Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 36(1): 164-169, 2023 02 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36460347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary care level close monitoring of mild COVID-19 patients has shown to provide a risk reduction in hospitalization and death. We aimed to compare the risk of all-cause death among COVID-19 ambulatory patients who received and did not receive telephonic follow-up in primary health care settings. METHODS: A secondary database analysis, 2-group comparative study, was conducted with data from the medical information systems of the Mexican Institute of Social Security. A total of 1,498,808 ambulatory patients aged 20 years old and over and with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 by PCR or rapid antigen test were analyzed. Of them, 535,898 (35.8%) where followed by telephonic calls. The cases were attended from October 14, 2020, to April 10, 2022. Death incidence was evaluated. To assess the association between death and telephonic follow-up we calculated risk ratio using a multivariate logistic model. RESULTS: Case fatality rate was 1.29% in the patients who received telephonic follow-up and 2.95% in the cases who did not receive phone calls. Medical history of chronic kidney disease, COPD, cardiovascular disease, tobacco consumption and diabetes were associated with increased risk of death. In the multivariate model, telephonic follow-up was associated with lower risk of all-cause death, with an adjusted risk ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval from 0.59, 0.64). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that telephonic follow-up is associated with a risk of death reduction in adult outpatients with mild COVID-19, in the context of a multimodal strategy in the primary health care settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Young Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization , Time Factors
2.
Arch Med Res ; 53(3): 323-328, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35123809

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Different interventions have been implemented worldwide for the house-hold monitoring of patients with mild COVID-19 to reduce the burden of healthcare systems and guarantee quality of care. Telephone follow up and treatment kits have not been evaluated in the context of a national-wide primary care program. AIM OF THE STUDY: To compare the risk of hospitalization and death for COVID-19 between ambulatory patients who received and those who did not receive a treatment kit and telephone follow-up in a developing country METHODS: A two-group comparative analysis was conducted using data from the medical information systems of the Mexican Institute of Social Security. We included a total of 28,048 laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients: 7,898 (28.2%) received a medical kit and 20,150 (71.8%) did not. The incidence rates of hospitalization and death combined were calculated. To identify significant associations between hospitalization or death and treatment medical kits, we calculated the risk ratios using a multivariate logistic model. RESULTS: The incidence of hospitalization was 6.14% in patients who received a kit and 11.71% in those who did not. Male sex, age, and a medical history of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, immunosuppression, or kidney disease were associated with increased risk of hospitalization or death. The risk rates were reduced in patients who received a medical kit or telephone follow-up. In the multivariate model, receiving a medical kit was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization or death from COVID-19: adjusted risk ratio 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.36-0.47). CONCLUSION: Use of a multimodal strategy may reduce the risk of hospitalization and death in adult outpatients with mild COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kidney Diseases , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Male , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 60(Suppl 2): 103-109, 2022 Dec 19.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36796023

ABSTRACT

In diabetes, obtaining optimal control is key to reducing chronic complications. Unfortunately, not all patients achieve the recommended goals. Therefore, the challenges to develop and evaluate comprehensive care models are enormous. In October 2008, the Diabetic Patient Care Program (DiabetIMSS) was designed and implemented in family medicine. Its principal component is the multidisciplinary team (doctor, nurse, psychologist, dietitian, dentist, and social worker) that offers coordinated health care; monthly medical consultation and individual, family and group education on self-care and prevention of complications for 12 months. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the percentage of attendance at the DiabetIMSS modules decreased significantly. This is how the Medical Director considered it necessary to strengthen them, and the Diabetes Care Centers (CADIMSS) arose. In addition to providing medical care with a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, the CADIMSS encourages the co-responsibility of the patient and his family. It consists of monthly medical consultation and nursing staff provides monthly educational sessions for 6 months. Pending tasks remain and there are still areas of opportunity to modernize and reorganize services that contribute to improving the health of the population with diabetes.


En un paciente con diabetes, la obtención de un control óptimo es clave para reducir las complicaciones crónicas. Desafortunadamente, no todos los pacientes logran las metas recomendadas. Por ello, son substanciales los desafíos para desarrollar y evaluar modelos de atención integral. En octubre del 2008, se diseñó e implementó el Programa de Atención al Paciente Diabético (DiabetIMSS) en medicina familiar. Su componente básico es el equipo multidisciplinario (médico, enfermera, psicólogo, dietista, dentista y trabajador social) que ofrece asistencia sanitaria coordinada, consulta médica mensual y educación individual, familiar y grupal sobre autocuidado y prevención de complicaciones durante 12 meses. Debido a la pandemia de COVID-19, el porcentaje de asistencia a los módulos DiabetIMSS disminuyó importantemente. Es así como la Dirección de Prestaciones Médicas consideró necesario su fortalecimiento, por lo que surgen los Centros de Atención a la Diabetes (CADIMSS). Además de proporcionar atención médico-asistencial con enfoque integral y multidisciplinario, en los CADIMSS se fomenta la corresponsabilidad del paciente y su familia, y se otorga consulta médica mensual y sesiones educativas a cargo de personal de enfermería durante 6 meses. Sin embargo, siguen tareas pendientes, y aún hay áreas de oportunidad para modernizar y reorganizar los servicios que contribuyan a mejorar la salud de la población con diabetes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Pandemics , Self Care , Family Practice
4.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 60(Suppl 2): 134-141, 2022 Dec 19.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36796084

ABSTRACT

Twenty years after its launch, the most ambitious preventive program implemented at the institutional level in Mexico called PREVENIMSS focuses on new challenges and moves towards relaunching. This paper reviews the foundations and design of PREVENIMSS and its evolution throughout these two decades. The PREVENIMS coverage assessment through national surveys set a relevant precedent in evaluating programs at the Mexican Institute of Social Security. PREVENIMSS has shown progress in preventing vaccine-preventable diseases. However, given the current epidemiological profile, there is still a need to provide more effective primary and secondary prevention of chronic noncommunicable diseases. New digital resources and orientation of PREVENIMSS towards a more comprehensive approach that contemplates secondary prevention and rehabilitation can help to face the growing challenges that the program still faces.


A 20 años de su lanzamiento, el programa preventivo más ambicioso implementado a nivel institucional en México llamado PREVENIMSS se enfoca en nuevos desafíos y avanza hacia el relanzamiento. Este artículo hace un breve recorrido de sus fundamentos, diseño y evolución a lo largo de estas dos décadas. La estimación de las coberturas de PREVENIMSS a través de encuestas nacionales también marcó un precedente en la evaluación de programas en el Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. PREVENIMSS ha mostrado avances en prevención de enfermedades prevenibles por vacunación, pero aún existe la necesidad de brindar prevención primaria y secundaria más efectivos de las enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles ante el perfil epidemiológico actual. Nuevos recursos digitales y la orientación hacia un enfoque más integral que contemple la prevención secundaria y la rehabilitación pueden ayudar a enfrentar los crecientes desafíos que aún enfrenta el programa.


Subject(s)
Medicine , Preventive Health Services , Humans , Mexico , Social Security
5.
Gac Med Mex ; 155(1): 30-38, 2019.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30799453

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The prevalence of chronic complications and comorbidities in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has increased worldwide. Objective: To compare the prevalence of complications and chronic comorbidities in patients with T2D at 36 family medicine units of five chapters of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS). Method: Complications (hypoglycemia, diabetic foot, kidney disease, retinopathy, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and heart failure) and comorbidities (liver disease, cancer and anemia) were identified according to codes of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Comparisons were made by chapter, age, gender and evolution time. Results: Complications and comorbidities were more common in subjects aged ≥ 62 years. Out of 297 100 patients, 34.9 % had any complication; microvascular complications (32 %) prevailed in the industrial North, whereas macrovascular complications (12.3 %) did in the rural East, and comorbidities (5 %) in southern Mexico City. Complications predominated in men (any complication, 30.2 %). Heart failure and comorbidities were more common in women (5.6 % and 4.9 %, respectively). Conclusions: T2D complications and comorbidities showed geographic and gender differences, and were greater with older age and longer evolution time. It is urgent for strategies for the prevention of complications and comorbidities to be reinforced in patients with T2D.


Introducción: La prevalencia de complicaciones crónicas y comorbilidades en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 (DT2) se han incrementado en el mundo. Objetivo: Comparar la prevalencia de complicaciones y comorbilidades crónicas en pacientes con DT2 en 36 unidades de medicina familiar de cinco delegaciones del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS). Métodos: Conforme los códigos de la Décima Revisión de la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades se identificaron las complicaciones (hipoglucemia, pie diabético, enfermedad renal, retinopatía, enfermedad cardiaca isquémica, enfermedad cerebrovascular y falla cardiaca) y comorbilidades (enfermedad hepática, cáncer, anemia) de DT2. Se compararon por delegación, edad, sexo y tiempo de evolución. Resultados: Las complicaciones y comorbilidades fueron más comunes en personas ≥ 62 años. De 297 100 pacientes, 34.9 % presentó cualquier complicación; microvasculares en el norte industrial (32 %), macrovasculares en el este rural (12.3 %) y comorbilidades (5 %) en el sur de la Ciudad de México; estas complicaciones predominaron en los hombres (cualquier complicación 30.2 %). La falla cardiaca y las comorbilidades fueron más comunes en mujeres (5.6 y 4.9 %). Conclusiones: Las complicaciones y comorbilidades de DT2 mostraron diferencias geográficas y de sexo y fueron mayores con la edad y el tiempo de evolución. Urge reforzar estrategias para la prevención de las complicaciones y comorbilidades en los pacientes con DT2.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Diabetes Complications/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Liver Diseases/epidemiology , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
6.
Gac. méd. Méx ; 155(1): 30-38, Jan.-Feb. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1286456

