFS) in the IC arm were 18 % and 3.3 months, respectively, while in the PC arm were 19 % and 4.2 months (p = ns). Median overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in patients with PC (6.9 vs. 10.9; p = 0.013). PC regimen had a better toxicity profile compared to IC, with a statistically significant lower incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (3 vs. 31 %; p = 0.0001) and diarrhea (1.6 vs. 14.7 %, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced NSCLC pretreated with docetaxel/gemcitabine, the combination of pemetrexed/cisplatin is associated with increased OS and is better tolerated than the combination of irinotecan/cisplatin and should be considered as a valid therapeutic option for platinum-naive, previously treated patients. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00614965.

Docetaxel, gemcitabine and bevacizumab as salvage chemotherapy for HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and safety of the docetaxel, gemcitabine and bevacizumab combination, administered biweekly, in pretreated patients with HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with HER-2-negative MBC, and disease progression after at least one prior line of chemotherapy, were treated with docetaxel 50 mg/m², gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m² and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Bevacizumab was continued until disease progression. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients have been enrolled. Their median age was 61 years, 95.8 % had a performance status 0-1, 83.3 % had hormone receptor-positive disease, and 47.9 % had received one prior line of chemotherapy. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 45 for response. Partial response was achieved in 20 patients [PR = 44.4 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 29.9-59 %] and disease stabilization in 15 (33.3 %). The median progression-free survival was 7.1 months (95 % CI 4.7-9.5 months) and the median overall survival 21.1 months (95 % CI 10.3-31.9 months). Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 19 patients (39.6 %) and febrile neutropenia in 2 (4.2 %). Most common grade 2-3 non-hematologic adverse events included nausea (10.4 %), diarrhea (10.5 %), neurotoxicity (12.5 %) and fatigue (31.3 %), whereas grade 2 hemorrhage and hypertension occurred in 6.3 and 10.4 %, respectively. There were no grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities or toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination of docetaxel, gemcitabine and bevacizumab has promising activity and manageable toxicity as salvage chemotherapy for HER-2-negative MBC patients.

Differential effect of adjuvant taxane-based and taxane-free chemotherapy regimens on the CK-19 mRNA-positive circulating tumour cells in patients with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To determine the effect of adjuvant taxane-free and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens on the elimination of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in patients with early breast cancer. METHODS: The presence of CK-19 mRNA-positive CTCs in the peripheral blood was evaluated before and after chemotherapy, using a real-time RT-PCR assay, in a historical comparison of two cohorts of women with stage I-III breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxane-free (N=211; FE(75)C or E(75)C) and taxane-based (N=334; T/E(75)C or T/E(75)) chemotherapy. RESULTS: Taxane-based chemotherapy resulted in a higher incidence of CTCs' elimination than taxane-free regimens since 49.7% (74 of 149) and 33.0% (29 of 88) of patients with detectable CTCs before chemotherapy, respectively, turned negative post-chemotherapy (P=0.015). Patients treated with taxane-free regimens had a significantly lower disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.035) than patients treated with taxane-based regimens; this difference was observed in patients with but not without detectable CTCs before chemotherapy (P=0.018 and P=0.481, respectively). The incidence of deaths was significantly higher in the taxane-free cohort of patients with but not without detectable CTCs before chemotherapy compared with that of the taxane-based cohort (P=0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that the chemotherapy regimen was significantly associated with prolonged DFS (HR: 2.00; 95% CI=1.20-3.34). CONCLUSION: Elimination of CK-19 mRNA-positive CTCs during adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be an efficacy indicator of treatment and is associated with a favourable clinical outcome of patients with detectable CTCs before chemotherapy.

A triplet combination with irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin (LOHP), continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOXIRI) plus cetuximab as first-line treatment in KRAS wt, metastatic colorectal cancer: a pilot phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: We conducted an open-label, pilot phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Thirty patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC, <70 years and with performance status 0-1 were included in the trial. RESULTS: Complete and partial responses were observed in 4 (13.3%) and 17 (56.7%) patients, respectively (overall response rate (ORR)=70%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 53.6%-86.4%); 8 patients (26.7%) had stable disease and 1 had progressive disease. The median time to tumour progression was 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.1-13.4) and the overall median survival time was 30.3 months (95% CI: 18.8-41.9). Secondary R0 resection was performed in 11 (37%) patients. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea and neutropenia were observed in 16 (53%) and 7 (23.3%) patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia observed in 2 (6.6%) patients. Neurotoxicity grade 2 or 3 was reported in 7 (23.3%) and in 2 (6.7%) patients, respectively, and grade 3 rush was reported in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: The FOLFOXIRI/cetuximab combination presented increased activity in terms of response rate and R0 secondary liver metastases resection, and merits further investigation, especially in patients with initially unresectable disease confined to the liver.

Paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as salvage treatment in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a Hellenic oncology research group multicenter phase II study.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of biweekly paclitaxel and carboplatin combination in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with paclitaxel at the dose of 135 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin AUC 3 on day 1 every 2 weeks in cycles of 28 days. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer were enrolled, and all of them had received frontline chemotherapy with docetaxel and prednisone, while 24 (63.2 %) had received 2 or more prior chemotherapy regimens. In an intention-to-treatment analysis, a clinical and/or biochemical response (>50 % decline) was observed in 10 patients (26.3 %; 95 % CI, 12.3-40.3 %), stable disease in 13 (34.2 %) and progressive disease in 15 (39.5 %). The median duration of response was 6.1 months (range, 1.0-9.8), the median time to tumor progression (TTP) 3.6 months (95 % CI, 2.1-5.2) and the median overall survival 9.9 months (95 % CI, 6.2-13.6). The probability for 1-year survival was 43 %. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in three (7.9 %) and nine (23.7 %) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The biweekly administration of paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer is an active and well-tolerated regimen which merits to be further evaluated in the context of salvage treatment.

A multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel plus gemcitabine as salvage treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the docetaxel-gemcitabine (DG) combination administered every 2 weeks as salvage therapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Thirty women with MBC who had disease progression after chemotherapy with anthracyclines, or anthracyclines and taxanes were treated with docetaxel 50 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m² on days 1 and 14 in cycles of 28 days. All patients had received prior anthracyclines, and fourteen (46.6%) had also received prior taxanes. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 24 for response to treatment. RESULTS: Complete response occurred in four (13.3%) patients and partial response in 10 (33.3%) for an overall response rate of 46.7% (95% CI 28.8-64.5). Seven patients (23.3%) had stable disease and nine (30%) progressive disease. Of the 14 patients previously treated with both anthracyclines and taxanes, seven (50%) responded. The median duration of response was 4.8 months (range 1.9-15.3), the median time to disease progression 6.6 months (range 0.5-16.9) and the median overall survival 16.8 months (range 1.3-53.2). There was no treatment-related toxic death. Neutropenia was the only grade 4 toxicity occurring in three (10%) patients. None of them developed neutropenic fever. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in two (6.7%) patients. Non-hematological toxicities were manageable. CONCLUSION: The DG combination administered biweekly is very well tolerated and effective in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with MBC. A previous treatment with taxanes does not preclude a good clinical response to this regimen.

Clinical outcome of patients with various advanced cancer types vaccinated with an optimized cryptic human telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) peptide: results of an expanded phase II study.

BACKGROUND: TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase) plays a critical role in tumor cell growth and survival. In an expanded phase II study, we evaluated the immunological and clinical responses to the TERT-targeting Vx-001 vaccine in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: HLA-A*0201-positive patients received two subcutaneous injections of the optimized TERT(572Y) peptide followed by four injections of the native TERT(572) peptide, every 3 weeks. Peptide-specific immune responses were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot at baseline, and after the second and the sixth vaccinations. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled and 34 (62%) completed the six vaccinations. A TERT-specific T-cell immune response was observed in 55% and 70% of patients after the second and the sixth vaccinations, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) was 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 24% to 49%], including one complete and one partial response. Immunologically responding patients had a better clinical outcome than nonresponders [DCR: 44% versus 14% (P = 0.047); progression-free survival (PFS): 5.2 versus 2.2 months (P = 0.0001) and overall survival: 20 versus 10 months (P = 0.041)]. Multivariate analysis revealed that the immunological response was an independent variable associated with increased PFS (hazard ratio = 3.35; 95% CI 1.7-6.7). CONCLUSION: Vx-001 vaccine was well tolerated and induced a TERT-specific immunological response, which was significantly correlated with improved clinical outcome.

Metronomic vinorelbine plus bevacizumab as salvage therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Continuous administration of oral vinorelbine, given 3 times a week (metronomic), is feasible and exceptionally well tolerated at doses up to 50 mg with clinical activity against refractory tumors. In this phase II study oral metronomic vinorelbine and bevacizumab were evaluated as salvage therapy in women with pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Patients received oral vinorelbine (50 mg 3 times a week) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) biweekly in cycles of 28 days. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). A preplanned analysis was performed when the first 13 patients were evaluated for tumor response. RESULTS: One patient (7.7%) achieved partial response (PR) and 6 (46.1%) stable disease (SD). The combination was very well tolerated but, as per protocol, the study was closed prematurely due to lack of efficacy. CONCLUSION: The combination of oral metronomic vinorelbine and bevacizumab has good tolerance but minimal activity in terms of objective responses in pretreated patients with MBC.

