Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 38(11): 2363-2372, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36434346

ABSTRACT

Right ventricular (RV) function is a major determinant of prognosis and adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). It is largely unknown if HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) patients have some special characteristics in RV function (RVF) that may distinguish them from HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF or HFpEF) patients. Standard echocardiography was performed to estimate RVF [tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TDSV), plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), TAPSE to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) and RV myocardial performance index (MPI-TEI index)] in a cross-sectional study. In 306 participants, the RV systolic function evaluated with TAPSE and TDSV was impaired in 39.1 and 24.2%, respectively. TAPSE, TAPSE/PASP and TDSV were lower in HFmrEF compared with HFpEF and higher compared with HFrEF (p < 0.001 for among-groups comparison). RV diastolic dysfunction varied between 12.6 and 43.8% depending on the echocardiographic parameter. Diastolic RVF determined by tricuspid inflow E/A wave ratio (Et/At) was impaired in less patients with HFmrEF compared with those with HFpEF or HFrEF (25.9% vs 48.4% vs 56.3%; p = 0.030, respectively). RV diastolic dysfunction by et'/at' (tissue Doppler tricuspid valve annulus e' and a' waves) was impaired in less patients with HFmrEF compared with HFrEF (11.8% vs 33.3%; p = 0.019). A multivariate regression analysis revealed a significant association between RV and LV systolic dysfunction. The present study shows a high prevalence of RV dysfunction in HFmrEF patients. Study findings provides some new insights on RV and LV systolic dysfunction coupling whereas RV diastolic dysfunction was not dependent on LV systolic dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Predictive Value of Tests , Stroke Volume
2.
EuroIntervention ; 16(14): 1163-1169, 2021 02 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32715996

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We aimed to demonstrate whether coronary microvascular function is improved after ticagrelor administration compared to clopidogrel administration in STEMI subjects undergoing thrombolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: MIRTOS is a multicentre study of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in STEMI subjects treated with fibrinolysis. We enrolled 335 patients <75 years old with STEMI eligible for thrombolysis, of whom 167 were randomised to receive clopidogrel and 168 to receive ticagrelor together with thrombolysis. Primary outcome was the difference in post-PCI corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC). All clinical events were recorded in a three-month follow-up period. From the 335 patients who were randomised, 259 underwent PCI (129 clopidogrel and 130 ticagrelor) and 154 angiographies were analysable for the study primary endpoint. No significant difference was found between the clopidogrel (n=85) and ticagrelor (n=69) groups for CTFC (24.33±17.35 vs 28.33±17.59, p=0.10). No significant differences were observed in MACE and major bleeding events between randomisation groups (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 0.18-22.2, p=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis with ticagrelor in patients <75 years old was not able to demonstrate superiority compared to clopidogrel in terms of microvascular injury, while there was no difference between the two groups in MACE and major bleeding events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02429271. EudraCT Number 2014-004082-25.


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Aged , Clopidogrel/adverse effects , Fibrinolysis , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy , Ticagrelor/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Sex Med ; 16(8): 1199-1211, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31133422

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sexual health plays an important role in heart failure (HF) patients, and the relationship between HF and sexual dysfunction is well established; however, the role of right ventricular function in sexual dysfunction has not been investigated sufficiently. AIM: To investigate the potential association between right ventricular dysfunction and sexual dysfunction in both male and female patients with HF. METHODS: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of HF were evaluated in a cross-sectional study. Patients from the whole spectrum of HF were included in the study, regardless of cause, duration, and classification of HF. Sexual function in men was evaluated with the International Index of Erectile Function and in women with the Female Sexual Functioning Index. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We demonstrate that right ventricular dysfunction is associated with worse sexual function in both men and women. RESULTS: 306 consecutive patients with HF participated in the study. Right ventricular systolic dysfunction ranged from 24.2-39.1% and right ventricular diastolic dysfunction from 16.1-83.1%, depending on the echocardiographic parameter that was assessed. Right ventricular systolic dysfunction assessed by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), TAPSE/pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratio, and right ventricular basal diameter was associated with a lower International Index of Erectile Function score (P = .031, P = .009, and P < .001, respectively). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that erectile function was independently associated only with TAPSE/pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratio and tricuspid late tricuspid diastolic flow velocity wave (ß = 32.84, P = .006; and ß = -0.47, P = .026, respectively), whereas female sexual function was independently associated only with the early tricuspid diastolic flow velocity/late tricuspid diastolic flow velocity ratio (ß= -0.47, P = .026). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our study demonstrates that right ventricular dysfunction in patients with HF reflects an impaired sexual function status. Physicians should be aware of this association and closely evaluate those patients for sexual dysfunction. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: We innovatively assessed the correlation between right ventricular dysfunction and sexual function using validated questionnaires. The main limitation is the relatively small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides some new insights into the relationship between sexual dysfunction and right ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction in HF patients, also suggesting potential interventions to improve sexual and right ventricular function and prognosis in this population. Koutsampasopoulos K, Vogiatzis I, Ziakas A, et al. Right Ventricular Function and Sexual Function: Exploring Shadows in Male and Female Patients With Heart Failure. J Sex Med 2019;16:1199-1211.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/complications , Sexual Behavior/physiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/epidemiology , Ventricular Function, Right/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Echocardiography , Female , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Stroke Volume , Systole
4.
Curr Vasc Pharmacol ; 13(3): 368-80, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25426732

ABSTRACT

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Arterial hypertension (AH), arterial stiffness (AS), older age, and female gender are the main determinants of HFpEF, but several cardiac or extra-cardiac pathologies are also possible causes. The combined ventricular-vascular stiffening (abnormal left atrium-left ventricle coupling related to AS) is the main contributor of the increased prevalence of HFpEF in elderly persons, particularly elderly women, and in younger persons with AH. The hospitalization and mortality rates of HFpEF are similar to those of heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF). However, although the prognosis of HFrEF has been substantially improved during the last 2 decades, the effective treatment of HFpEF remains an unmet need. Regimens effective in HFrEF have no substantial effect on HFpEF, because of different pathophysiologies of the 2 syndromes. Pipeline drugs seem promising, but it will take some years before they are commercially available. Aggressive treatment of noncardiac comorbidities seems to be the only option at hand. Treatment of anaemia, sleep disorders, chronic kidney disease (CKD), non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFLD), atrial fibrillation, diabetes, and careful use of diuretics to reduce preload are effective to some degree. Statin treatment, despite the presence of dyslipidaemia, deserves special attention because it has been proven, mainly in small studies or post hoc analyses of trials, that it offers a substantial improvement in quality of life and a reduction in mortality rates. We need to urgently utilize these recourses to relieve a considerable part of the general population suffering from HFpEF, a deadly disease.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Stroke Volume , Vascular Diseases/drug therapy , Vascular Stiffness , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...