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción: La prevalencia de complicaciones crónicas y comorbilidades en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 (DT2) se han incrementado en el mundo. Objetivo: Comparar la prevalencia de complicaciones y comorbilidades crónicas en pacientes con DT2 en 36 unidades de medicina familiar de cinco delegaciones del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS). Métodos: Conforme los códigos de la Décima Revisión de la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades se identificaron las complicaciones (hipoglucemia, pie diabético, enfermedad renal, retinopatía, enfermedad cardiaca isquémica, enfermedad cerebrovascular y falla cardiaca) y comorbilidades (enfermedad hepática, cáncer, anemia) de DT2. Se compararon por delegación, edad, sexo y tiempo de evolución. Resultados: Las complicaciones y comorbilidades fueron más comunes en personas ≥ 62 años. De 297 100 pacientes, 34.9 % presentó cualquier complicación; microvasculares en el norte industrial (32 %), macrovasculares en el este rural (12.3 %) y comorbilidades (5 %) en el sur de la Ciudad de México; estas complicaciones predominaron en los hombres (cualquier complicación 30.2 %). La falla cardiaca y las comorbilidades fueron más comunes en mujeres (5.6 y 4.9 %). Conclusiones: Las complicaciones y comorbilidades de DT2 mostraron diferencias geográficas y de sexo y fueron mayores con la edad y el tiempo de evolución. Urge reforzar estrategias para la prevención de las complicaciones y comorbilidades en los pacientes con DT2.


Abstract Introduction: The prevalence of chronic complications and comorbidities in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has increased worldwide. Objective: To compare the prevalence of complications and chronic comorbidities in patients with T2D at 36 family medicine units of five chapters of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS). Method: Complications (hypoglycemia, diabetic foot, kidney disease, retinopathy, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and heart failure) and comorbidities (liver disease, cancer and anemia) were identified according to codes of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Comparisons were made by chapter, age, gender and evolution time. Results: Complications and comorbidities were more common in subjects aged ≥ 62 years. Out of 297 100 patients, 34.9 % had any complication; microvascular complications (32 %) prevailed in the industrial North, whereas macrovascular complications (12.3 %) did in the rural East, and comorbidities (5 %) in southern Mexico City. Complications predominated in men (any complication, 30.2 %). Heart failure and comorbidities were more common in women (5.6 % and 4.9 %, respectively). Conclusions: T2D complications and comorbidities showed geographic and gender differences, and were greater with older age and longer evolution time. It is urgent for strategies for the prevention of complications and comorbidities to be reinforced in patients with T2D.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Comorbidity , Sex Factors , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Age Factors , Diabetes Complications/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Anemia/epidemiology , Liver Diseases/epidemiology , Mexico/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology
7.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 11(3): 297-304, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28343902

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Describe stepwise strategies (electronic chart review, patient preselection, call-center, personnel dedicated to recruitment) for the successful recruitment of >5000 type 2 diabetes patients in four months. METHODS: Twenty-five family medicine clinics from Mexico City and the State of Mexico participated: 13 usual care, 6 specialized diabetes care and 6 chronic disease care. Appointments were scheduled from 11/3/2015 to 3/31/2016. Phone calls were generated automatically from an electronic database. A telephone questionnaire verified inclusion criteria, and scheduled an appointment, with a daily report of appointments, patient attendance, acceptance rate, and questionnaire completeness. Another recruitment log reviewed samples collected. Absolute number (percentage) of patients are reported. Means and standard deviations were estimated for continuous variables, χ2 test and independent "t" tests were used. OR and 95% CI were estimated. RESULTS: 14,358 appointments were scheduled, 9146 (63.7%) attended their appointment: 5710 (62.4%) fulfilled inclusion criteria and 5244 agreed to participate (91.8% acceptance). Those accepting participation were more likely women, younger and with longer disease duration (p<0.05). The cost of the call-center service was $3,010,000.00 Mexican pesos (∼$31.70 USD per recruited patient). CONCLUSIONS: Stepwise strategies recruit a high number of patients in a short time. Call centers offer a low cost per patient.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Patient Selection , Research Subjects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Appointments and Schedules , Call Centers , Chi-Square Distribution , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Electronic Health Records , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , No-Show Patients , Odds Ratio , Patient Participation , Prospective Studies , Research Subjects/psychology , Sample Size , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telephone , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...