Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurosci ; 42(49): 9211-9226, 2022 12 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36280263

ABSTRACT

Social information is some of the most ambiguous content we encounter in our daily lives, yet in experimental contexts, percepts of social interactions-that is, whether an interaction is present and if so, the nature of that interaction-are often dichotomized as correct or incorrect based on experimenter-assigned labels. Here, we investigated the behavioral and neural correlates of subjective (or conscious) social perception using data from the Human Connectome Project in which participants (n = 1049; 486 men, 562 women) viewed animations of geometric shapes during fMRI and indicated whether they perceived a social interaction or random motion. Critically, rather than experimenter-assigned labels, we used observers' own reports of "Social" or "Non-social" to classify percepts and characterize brain activity, including leveraging a particularly ambiguous animation perceived as "Social" by some but "Non-social" by others to control for visual input. Behaviorally, observers were biased toward perceiving information as social (vs non-social); and neurally, observer reports (compared with experimenter labels) explained more variance in activity across much of the brain. Using "Unsure" reports, we identified several regions that responded parametrically to perceived socialness. Neural responses to social versus non-social content diverged early in time and in the cortical hierarchy. Finally, individuals with higher internalizing trait scores showed both a higher response bias toward "Social" and an inverse relationship with activity in default mode and visual association areas while scanning for social information. Findings underscore the subjective nature of social perception and the importance of using observer reports to study percepts of social interactions.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Simple animations involving two or more geometric shapes have been used as a gold standard to understand social cognition and impairments therein. Yet, experimenter-assigned labels of what is social versus non-social are frequently used as a ground truth, despite the fact that percepts of such ambiguous social stimuli are highly subjective. Here, we used behavioral and fMRI data from a large sample of neurotypical individuals to show that participants' responses reveal subtle behavioral biases, help us study neural responses to social content more precisely, and covary with internalizing trait scores. Our findings underscore the subjective nature of social perception and the importance of considering observer reports in studying behavioral and neural dynamics of social perception.


Subject(s)
Motion Perception , Social Interaction , Male , Humans , Female , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiology , Consciousness , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Perception , Social Perception , Visual Perception/physiology , Motion Perception/physiology
2.
Neuroimage ; 214: 116701, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32135261

ABSTRACT

It is well-established that increased sensory uncertainty impairs perceptual decision-making and leads to degraded neural stimulus representations. Recently, we also showed that providing unreliable feedback to choices leads to changes in perceptual decision-making similar to those of increased stimulus noise: A deterioration in objective task performance, a decrease in subjective confidence and a lower reliance on sensory information for perceptual inference. To investigate the neural basis of such feedback-based changes in perceptual decision-making, in the present study, two groups of healthy human participants (n = 15 each) performed a challenging visual orientation discrimination task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Critically, one group received reliable feedback regarding their task performance in an intervention phase, whereas the other group correspondingly received unreliable feedback - thereby keeping stimulus information constant. The effects of feedback reliability on performance and stimulus representation in the primary visual cortex (V1) were studied by comparing the pre- and post-intervention test phases between the groups. Compared to participants who received reliable feedback, those receiving unreliable feedback showed a decline in task performance that was paralleled by reduced distinctness of fMRI response patterns in V1. These results show that environmental uncertainty can affect perceptual inference at the earliest cortical processing stages.


Subject(s)
Decision Making/physiology , Formative Feedback , Visual Cortex/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Brain Mapping/methods , Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Feedback , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL