ABSTRACT
Adsorption is a widely used chemical engineering unit operation for the separation and purification of fluid streams. Typical uses of adsorption include the removal of targeted pollutants like antibiotics, dyes, heavy metals, and other small to large molecules from aqueous solutions or wastewater. To date several adsorbents that vary in terms of their physicochemical properties and costs have been tested for their efficacy to remove these pollutants from wastewater. Irrespective of the type of adsorbent, nature of the pollutant, or experimental conditions, the overall cost of adsorption depends directly on the adsorption contact time and the cost of the adsorbent materials. Thus, it is essential to minimize the amount of adsorbent and the contact time required. We carefully reviewed the attempts made by several researchers to minimize these two parameters using theoretical adsorption kinetics and isotherms. We also clearly explained the theoretical methods and the calculation procedures involved during the optimization of the adsorbent mass and the contact time. To complement the theoretical calculation procedures, we also made a detailed review on the theoretical adsorption isotherms that are commonly used to model experimental equilibrium data that can be used to optimize the adsorbent mass.
ABSTRACT
Polyethylene (PE) has been used extensively in knee arthroplasty since the mid 20th century. Progress in material manufacturing and processing has led to newer polyethylenes over last few decades with different material properties. It has been established that PE wear in knee arthroplasty causes particle induced osteolysis which is the main reason for late failure and requires revision surgery. Although there are various causes of wear, the properties of PE have long been a matter of investigation as a contributory factor. The advent of newer highly cross linked PE has been shown to improve wear rates in hip arthroplasty but the benefits have not been shown to be of the same degree in knee arthroplasty. The laboratory and clinical studies so far are limited and slightly conflicting in their conclusions. The risks of using highly cross linked PE in knee arthroplasty include tibial post fracture, disruption of locking mechanism, liner fracture which can lead to increased wear and osteolysis. The current evidence suggests that highly cross linked polyethylenes should be used with caution and only considered in younger active patients. The results of a recently completed randomized trial to compare the conventional with high molecular weight PE in knee arthroplasty are awaited.
