Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urology ; 80(5): 1001; discussion 1001, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23107394
2.
J Endourol ; 23(3): 485-8, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19193133

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) is emerging as a viable alternative to traditional open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND). Despite numerous reports confirming clinical oncologic equivalency between the two approaches, however, concerns still remain over the adequacy of laparoscopic dissection. We therefore sought to compare the completeness of dissection between O-RPLND and L-RPLND in a porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen domestic swine were divided into two equivalent groups. Both groups underwent bilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, approximating templates used in human dissection. In one group, the procedure was performed through an open midline incision, while the other group underwent completely laparoscopic dissection. Tissue was independently analyzed by a pathologist, who recorded lymph node yield based on microscopic evaluation. RESULTS: All animals in the L-RPLND group underwent successful procedures, without the need for conversion. Two open procedures were aborted because of hemorrhage. Mean lymph node yield from O-RPLND was 32, while the mean yield for L-RPLND was 29. This difference was not statistically significant (P=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: In the porcine model, L-RPLND is capable of providing a quality of dissection equivalent to that of O-RPLND, in terms of absolute lymph node yield on microscopic examination. The applicability of this data to human patients, however, may be limited by significant anatomic differences between the human and the pig. Further prospective comparison in human patients is critically needed.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Models, Animal , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Animals , Cell Count , Lymph Nodes/cytology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Sus scrofa
3.
Urology ; 69(4): 662-5, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17445647

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with known venous involvement is an emerging technique. The goal of this study was to describe our experience and outcomes with laparoscopic nephrectomy for patients with preoperatively diagnosed level I (renal vein) tumor thrombus. METHODS: The data from all patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy by one surgeon from July 1, 2004 to February 28, 2006 were reviewed. The patients with a preoperatively diagnosed tumor thrombus were included in the study. A pure laparoscopic transperitoneal technique was used with intraoperative ultrasonography to ensure complete removal of the thrombus. The medical records were reviewed for clinical, operative, and follow-up information. RESULTS: Five patients were identified. The mean age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and tumor size were 59.8 years (range 34 to 81), 2.6 (range 2 to 3), and 5.5 cm (range 4 to 6), respectively. The mean operative time and estimated blood loss were 119.6 minutes (range 92 to 180) and 150 mL (range 50 to 300), respectively. The mean hospital stay was 3.6 days (range 2 to 4), and no complications occurred. The final stage was T3b with negative margins in all cases. The mean Fuhrman grade was 2.4 (range 2 to 3). Two patients had known metastases and underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy. These 2 patients were alive at a mean follow-up of 11.5 months. Of the other 3 patients, at a mean follow-up of 8.7 months, 2 had no evidence of disease, and 1 had developed recurrence in the liver and was treated with sorafenib, resulting in tumor regression. CONCLUSIONS: Pure laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy for patients with preoperatively diagnosed level I tumor thrombus is safe and effective in experienced hands. Additional series are needed to examine the long-term oncologic outcomes.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating , Nephrectomy/methods , Renal Veins , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged
4.
J Endourol ; 21(1): 62-4, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17263610

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of increasing age of urology patients on the outcome of laparoscopic procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing laparoscopic urologic procedures from 1998 to 2005, comparing patients 75 or older with all other patients undergoing the same procedures. Data were available on 175 patients. Length of hospitalization, complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, ASA class, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were taken from hospital and outpatient records. Subgroup analysis was performed on older patients, one group aged 65 to 74 years and the other > or =75 years. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed t-test and chi-square test. RESULTS: Patients aged 75 or older had no statistically significant differences in operative time (318 minutes v 319 minutes; P = 0.967), EBL (271 mL v 331 mL; P = 0.487), or complication rate (14.6% v 12.9%; P = 0.434). However, there was a significant increase in the length of stay (6.06 days v 3.74 days; P = 0.0015). In the subgroup analysis of patients 65 to 74 years v > or =75 years, a significant increase in the length of hospitalization was still present despite controlling for complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic procedures in patients 75 years and older entail a significantly longer hospital stay than in younger patients despite similar medical comorbidities. Overall, there was no significant increase in perioperative complications related to age.


