Molecular mechanism for agonist-promoted alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor activation by norepinephrine and epinephrine.

We present a mechanism for agonist-promoted alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2A)-AR) activation based on structural, pharmacological, and theoretical evidence of the interactions between phenethylamine ligands and alpha(2A)-AR. In this study, we have: 1) isolated enantiomerically pure phenethylamines that differ both in their chirality about the beta-carbon, and in the presence/absence of one or more hydroxyl groups: the beta-OH and the catecholic meta- and para-OH groups; 2) used [(3)H]UK-14,304 [5-bromo-N-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-6-quinoxalinamine; agonist] and [(3)H]RX821002 [2-(2-methoxy-1,4-benzodioxan-2-yl)-2-imidazoline; antagonist] competition binding assays to determine binding affinities of these ligands to the high- and low-affinity forms of alpha(2A)-AR; 3) tested the ability of the ligands to promote receptor activation by measuring agonist-induced stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in isolated cell membranes; and 4) used automated docking methods and our alpha(2A)-AR model to predict the binding modes of the ligands inside the alpha(2A)-AR binding site. The ligand molecules are sequentially missing different functional groups, and we have correlated the structural features of the ligands and ligand-receptor interactions with experimental ligand binding and receptor activation data. Based on the analysis, we show that structural rearrangements in transmembrane helix (TM) 5 could take place upon binding and subsequent activation of alpha(2A)-AR by phenethylamine agonists. We suggest that the following residues are important in phenethylamine interactions with alpha(2A)-AR: Asp113 (D(3.32)), Val114 (V(3.33)), and Thr118 (T(3.37)) in TM3; Ser200 (S(5.42)), Cys201 (C(5.43)), and Ser204 (S(5.46)) in TM5; Phe391 (F(6.52)) and Tyr394 (Y(6.55)) in TM6; and Phe411 (F(7.38)) and Phe412 (F(7.39)) in TM7.

Three-dimensional models of alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor complexes provide a structural explanation for ligand binding.

We have compared bacteriorhodopsin-based (alpha(2A)-AR(BR)) and rhodopsin-based (alpha(2A)-AR(R)) models of the human alpha(2A)-adrenengic receptor (alpha(2A)-AR) using both docking simulations and experimental receptor alkylation studies with chloroethylclonidine and 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate hydrobromide. The results indicate that the alpha(2A)-AR(R) model provides a better explanation for ligand binding than does our alpha(2A)-AR(BR) model. Thus, we have made an extensive analysis of ligand binding to alpha(2A)-AR(R) and engineered mutant receptors using clonidine, para-aminoclonidine, oxymetazoline, 5-bromo-N-(4, 5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-6-quinoxalinamine (UK14,304), and norepinephrine as ligands. The representative docked ligand conformation was chosen using extensive docking simulations coupled with the identification of favorable interaction sites for chemical groups in the receptor. These ligand-protein complex studies provide a rational explanation at the atomic level for the experimentally observed binding affinities of each of these ligands to the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor.