Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
2.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 32(7-8): 620-3, 2004.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15450261

ABSTRACT

A case of primary choriocarcinoma of the ovary in a 32-year-old woman, 1 month after a voluntary interruption of pregnancy, is reported. A review of the literature shows that this tumour is rare and the distinction between a gestational and a non-gestational choriocarcinoma is difficult. The distinction between these two diagnoses and specific treatment are discussed.


Subject(s)
Choriocarcinoma/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Abortion, Induced , Adult , Choriocarcinoma/pathology , Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/blood , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Pregnancy
3.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 29(5): 445-53, 2000 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11011273

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interest and to compare the major echographic signs of Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: A bibliographic research has been performed for most of the echographic signs known and studied until now. For each study and in average for each sign, we have computed its sensitivity, its specificity, its positive and negative predictive values using the results of the different authors. Then, we have compared the benefits/risk ratio for each of these signs: the number of Down syndrome cases detected versus healthy fetus lost due to amniocentesis complications. RESULTS: The different signs can be ranked according to their benefits/risk ratio from top to bottom as follows: nuchal skinfold thickness, wide space between first and second toe, pyelectasis, large iliac angle, short humerus, short femur, hypoplasia of the middle phalanx of the fifth digit. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that second trimester echographic signs of Down syndrome must be evaluated as a function of the Down syndrome risk in the population under study. The presence of these signs does not always justify an amniocentesis; it should lead to a re-evaluation of the individual risk of a Down syndrome (a chart is given to guide this re-evaluation).


Subject(s)
Down Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/embryology , Fingers/diagnostic imaging , Fingers/embryology , Humans , Humerus , Ilium/diagnostic imaging , Ilium/embryology , Neck/diagnostic imaging , Neck/embryology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second
4.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 28(10): 729-37, 2000 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11244635

ABSTRACT

From October 1993 to February 1998, 33 cases of fetal cardiac arrhythmia were investigated by doppler-echocardiography at the Lille infantile and congenital cardiology department. Extrasystolic arrhythmias were the most frequently encountered disorder (25 fetuses, i.e., 76% of cases: 24 instances of extrasystolic auricular arrhythmia and one case of extrasystolic ventricular arrhythmia). They were invariably benign, and apart from one case only required standard monitoring. Tachycardia was observed in 15% of cases (three cases of supraventricular tachycardia [SVT] and two cases of auricular flutter [AF]). In no instance was a cardiopathic syndrome noted. A number of efficient treatments have been described, but the prognosis is often poor in the presence of hydrops fetalis. Direct fetal treatments (cordocentesis) are currently under evaluation, and at present can only be used as a last resort. In our series, one fetus died 15 minutes after transplacental Flecaine (flecainide) administration. Two of the three SVT and the two AF cases were successfully treated. Bradycardia, which was unassociated with extrasystolic arrhythmia, was found in 9% of cases. It is concluded that Flecaine is probably the treatment of choice for supraventricular and ventricular fetal tachycardia, as it has no teratogenic effect and crosses the placenta at a fetal concentration that is 80% of the maternal level. However, the administration of this drug is not without risk. It is known to possess certain negative side effects, and its pharmacological profile and maternal and fetal health risks have not yet been fully investigated. At present, no entirely safe and efficient treatment for fetal cardiac arrhythmia has been found.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Fetal Diseases/diagnosis , Fetal Diseases/therapy , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Bradycardia/diagnosis , Bradycardia/therapy , Cardiac Complexes, Premature/diagnosis , Cardiac Complexes, Premature/therapy , Echocardiography, Doppler , Female , Flecainide/administration & dosage , Flecainide/adverse effects , Flecainide/therapeutic use , Humans , Hydrops Fetalis/complications , Pregnancy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Tachycardia/diagnosis , Tachycardia/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...