Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 15(6): e39911, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37404394

ABSTRACT

Background Cesarean section (CS) involves the delivery of the fetus through incisions in the abdomen or uterine walls which is an alternative to vaginal delivery. In the majority of women, second-stage CS is performed without even attempting assisted vaginal delivery. This leads to difficulty for obstetricians for whether to perform an immediate CS or attempt a difficult vaginal birth as the effective method of delivery as CS are linked with higher morbidities which further increase when a CS is performed in the second stage. Hence, the present study was performed to find out obstetrics results in women undergoing second-stage CS. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a tertiary care center attached to a medical college to study obstetric outcomes in women undergoing second-stage CS from January 2021 to December 2022 on 54 postnatal women who underwent second-stage CS. Results The mean age was 26.7 ± 3.9 years ranging between 19 and 35 years involving a majority of primiparity women. Maximum patients were having gestational age between 39 and 40 weeks and had spontaneous labor. The main indication of second-stage CS was non-reassuring fetal status and the method of delivery mainly involved for the deeply impacted head was the modified patwardhan technique in which if the head is embedded deeply in the pelvis in the OP position the anterior shoulder is delivered first followed by the same side leg then opposite side leg followed by the arm is gently delivered. Baby's trunk, legs, and buttocks are moved out by pulling them carefully and gently. And lastly, the head of the infant is finally moved out. The intra-operative complications mainly found were an extension of uterine angle and the post-operative complication was post-partum hemorrhage (PPH). The most common neonatal complication was the requirement for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. In conclusion, the present study reported a hospital range between seven and 14 days in comparison to other studies that reported hospital stays between three and 15 days. Conclusion In conclusion, higher maternal and fetal morbidities were associated with CS performed at full dilation of the cervix. The most common maternal complication seen was an injury to uterine vessels along with PPH however neonatal complications included the requirement of NICU monitoring. As there are no appropriate guidelines for the same, formulation of guidelines for performing CS at full dilation is required.

2.
Cureus ; 15(5): e39508, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37366437

ABSTRACT

Background Iron requirements rise dramatically throughout the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Pregnant women are more susceptible to anemia because their need for iron increases during pregnancy, which is difficult to achieve through diet alone. Methodology A randomized controlled trial (non-blinded and parallel group) was undertaken with the recruitment of 174 women. However, 35 women were lost to follow-up, and the study was ultimately completed with 139 participants distributing 68 women in Group A (intervention group) and 71 women in Group B (non-interventional group). Educational handouts were explained to the participants with iron supplements in Group A and only supplements were given to Group B, and the participants were followed up till three months before the recruitment period. Compliance with iron supplementation and a rise in hemoglobin were noted. Results In this study, maximum women were in the 22-30 years age group and were almost evenly distributed with respect to parity with no statistically significant difference in the groups. All the participants were started with oral iron therapy. No additional parenteral iron therapy was given. Women in Group A showed good compliance for iron supplementation than those in Group B. It was determined that this difference was statistically insignificant (>0.05). In the majority of women, the reason for poor compliance was frustration to follow oral iron therapy daily (52.3% in Group A and 21.7% in Group B). There were other reasons like forgetfulness, heartburn, vomiting, constipation, and nausea as the reason for poor compliance. The hemoglobin levels were compared at the recruitment and a mean rise in hemoglobin levels was noted in groups A and B at the follow-up period after three months. There was a greater mean rise in hemoglobin concentration in Group A (1.28) than in Group B (0.63), which was statistically insignificant (>0.05). Conclusion The current study found that among pregnant women with iron-deficient anemia, instructional handouts did not promote compliance with oral iron treatment. The main reasons for low compliance were frustration with taking the oral drug, followed by forgetfulness, heartburn, vomiting, constipation, and nausea. In pregnant females with anemia brought on by iron deficiency, educational handouts did not enhance hemoglobin status.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...