Efficacy and treatment tolerance in older patients with NSCLC: a meta-analysis of five phase III randomized trials conducted by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of newly diagnosed cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are observed in patients >65 years, while 30%-40% of cases occur in patients >70 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The objective of the current study was to determine (i) the number of elderly (>70 years) patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC enrolled in phase III trials of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group, (ii) the treatment-related toxicity observed in these patients compared with their younger counterparts, and (iii) the differences in terms of response rate, time to tumor progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) between younger and older patients. RESULTS: Pooled data from five clinical trials including 1845 patients were analyzed; 1421 (77%) and 424 (23%) were <70 years and ≥70 years, respectively. No difference was observed in terms of the overall response rate and TTP. There was an OS difference between young and older patients, with higher risk for death in older patients. However, when the analysis was carried out after omitting a trial that showed a different trend, no difference was observed. Older patients experienced higher toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This report supports the feasibility of chemotherapy treatment for older NSCLC patients. Optimization of treatment of older NSCLC patients requires the design of prospective older-specific phase III trials for these patients.

Etoposide plus cisplatin followed by concurrent chemo-radiotherapy and irinotecan plus cisplatin for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: A multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: The combination of irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) has shown at least comparable efficacy to that of etoposide/cisplatin (EP) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of EP regimen followed by thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and IP consolidation chemotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three chemotherapy-naive patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) were treated with etoposide 100mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and cisplatin 80mg/m(2) on day 1. Radiotherapy was given 3 weeks after the first treatment cycle concurrently with weekly cisplatin 20mg/m(2) on day 1 and etoposide 50mg/m(2) on day 4 within 5-6 weeks, followed by three courses of irinotecan 60mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 60mg/m(2) on day 1 of a 4-week cycle. RESULTS: There were no treatment-related deaths. Toxicities during chemo-radiotherapy were mild including grade 3/4 neutropenia (24%) and grade 2 esophagitis (6%). The major toxicity observed during consolidation chemotherapy was grades 3-4 neutropenia which affected 42% of patients. In an intention-to-treat analysis the overall response rate was 66% (CR: 30% and PR: 36%). After a median follow-up period of 35.7 months (range: 9.6-41.2 months), the median survival time was 19 months (95% CI: 14.5-23.5 months), the median time to tumor progression 8.3 months and the 1- and 2-year survival rates 72% and 27.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation chemotherapy with IP following concurrent EP plus TRT is a safe and with acceptable toxicity regimen and deserves further phase III testing in patients with LS-SCLC.

Modified CAPOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) regimen every two weeks as second-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with irinotecan-based frontline therapy: a multicenter phase II study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of capecitabine (CAP) given every other week and biweekly oxaliplatin (OX; modified CAPOX regimen) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with irinote- can-based frontline chemotherapy. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled; the median age was 62 years and 62 (92.5%) had a performance status (ECOG) of 0-1. OX and CAP were administered at the dose of 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 2,000 mg/m(2) on days 1-7, respectively, every 2 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 429 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 4 (6%) and 2 (3%) patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia complicated 1 treatment cycle. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 peripheral sensory neurotoxicity (10% of patients) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (7%). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 3 (4.5%) complete and 13 (19.4%) partial responses (overall response rate 24%) were observed. Seventeen (24.5%) patients had stable and 27 (40.3%) progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression and overall survival were 5 months and 11.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the modified CAPOX regimen is safe and effective as salvage treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who were previously treated with irinotecan-based frontline therapy.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with front-line docetaxel-gemcitabine chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Front-line docetaxel-gemcitabine (DG) combination represents an alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. One of its more common side effects is neutropenia. The association between the grade of DG-induced neutropenia and the clinical outcome was analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred fifty-eight patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC, treated with front-line DG were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into three groups according to the presented worst neutropenia grade: absent (grade 0), mild (grades I/II) and severe (grades III/IV). RESULTS: Response rate, median time to tumor progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) were significantly better in patients developing any grade of neutropenia compared with those without neutropenia. The median TTPs were 3.0, 5.4 and 5.6 months for the groups with absent, mild and severe neutropenia, respectively; the median OSs were 7.9, 12.5 and 11.2 months for the same groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that both mild and severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia were independent factors associated with a better TTP and OS survival. CONCLUSION: Although DG-induced neutropenia was emerged as an independent prognostic factor, it remains to be demonstrated in prospective studies that dose escalation of chemotherapy drugs in patients who do not develop neutropenia may improve the clinical efficacy.

Dose escalating clinical study of high dose infusional 5-fluorouracil and leukovorin (AIO regimen) plus alternate weekly administration of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of weekly high dose 5-fluorouracil (5FU) continuous infusion and leukovorin (LV) alternatively combined with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received a fixed dose of LV (500 mg/m(2)) over 2 h infusion on weeks 1 to 4 and escalated doses of: oxaliplatin (starting dose 65 mg/m(2): 120 min i.v. infusion on weeks 1 and 3); irinotecan (starting dose 80 mg/m(2); 90 min i.v. infusion on weeks 2 and 4) and 5FU (starting dose 1500 mg/m(2); 22 h continuous i.v. infusion, on weeks 1 to 4), in cycles of 5 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the fi rst cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were treated on 8 dose levels and all but two patients received the regimen at least as second-line treatment. The DLT level was reached at the oxaliplatin dose of 90 mg/m(2), irinotecan dose of 110 mg/m(2), LV dose of 500 mg/m(2) and 5FU dose of 1750 mg/m(2); the recommended MTDs were 85 mg/m(2) for oxaliplatin, 110 mg/m(2) for irinotecan, 1750 mg/m(2) for 5FU and 500 mg/m(2) for LV. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and grade 3 nausea/vomiting were the dose-limiting events. Diarrhea was the most common toxicity of the regimen, occurring in 12 (42.8%) patients. Hematological toxicity was mild and there were no treatment- related deaths. CONCLUSION: This weekly regimen showed a favorable toxicity profile and merits further investigation in patients with advanced/metastatic tumors of the GI tract.

Irinotecan plus weekly 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as salvage treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (CPT-11/5-FU/LV (AIO schedule)) as salvage treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 33 patients relapsing after oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-based first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Their median age was 69 years, 20 (61%) patients were male, and performance status (WHO) was 0, 1, and 2 in 15, 16 and 2 patients respectively; prior surgery 20 (61%) patients; adjuvant chemotherapy 11 (33%) patients, and adjuvant radiotherapy 6 (18%) patients. The number of metastatic sites was 1, 2, and > or =3 in 11, 11, and 11 patients, respectively. CPT-11 was administered on day 1 at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) in 30-90 min infusion and LV (500 mg/m(2)) on the same day as a 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU (2,600 mg/m(2)/day) as a 22-hour infusion on day 1 for 6 subsequent weeks. The regimen was repeated every 7 weeks. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for toxicity and for response. Complete response was achieved in 2 patients (6%) and partial response in 4 patients (12%) (RR 18%, CI 5.95-35.43%); 13 patients (40%) had stable disease, and 14 (42%) progressive disease. After a median follow-up period of 9 months, the median duration of response was 5 months, the median time to progression 7.5 months, and OS 14 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 13 patients (39%), febrile neutropenia in 3 (9%), grade 2 anemia in 11 (33%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 1 (3%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred in 12 patients (36%), grade 3-4 neurotoxicity in 3 (9%), and grade 3 asthenia in 4 (12%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The median dose intensity was 85% for CPT-11, and 88% for 5-FU and LV. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of weekly CPT-11 and infusional 5-FU/LV is an active and relatively well-tolerated regimen as salvage treatment in MCC.

Sequential administration of docetaxel followed by maintenance gefitinib, as salvage treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC: a multicenter phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of the sequential administration of docetaxel followed by gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Forty-one patients pre-treated with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen (platinum- or taxane-based) for advanced/metastatic NSCLC received three cycles of docetaxel 30 mg/m2, administered as a 1-h IV infusion, on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 4-week cycle followed by gefitinib 250 mg daily po. Gefitinib treatment was continued until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of patients consent. RESULTS: Two (4.9%) patients achieved a partial response and 10 (24.4%) stable disease, for a disease control rate of 29.3% (95% CI: 15.3%-43.2%) while on weekly docetaxel treatment. Additionally, progressive disease (PD) was observed in 29 (70.7%). No objective responses were observed during the gefitinib maintenance therapy; however, 17 (41.5%) patients presented stable disease maintained for more than 2 months. Median time to progression was 3.0 months (range: 1-38.3 months; 95% CI: 2.4-3.6); median overall survival 6.9 months (range: 1.2-40.2 months; 95% CI: 5.34-8.52) while the 1-year survival was 28.8%. Therapy was generally well tolerated with diarrhea and rash being the most frequent toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential administration of docetaxel and gefitinib was well tolerated and moderately active against advanced pre-treated NSCLC.

