What results can be expected one year after complex incisional hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh?

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication after midline laparotomy. The current standard repair includes the use of a synthetic mesh to prevent recurrence. However, the use of a synthetic mesh in a contaminated field carries a higher risk of mesh infection. In this setting biologic and biosynthetic meshes can be used as they resist to infection, but these are absorbable meshes. This raises the question of the risk of recurrence as the mesh disappears. Phasix® is a biosynthetic mesh getting absorbed in 12-18 months. The aim of this study was to assess the 1-year recurrence rate after abdominal-wall repair with a Phasix® mesh. METHODS: All patients undergoing ventral hernia repair between 2016 and 2018 at the University Hospital of Dijon using a Phasix® mesh were prospectively included in a database. They were all followed-up with a physical exam and a routine CT scan at one year. All postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included in the study (55.2% women), with a mean BMI of 30,25 kg/m2. Nineteen meshes were sublay and 10 intraperitoneal. Complications at 1 month were mainly mild: Clavien-Dindo I and II (61.1%). No mesh was explanted. There was no chronic infection. The mean length of stay was 11.5 days. The 1-year recurrence rate was 10.3%. CONCLUSION: Patients having undergone complex ventral hernia repair with a Phasix® mesh have a 1-year recurrence rate of 10.3%. No severe surgical site occurrence was detected. A longer follow-up in a larger number of patients could confirm the place of this mesh in abdominal-wall repair.

Inflammatory markers for the early detection of post-operative infection: The same threshold for rectal and colic surgery?

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic fistula is the most fearsome complication following colorectal surgery. Numerous studies have demonstrated the interest of postoperative CRP assay as an early diagnostic marker. Must the critical threshold for biological inflammatory markers remain the same, whether resection be colic or rectal? PATIENTS AND METHOD: This is a study based on a cohort constituted between 2011 and 2014, including 497 patients with planned colorectal resection. C-reactive protein and pro-calcitonin were measured daily from day before surgery to D4. All postoperative intra-abdominal complications were considered as an anastomotic fistula. Detection thresholds were calculated from the area under the ROC curve. RESULTS: An intra-abdominal septic complication occurred in 16.9% of the patients having undergone rectal resection vs. 9.9% of those having had colectomy (P=0.03). In the absence of complications there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative inflammatory response as determined by either CRP or PCT assay. Following rectal resection, optimal area under the curve (AUC=0.87) corresponds to CRP on D4 for a threshold of 100mg/L: sensitivity 83.3%, NPV 95.3%. For colons with the same CRP at 100mg/L (AUC=0.71): sensitivity 63.6%, NPV 93.9%. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding riskier surgery, the detection threshold for an anastomotic fistula following rectal surgery remains the same: CRP>100mg/L at D4.