Electroanatomical mapping improves procedural outcomes of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (the Achieve Plus study).

BACKGROUND: Validation of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) using only the Achieve catheter following cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is imperfect since pulmonary vein potentials (PVP) can be recorded in only 50-85% of the veins and residual PVP are found in up to 4.3-7.6% of the isolated veins in remapping studies. OBJECTIVE: To study if addition of electroanatomical mapping to Achieve catheter-guided CBA is superior for PVI. METHODS: One hundred patients were randomized between Achieve catheter-guided CBA (control group; N = 50) and Achieve catheter-guided CBA with additional EnSite voltage maps performed pre- and post-CBA (Achieve Plus group; N = 50). Confirmation of PVI was done by circular mapping catheter (CMC) and EnSite mapping by a second blinded operator. RESULTS: Despite apparent PVI in all PVs after CBA, incomplete PVI was present in 0 out of 50 patients (0%) and 0 out of 204 PVs in the Achieve Plus group versus 6 patients out of 50 (12%; P = 0.012) and 6 out of 203 PVs (3%; P = 0.013) in the control group. All 6 non-isolated PVs could be successfully isolated by additional cryoapplications. Procedure time was longer in the Achieve Plus group (75.76 ± 21.65 vs 66.06 ± 16.83 min; P = 0.014) with equal fluoroscopy times (14.85 ± 6.41 vs 14.33 ± 8.55; P = 0.732). CONCLUSION: The addition of electroanatomical EnSite mapping to the Achieve catheter improves the PVI rate of CBA and could be considered for future use. Design and Results of the Achieve Plus study. The Achieve Plus study shows that the addition of electro-anatomical EnSite mapping to the Achieve catheter improves PVI rate of CBA and could be considered for future use. See text for further explanation. ABBREVIATIONS: CBA: cryoballoon ablation; PVI: pulmonary vein isolation.

Nationwide but still inhomogeneous distribution of certified chest pain units across Germany : Need to strengthen rural regions.

AIM: The purpose of this work was to analyze structure, distribution, and bed capacities of certified German chest pain units (CPUs) to unveil potential gaps despite nationwide certification of 230 units till the end of 2015. METHODS: Analysis of number and structure of CPUs per state, resident count, and population density by standardized telephone interview, online research, and data collection from the registry of the Federal Statistical Office for all certified German CPUs. RESULTS: Nationwide, German health facilities provided a mean of 1 CPU bed within a certified unit per 65,000 inhabitants. Bremen, Hamburg, Hesse, and Rhineland-Palatinate provided more than 1 bed per 50,000 inhabitants. Most CPUs (49%) were located in the emergency room. All university hospitals in Germany provided a certified CPU. Most units were found in academic teaching hospitals (146 CPUs). Only 42 CPUs were found in nonacademic providers of primary health care. CONCLUSION: The absolute necessary number of CPUs to reach full nationwide coverage is still unknown. The current analysis shows a high number of CPUs and bed capacities within the cities and industrial areas without relevant gaps, but also demonstrates a certain undersupply in more rural areas as well as in some of the former eastern federal states of Germany.