Second-line pazopanib in patients with relapsed and refractory small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Pazopanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression is increased in SCLC and is correlated with poor prognosis. The efficacy and tolerance of second-line pazopanib in SCLC was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with platinum-sensitive (cohort A; n=39) and -resistant/refractory (cohort B; n=19) SCLC were enrolled in a multicentre phase II study. The primary end point was the progression-free survival rate (PFS-R) at week 8 in each cohort. Pazopanib (800 mg per day per os) was administered until progressive disease (PD). Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) were enumerated using the Cellsearch assay. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. In the intention-to-treat analysis, eight (13.8%) patients achieved partial response (PR) (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0-22.7), 20 (34.5%) stable disease (SD) and 30 (51.7%) PD. Accrual in cohort B was halted because the hard-stop rule was met; in cohort A, the PFS-R was 59% (95% CI: 43.5-74.4; PR=7, SD=16). Nine (23.1%) patients received pazopanib for >6 months and 3 of them for >12 months. One pazopanib cycle resulted to a significant decrease to the number of patients with ⩾5 CTCs/7.5 ml of blood (20%) compared with baseline (50%). The median PFS and OS for all patients was 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.9-3.1 months) and 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.8-8.2 months), respectively (cohort A: PFS=3.7 months and OS=8.0 months). No unexpected toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line treatment with pazopanib in platinum-sensitive SCLC is well tolerated and resulted in promising objective responses and disease control; CTC enumeration might serve as a reliable surrogate biomarker of response.

A multicentre phase II trial of cabazitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer progressing after docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel, a semisynthetic microtubule inhibitor, has shown antitumour activity in models resistant to paclitaxel and docetaxel, and it has been approved for the treatment of docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer. We investigated its activity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing under or after docetaxel-based regimens. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic NSCLC, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, were enrolled; patients had to have received up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced disease, including one docetaxel-containing regimen. Treatment consisted of cabazitaxel (25 mg m(-2) intravenously, every 21 days) until disease progression. The primary end point was the overall response rate. RESULTS: Among the 46 evaluable patients, 28.3% had squamous cell carcinoma and 54.3% had adenocarcinoma. Eight (17.4%) patients had received one and 38 (82.6%) two prior chemotherapy regimens. Treatment compliance was 95%; 26 (16%) cycles were delayed because of toxicity, (n=13) and dose reduction was required in 6 (13%) patients because of haematologic toxicity. Six (13%) patients achieved a partial response and 17 (37.0%) stable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-3.2) and 7.4 (95% CI: 5.2-9.6) months, respectively. Grade 4 adverse events included neutropenia (n=8; 17%), febrile neutropenia (n=6; 13%) and thrombocytopenia (n=3; 6.5%). There was one treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Cabazitaxel exhibits activity in NSCLC patients pre-treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy with a substantial but manageable toxicity profile. The drug merits further evaluation in this indication.

A multicenter randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet versus capecitabine monotherapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Breast Cancer Study Group of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group conducted a phase III trial of single-agent capecitabine versus the vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of combination treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with MBC were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine (Cap arm: 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, on days 1-14) or vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet (VG arm: vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2); both drugs on days 1 and 15). RESULTS: Seventy-four women were treated on each arm and median PFS was 5.4 versus 5.2 months (P = 0.736), for VG and Cap, respectively. Median overall survival was 20.4 months for the VG arm and 22.4 months for the Cap arm (P = 0.319). Overall response rate was 28.4% in the VG arm and 24.3% in the Cap arm (P = 0.576). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. Neutropenia and fatigue were more common with VG arm and hand-foot syndrome with Cap arm. CONCLUSIONS: This trial failed to demonstrate superiority of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet over single-agent capecitabine in terms of PFS. Given the favorable toxicity and convenience of oral administration, single-agent capecitabine is recommended for compliant patients.

Vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms and clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the association of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genotypes with treatment efficacy in a randomized trial. This study compared two chemotherapy regimens (FOLFIRI versus XELIRI) combined with bevacizumab, as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. DNA was extracted from blood samples of 173 patients participating in the trial. Genotyping was performed for selected SNPs (VEGF-1154, +936, -634, -2578 and -1498). All candidate genotypes were evaluated for associations with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). There were no significant differences with respect to the distribution of genotypes in the treatment groups. The VEGF-1154 GG genotype was more frequent in patients not responding to treatment compared with responders (65.5 versus 39.8%, P = 0.032). Furthermore, the VEGF-1154 GG genotype was associated with inferior median OS compared with GA (hazards ratio = 1.68; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.57; P = 0.016) or with the alternative genotypes (GA and AA) combined (hazards ratio = 1.62; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-2.40; P = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, the VEGF-1154 GG genotype remained a significant adverse factor for OS. Our results support the potential predictive ability of VEGF genotypes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving irinotecan-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, in terms of RR and OS. However, current results should be validated prospectively, in larger cohorts.

Modified CAPOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) regimen every two weeks as second-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with irinotecan-based frontline therapy: a multicenter phase II study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of capecitabine (CAP) given every other week and biweekly oxaliplatin (OX; modified CAPOX regimen) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with irinote- can-based frontline chemotherapy. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled; the median age was 62 years and 62 (92.5%) had a performance status (ECOG) of 0-1. OX and CAP were administered at the dose of 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 2,000 mg/m(2) on days 1-7, respectively, every 2 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 429 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 4 (6%) and 2 (3%) patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia complicated 1 treatment cycle. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 peripheral sensory neurotoxicity (10% of patients) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (7%). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 3 (4.5%) complete and 13 (19.4%) partial responses (overall response rate 24%) were observed. Seventeen (24.5%) patients had stable and 27 (40.3%) progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression and overall survival were 5 months and 11.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the modified CAPOX regimen is safe and effective as salvage treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who were previously treated with irinotecan-based frontline therapy.

Multicenter phase-II trial of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin [IROX regimen] in patients with poor-prognosis cancer of unknown primary: a hellenic cooperative oncology group study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) lacks established therapy although it affects 3% of cancer patients. We evaluated the irinotecan-oxaliplatin combination (IROX regimen) in previously untreated patients with non-favorable subsets of unknown primary carcinomas. METHODS: This was a multicenter phase-II trial. Protocol treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 80 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 160 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks. The primary end points were response rate and toxicity, and secondary end points were time to progression and survival. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with liver, bone or multiple visceral metastases entered into the trial and received a median 6 chemotherapy cycles (1-11). The regimen was very well tolerated with one febrile neutropenia case and six cases with diarrhea grade 3 (16%). In intent-to-treat analysis the tumor response rate was 13% (95% CI = 4.8-25.7%) and 12 patients (27%, 95%CI 13.9-40.4%) had at least 4 months' duration of disease stabilization. The median time to progression was 2.7 months and the median survival was 9.5 months, with 40% of patients alive at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The IROX regimen demonstrated similar efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile compared to other more toxic chemotherapy combinations in patients with poor-prognosis CUP.

Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF in patients with high-risk breast cancer: safety analysis of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized phase III trial HE 10/00.

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase III trial in high-risk breast cancer patients was conducted, to further explore the impact of dose-density in the adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. The safety analysis is presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2000 until June 2005, 1121 node-positive patients were randomized to sequential dose-dense epirubicin 110 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel (Taxol, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA) 250 mg/m(2) (group A), or concurrent epirubicin 83 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 187 mg/m(2) (group B), both followed by three cycles of 'intensified' combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given prophylactically with the dose-dense treatments. RESULTS: Median dose intensity of epirubicin and paclitaxel was double in group A, as designed, with significantly less cycles administered at full dose (P < 0.001). Median cumulative dose of all drugs and total treatment duration, however, were identical between groups. Severe taxane-related toxic effects were more frequent in group A, while severe thrombocytopenia was low and present only in group A. There were no differences in the rates of other hematological toxic effects, including febrile neutropenia. The rates of secondary malignancies were low. CONCLUSION: Both regimens as used in the present study are well tolerated and safe. The rates of severe taxane-related toxic effects and thrombocytopenia, although low overall, are significantly increased with the dose-dense sequential regimen.

Multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) as second-line chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients pretreated with 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the gemcitabine/oxaliplatin (GEMOX) combination as second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) pretreated with an irinotecan (CPT-11)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with documented disease progression during or after first-line treatment with CPT-11 and 5-FU/LV were enrolled. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2) day 1) were administered every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Partial responses were observed in 6 of the 34 (17.7%) patients enrolled (intention-to-treat analysis; overall response rate: 17.7%; 95% confidence interval 4.8-30.5%). Eight (23.5%) patients experienced disease stabilization and 20 (59%) disease progression (tumor growth control rate = 41.2%). The median duration of response was 5.5 months, and the median time to tumor progression 2.7 months. The median overall survival was 9.1 months (1-year survival rate: 44.0%). Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 and 15% of the patients, respectively. Other severe non-hematologic toxicities were rare. CONCLUSION: The interesting tumor growth control rate and the favorable toxicity profile of the GEMOX regimen in pretreated patients with advanced CRC strongly suggest that this regimen may provide an alternative therapeutic option for this group of patients.

Front-line chemotherapy with docetaxel and gemcitabine administered every two weeks in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the docetaxel-gemcitabine combination administered every 2 weeks in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Fifty-two patients with MBC received docetaxel 65 mg/m2 as front-line chemotherapy intravenously over 1 h followed by gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 min on days 1 and 14. Cycles were repeated every 28 days without prophylactic growth factor support. Twenty-eight (54%) patients had previously received chemotherapy as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment. Thirty-six (69%) patients had visceral disease including 20 (38%) with liver metastases. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and 45 for response. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, a complete response occurred in 7 (13%) patients and partial response in 24 (46%) for an overall response rate of 59% (95% CI: 46.3-73.0%). The response rate was 68% for the 28 patients who had previously received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 67% for the 36 patients with visceral metastases. The median duration of response was 6.1 months and the median time to disease progression 10.9 months. A total of 254 cycles were administered with dose reduction in 26 (10%) cycles and no lethal toxicity. Grade III-IV neutropenia occurred in 17 (33%) patients and thrombocytopenia in 3 (6%). Febrile neutropenia developed in 3 (6%) patients. Nonhematological toxicity was generally mild. CONCLUSION: The docetaxel-gemcitabine combination is an active and well-tolerated front-line treatment for patients with MBC. This regimen represents a suitable option especially for women relapsing after anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

A prospective, randomized study of pefloxacin versus teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive coccal infections in cancer patients: early termination due to emergence of resistance to fluoroquinolones.

A randomized prospective study comparing pefloxacin to teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive infections in cancer patients was prematurely terminated because of the emergence of pefloxacin resistance associated with oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Among 56 patients evaluated for efficacy (26 pefloxacin and 30 teicoplanin) and infected with bacteria susceptible to both antibiotics, the clinical cure and eradication rates were similar for pefloxacin (80.5% and 77.3% respectively) and teicoplanin (66.6% and 52.2% respectively). The relapse rates (15% and 10% for pefloxacin and teicoplanin respectively) and the overall mortalities within 1 month (42% and 31%) were similar.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with dacarbazine, vindesine, and cisplatin in pathological stage II malignant melanoma.

Following curative lymph node dissection, 28 patients with pathological Stage II malignant melanoma (metastatic to regional lymph nodes) received adjuvant chemotherapy with dacarbazine, vindesine, and cisplatin (DVP); 32 more patients with similar characteristics refused adjuvant treatment. In the treated group, 15 patients (53%) developed dissemination of disease after 4 to 29 months; 20 (62%) of the patients who refused adjuvant treatment recurred after 4 to 25 months and received palliative treatment with DVP. No significant differences in survival or disease-free survival according to different patient characteristics could be detected between these two groups with the available patient population. Large and well-designed prospective randomized trials are required to determine if the adjuvant use of this treatment schedule, which includes the three most active drugs improves survival in patients with nondisseminated melanoma.