Subject(s)
Aging , Laparoscopy , Urologic Surgical Procedures , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Middle Aged
5.
Urology ; 68(2): 416-8, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16904466

ABSTRACT

Hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy continues to be a challenging problem for the laparoscopic surgeon. We have found BioGlue to be highly effective as a hemostatic agent during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.


Subject(s)
Hemostatic Techniques , Laparoscopy , Nephrectomy/methods , Proteins , Humans
6.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am ; 20(4): 879-95, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16861120

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is an increasing medical problem. Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy are effective treatments, but have the risk of significant morbidity. Clinicians have strived to develop new modalities of treatment that can maintain the excellent treatment outcomes of radical prostatectomy, but diminish the morbidity. Improved instrumentation, optics, and robotic technology have allowed the application of laparoscopic techniques to radical prostatectomy. Patients can have less blood loss and expect more rapid recovery. Intermediate oncologic outcomes appear similar to radical prostatectomy with good functional results. Cryotherapy and HIFU are tissue ablative approaches rather than extirpative approaches to prostate cancer treatment. They attempt to use nonsurgical methods to treat prostate cancer with the hope of providing oncologic control comparable to surgery and radiation while minimizing morbidity.


Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Cryosurgery/methods , Humans , Male , Prostatectomy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Interventional
7.
J Urol ; 175(4): 1230-3; discussion 1234, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16515966

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We designed a prospective, randomized clinical trial to compare 3 common approaches to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, namely transperitoneal, retroperitoneal and hand assisted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 33 patients with a solid renal mass of 7 cm or less were prospectively enrolled in alternating fashion to a hand assisted procedure, a transperitoneal procedure with morcellation and a retroperitoneal procedure with intact specimen extraction. A single surgeon performed all operations. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative criteria were compared among the 3 techniques. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients underwent each type of procedure. There was no significant difference in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, body mass index or tumor size among the groups. Mean operative time was significantly lower using the hand assisted approach, whereas estimated blood loss was similar in all 3 groups. Incision size, hospital stay and time to normal daily activity were less using the transperitoneal approach. While not significant, there was a trend toward less narcotic use in the transperitoneal group. Hernia formation was seen with increased frequency in the hand assisted group. CONCLUSIONS: In our series the hand assisted approach had significantly shorter operative time than the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach but it had the greatest risk of hernia formation. The transperitoneal approach was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and the earliest resumption of normal activity.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy , Nephrectomy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Peritoneum , Prospective Studies
8.
Urology ; 67(1): 89-92, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16413339

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with a novel flexible cystoscopic approach to excise the en block bladder cuff and juxtavesical ureter during hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. The optimal technique for excising the distal ureter and bladder cuff during nephroureterectomy continues to evolve. METHODS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy was performed in 6 patients. A hand-assist device and two 5 to 12-mm ports were placed in the mid and upper abdomen. Two 10-mm clips were placed on the proximal ureter to occlude it, and the kidney was resected in the usual fashion. An additional 5 to 12-mm port was placed in the midline between the umbilicus and symphysis pubis. The ureter was dissected down into the pelvis to the level of the bladder. Without repositioning the patient, a flexible cystoscope was inserted into the bladder and a 2-cm bladder cuff excised using a 5F electrode on cutting current, with coagulating current used as needed. The specimen was removed intact through the hand port. RESULTS: The mean time to resect the distal bladder cuff was 30 minutes (range 22 to 35). The mean estimated blood loss was 254 mL. The mean operating room time was 264 minutes, mean hospital stay 6.3 days, and mean time to a general diet 2.6 days. All patients underwent cystography at 7 to 10 days postoperatively, with no extravasation or diverticula. Cystoscopic and computed tomography follow-up demonstrated no evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This technique allows for complete resection of the kidney, distal ureter, and a cuff of bladder, avoiding repositioning.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery , Cystoscopy , Hydronephrosis/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Ureter/surgery , Ureteral Diseases/surgery , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...