[Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver primary and metastases: the Lille experience]. / Radiothérapie stéréotaxique hépatique par CyberKnife(®) : l'expérience lilloise.

PURPOSE: The CyberKnife(®) system is a recent radiation therapy technique that allows treatment of liver lesions with real-time tracking. Because of its high precision, the dose administered to the tumor can be increased. We report Oscar-Lambret Cancer Centre experience in the treatment of primary and secondary liver lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective study analyzing all the patients who have been treated for their liver lesions since July 2007. A hundred and twenty patients have been treated: 42 for hepatocellular carcinoma, 72 for liver metastases and six for cholangiocarcinoma. Gold seeds need to be implanted before the treatment and are used as markers to follow the movement of the lesion due to respiration. On average, the treatment is administered in three to four sessions over 12 days. A total dose of 40 to 45 Gy at the 80% isodose is delivered. Local control and overall survival analysis with Log-rank is performed for each type of lesion. RESULTS: Treatment tolerance is good. The most common toxicities are of digestive type, pain and asthenia. Six gastro-duodenal ulcers and two radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) were observed. At a median follow-up of 15 months, the local control rate is respectively of 80.4% and 72.5% at 1 and 2 years. Overall survival is 84.6 and 58.3% at 1 and 2 years. The local control is significantly better for the hepatocellular carcinoma and overall survival is significantly better for liver metastases (P<0.05). The local control rate and overall survival at 1 year for cholangiocarcinoma is 100%. CONCLUSION: CyberKnife(®) is a promising technique, well tolerated, with tumoral local control rates comparable to other techniques. Its advantage is that it is very minimally invasive delivered as an outpatient procedure in a frail population of patient (disease, age).

Results and special considerations when treating elderly patients with CyberKnife®: a review of 345 cases.

The relatively recent introduction of CyberKnife® in the field of radiotherapy has prompted the question of accessibility and usefulness of this technique for seniors. From June 2007 to June 2009, we treated 345 patients of all ages with CyberKnife as part of a single-center study. Median age was 61 years (range, 8-86 years). Ninety-eight patients were over 70 and 17 were older than 80. The treatment could not be completed with 2% (2/98) patients over 70 vs. 3.6% (9/247) among the younger (ns). Physiologic or psychologic problems in maintaining position for a long time were not more frequent among those over 70. The same was true with those over 80. Patients over 70 years old are able to tolerate CyberKnife treatment as efficiently as their younger counterparts. Elderly patients should not be restricted from access to CyberKnife radiosurgery with curative intent.

[Sarcomas in irradiated fields: Recent data]. / Sarcomes en territoire irradié : actualités.

We reviewed the literature data on sarcomas in irradiated fields: incidence, risk factors, prognosis and therapeutic strategy. We discuss more specifically the key-role of p53 mutations and the potential consequences of new radiotherapy techniques.

[Demography of radiation oncology residents in France in 2008: current situation and perspectives for the next three years]. / Démographie des internes en oncologie-radiothérapie en France en 2008: état et perspectives pour les trois prochaines années.

PURPOSE: Although a recent increase in number of young radiation oncologists in training has been observed during the past decade, the general demographic evolution of radiation oncologists covers partially future needs. MATERIAL AND METHOD: During the seven past national annual courses, which were organised and supported by the Société française des jeunes radiothérapeutes oncologues (SFJRO), the Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO), the Collège national des enseignants de cancérologie (CNEC) and the Institut national du cancer (Inca), different types of surveys were realized in order to analyse demography, quality of training and motivations of French residents in radiation oncology. The latest results were collected during the last national course, which took place in March 2008. Seventy-five young French radiation oncologists ("internes des hopitaux" or residents) out of 110 participants who attended the national course and 75 questionnaires were analysed. RESULTS: Since 2002, the total number of residents increased regularly (50, 75, 103 and 109 residents respectively in 2000, 2005, 2007 and 2008). Men and women are presently 48.5% and 51.5% respectively. Qualitative analysis of practical and theoretical training was performed using a visual analogical scale from zero to 10. Scores of 56 and 61 were respectively observed. Other descriptions of local training in the different universities (clinical skills, clinical cases analysis, bibliography session...) are described. Finally, analysis of the motivations for choosing the radiation oncology speciality demonstrates common interests in both medical practice and technical aspects in oncology. Innovation, technology, imaging and research are also widely mentioned. Sixteen residents will finish their training by the end of 2008, 42 are expected in 2009 and 27 in 2010. Almost all residents believe that a postgraduate position is necessary to complete their training as assistant professor ("chefs de clinique-assistants des hôpitaux") in a university hospital or a cancer centre. Unfortunately, only 36 assistant professor positions are available in France, representing half of the need. Only 21 residents out of 104 already have a position as assistant professor. The availability of such a position remains undetermined for the rest of them. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recent increase in the number of residents in radiation oncology in France, the need to create new assistant professor positions is crucial to assure quality of training for this both medical and technical speciality. Since 2002, the establishment of SFJRO has facilitated national links among residents, between residents and professors (CNEC), and between the French society (SFRO) and the European society (ESTRO).