Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Cancer-Related Complications.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients are at risk for severe complications related to the underlying malignancy or its treatment and, therefore, usually require admission to intensive care units (ICU). Here, we evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes in this subgroup of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of two prospective cohorts of cancer patients admitted to ICUs. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify variables associated with hospital mortality. RESULTS: Out of 2,028 patients, 456 (23%) had cancer-related complications. Compared to those without cancer-related complications, they more frequently had worse performance status (PS) (57% vs 36% with PS≥2), active malignancy (95% vs 58%), need for vasopressors (45% vs 34%), mechanical ventilation (70% vs 51%) and dialysis (12% vs 8%) (P<0.001 for all analyses). ICU (47% vs. 27%) and hospital (63% vs. 38%) mortality rates were also higher in patients with cancer-related complications (P<0.001). Chemo/radiation therapy-induced toxicity (6%), venous thromboembolism (5%), respiratory failure (4%), gastrointestinal involvement (3%) and vena cava syndrome (VCS) (2%) were the most frequent cancer-related complications. In multivariable analysis, the presence of cancer-related complications per se was not associated with mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 1.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.66), P = 0.131]. However, among the individual cancer-related complications, VCS [OR = 3.79 (1.11-12.92), P = 0.033], gastrointestinal involvement [OR = 3.05 (1.57-5.91), P = <0.001] and respiratory failure [OR = 1.96(1.04-3.71), P = 0.038] were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic impact of cancer-related complications was variable. Although some complications were associated with worse outcomes, the presence of an acute cancer-related complication per se should not guide decisions to admit a patient to ICU.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill patients.

Antiphospholipid antibodies are responsible for a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Venous, arterial and microvascular thrombosis and severe catastrophic cases account for a large morbidly/mortality. Through the connection between the immune, inflammatory and hemostatic systems, it is possible that these antibodies may contribute to the development of organ dysfunction and are associated with poor short and long-term prognoses in critically ill patients. We performed a search of the PubMed/MedLine database for articles written during the period from January 2000 to February 2013 to evaluate the frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill patients and their impact on the outcomes of these patients. Only eight original studies involving critically ill patients were found. However, the development of antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill patients seems to be frequent, but more studies are necessary to clarify their pathogenic role and implications for clinical practice.

Anticorpos antifosfolipídeos em pacientes gravemente enfermos / Antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill patients

Os anticorpos antifosfolipídeos são responsáveis por um amplo espectro de manifestações clínicas. A trombose venosa, arterial e microvascular, e casos graves e catastróficos são responsáveis por importante morbidade/mortalidade. Por meio da conexão dos sistemas imune, inflamatório e hemostático, é possível que esses anticorpos contribuam para o desenvolvimento de disfunções orgânicas e sejam associados com um pior prognóstico, tanto em curto quanto em longo prazos, em pacientes gravemente enfermos. Realizamos uma pesquisa do período entre janeiro de 2000 e fevereiro de 2013, utilizando a base de dados PubMed/MedLine, para avaliar a frequência de anticorpos antifosfolipídeos em pacientes gravemente enfermos e seu impacto nos desfechos desses pacientes. Encontramos apenas oito estudos originais envolvendo pacientes gravemente enfermos. Contudo, o desenvolvimento de anticorpos antifosfolipídeos parece ser frequente em pacientes gravemente enfermos, sendo porém necessários mais estudos para esclarecer seu papel patogênico e suas implicações na prática clínica.

Antiphospholipid antibodies are responsible for a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Venous, arterial and microvascular thrombosis and severe catastrophic cases account for a large morbidly/mortality. Through the connection between the immune, inflammatory and hemostatic systems, it is possible that these antibodies may contribute to the development of organ dysfunction and are associated with poor short and long-term prognoses in critically ill patients. We performed a search of the PubMed/MedLine database for articles written during the period from January 2000 to February 2013 to evaluate the frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill patients and their impact on the outcomes of these patients. Only eight original studies involving critically ill patients were found. However, the development of antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill patients seems to be frequent, but more studies are necessary to clarify their pathogenic role and implications for clinical practice.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and the prognostic impact of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in critically ill cancer patients. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit for more than 48 hours at a cancer center. Clinical and laboratory data including coagulation parameters were obtained. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of 6-month mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-five (solid tumor, 79%; hematologic malignancies, 21%) patients were included, and aPL were identified in 74% of them. Median Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were 51 (37-65) and 5 (2-8) points, respectively. The most frequent aPL were lupus anticoagulant (61%) and anti-ß2 glicoprotein I (32%). Vascular complications occurred in 18% of patients and were comparable between aPL+ and aPL- patients. Sepsis and need for renal replacement therapy were more frequent in aPL+ patients. Hospital and 6-month mortality rates were 44% and 56%, respectively. Higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (each point) (hazard ratios [HR]=2.83 [95% confidence interval, 1.59-5.00]), medical admissions (HR=2.66 [1.34-5.27]), and d-dimer more than 500 ng/dL (HR=1.89 (1.04-3.44]) were independently associated with mortality. After adjusting for these covariates, aPL status was not associated with outcomes (HR=1.22 [0.60-2.47]). CONCLUSIONS: Lupus anticoagulants were frequent in critically ill cancer patients. However, they were not associated with medium-term survival in these patients.