Treatment of primary fallopian tube carcinoma with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

Because of the rarity of the primary fallopian tube carcinoma, optimal primary therapy is still not well defined, and there is little information available regarding the efficacy of combination chemotherapy in advanced disease. The experience obtained by treating 14 patients with fallopian tube carcinoma--most of them with advanced disease--using a combination of cisplatin, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (CAP) (10 patients) or carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide (4 patients) is reported. One patient had Stage Ic disease, 2 had Stage II, 9 had Stage III, and 2 had Stage IV. Eleven patients had clinically measurable disease (> 2 cm) at the start of chemotherapy. Eight of these patients had a complete clinical response (CR), 2 had partial response (PR), and 1 had progressive disease (PD). Of the 8 CR patients, 5 underwent second-look operation (SLO). Pathological complete response (pCR) confirmed in 4 out of 5 patients at SLO. The 3 patients without measurable disease (< 2 cm) after primary surgery had an indeterminate response to chemotherapy. Two of them (Stages Ic and II, respectively) had a negative SLO, while the third patient with Stage IV disease, who refused the SLO, remains disease-free 41+ months. This high response rate shows that this carcinoma is very responsive to cisplatin- or cisplatin analogue-containing regimens. One pCR and two clinical CR patients relapsed after 20, 14, and 16 months, respectively, from the completion of chemotherapy and died despite the second-line treatment. The toxicity of the regimens was moderate. The median survival was 40 months, and the actuarial 5-year survival rate was 48%. Carcinoma of the fallopian tube appears to respond favorably to cisplatin- or carboplatin-containing chemotherapy.

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in cancer patients.

Concern has been arisen about the recently reported increasing incidence of PCP in patients with cancer and the potential transmissibility of this infection. Whether or not there is an increase in the incidence of P. carinii infections, PCP should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates in bone marrow transplant recipients, in patients with hematologic neoplasms and in patients with primary or metastatic brain neoplasms. Intensity of immunosuppression plays a crucial role, especially long-term (> 2 months) corticosteroid treatment. PCP is usually manifested clinically during augmentation or during tapering of corticosteroid dose. Thus, if the chest radiograph of a high-risk patient shows diffuse infiltrates, bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage should be done immediately. Treatment options are the same as for the AIDS population, except that TMP-SMX is tolerated better in non-AIDS patients. The role of supportive care, including mechanical ventilation in such patients should not be underestimated. Oral therapy with dapsone-trimethoprim or with atovaquone, can be as effective as conventional therapy in mild disease, permitting treatment on an outpatient basis. PCP is often preventable and our understanding has improved about when prophylaxis should be initiated. In the future, the emergence of new technologies for diagnosis and of new agents for treatment and prophylaxis, will bring us closer to the goal of controlling this serious infection.

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with cancer. An increasing incidence.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) is increasing in patients with cancer. Possible nosocomial transmission from patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome to those with cancer has been advocated. METHODS: Retrospectively, 17 patients with cancer were reviewed who had 20 PCP episodes that occurred during a 3-year period (1988-1990). RESULTS: Twelve patients had a hematologic malignant lesion, and five had a solid tumor as their underlying disease. Cytotoxic and/or immunosuppressive drugs were used in 16 patients (94%). The clinical presentation varied from fulminant to inapparent pneumonia. Clinical improvement and survival after appropriate therapy occurred in 12 patients (70%), whereas the remaining 5 patients died within 4 weeks of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment initiation. In two patients, pentamidine was substituted. Complications of treatment occurred in six patients (35%). When survivors were compared with nonsurvivors, there was no difference in mean age, leukocyte counts, arterial oxygen tension, or duration of symptoms before treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, nosocomial transmission of PCP was unlikely. Prophylaxis after a first episode of PCP should be considered in patients who will remain immunosuppressed.

First line combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide in advanced ovarian cancer.

Thirty-one consecutive patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer entered a phase II study with cisplatin and etoposide combination chemotherapy. None of them had received prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Most patients had advanced (88%) or far advanced (61%) disease. All 31 patients are evaluable for toxicity which was significant and led to removal of five (16%) patients from the study. Of the 23 patients evaluable for response there were four clinical complete (CR) and eight partial (PR) responders for a total clinical response rate of 52% of evaluable patients and 39% of all patients. Eight patients (four clinical CR and four good PR) have undergone second look laparotomy with pathological CR in one of the clinical CR patients. Median survival time for responders and non-responders is 19 and 8 months respectively. The results obtained appear to be inferior to other cisplatin based combinations. Although this could be attributed to the unusually high proportion of patients with bulky disease and stage IV patients, we feel that the study suggests that etoposide did not add any benefits for this patient population to cisplatin as a single agent.