Phase II trial of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) plus cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor and is able to reverse the resistance to irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase II trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of cetuximab combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in the treatment of patients with mCRC progressing under oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Forty patients with mCRC were treated with cetuximab (loading dose 400 mg/m(2) and then 250 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly) in combination with CAPOX (d(1): L-OHP 85 mg/m(2) and d(1-7) capecitabine 2000 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks). Thirty-one (77.5%) and nine (22.5%) patients had oxaliplatin-refractory and -resistant disease, respectively; in addition, 32 (80%) patients had also progressed on prior irinotecan-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four cycles were administered (median of four cycles per patient). Main toxic effects included grade 3-4 neutropenia (12.5%), grade 3/4 diarrhea (7.5%), grade 3 fatigue (2.5%), and grade 2-3 neurotoxicity (22.5%). One (2.5%) complete and seven (17.5%) partial responses were achieved [overall objective response rate (ORR): 20%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9% to 32%)], whereas 11 (27.5%) patients had stable disease [disease control rate (DCR): 47.5%; 95% CI: 30.2% to 64.5%]. The ORR and DCR were 18.7% and 46.8%, respectively, in patients with oxaliplatin-refractory disease. The median time to tumor progression was 3 months, the median survival 10.7 months and the probability of 1-year survival rate 53.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cetuximab plus CAPOX is safe and has a promising activity in patients with mCRC refractory or resistant to oxaliplatin.

A dose-escalation study of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and oxaliplatin combination in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with advanced-stage solid tumors received escalating doses of PLD 25-50 mg/m(2) as 60-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion and oxaliplatin 80-130 mg/m(2) as 2- to 4-hour i.v. infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks without growth factors. RESULTS: MTD was defined at PLD 45 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2). Eleven dose levels were evaluated and DLTs were grade 2-3 neutropenia resulting in treatment delays, grade 3 neurotoxicity and nausea/vomiting. A total of 187 cycles were administered with two episodes of febrile neutropenia and one toxic death due to sepsis. Two (4%) and 6 (13%) patients developed grade 4 and 3 neutropenia, respectively, 2 (4%) and 1 (2%) grade 4 and 3 thrombocytopenia, and 1 (2%) grade 4 anemia. The most common nonhematological toxicities were grade 2-3 nausea/vomiting and asthenia observed in 27 (60%) and 16 (36%) of patients, respectively. One complete and eight partial responses were observed. CONCLUSION: The combination of PLD and oxaliplatin has an acceptable toxicity profile with promising activity and merits further evaluation in phase II studies.

A dose escalation study of gemcitabine plus pemetrexed administered biweekly in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and identify the dose-limiting toxicities of the biweekly administration of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalated doses of gemcitabine and pemetrexed (starting doses 1,250 and 300 mg/m(2), respectively) both given on days 1 and 15 in cycles of 4 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were treated at 7 dose levels. The MTD was reached at the dose of 1,750 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine and 450 mg/m(2) for pemetrexed. Dose-limiting events were grade IV neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and treatment delay due to grade III hematological toxicities. One partial response in a pretreated patient with ovarian cancer was observed, while 4 other patients experienced stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The biweekly administration of gemcitabine plus pemetrexed at the recommended MTDs is safe, well tolerated and demonstrates antitumor activity which merits further evaluation in phase II studies.

A dose escalation study of biweekly oral vinorelbine and gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and the dose-limiting toxicities of a biweekly administration of oral vinorelbine and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with advanced stage solid tumors were enrolled, and 12 (42.9%) of them were chemotherapy naive. Escalating doses of vinorelbine (50-70 mg/m2 per os) and gemcitabine (800-1,000 mg/m2 as a 30-min intravenous infusion) were administered on days 1 and 15 in 4-week cycles. RESULTS: MTDs were reached at 70 mg/m2 p.o. for vinorelbine and 900 mg/m2 for gemcitabine. Grade 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, grade 4 nausea/vomiting and treatment delay due to grade 3 neutropenia were the dose-limiting events during the first cycle of chemotherapy. A total of 94 chemotherapy cycles were administered with only one episode of febrile neutropenia and no toxic deaths. Severe (grade 3-4) neutropenia occurred in 10% of cycles while non-hematological toxicity was mild with grade 2-3 asthenia occurring in 17 (18%) cycles. Objective responses were achieved in patients with prostate and non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of biweekly oral vinorelbine (70 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (900 mg/m2) is a well-tolerated regimen with promising results in patients with advanced solid tumors.