Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Am J Public Health ; 109(8): 1131-1137, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31219715

ABSTRACT

Objectives. To identify the impact of a strengths-focused HIV prevention program among high-risk heterosexual Black men. Methods. Barbershops in Brooklyn, New York, neighborhoods with high rates of heterosexually transmitted HIV were randomized to the intervention or an attention control program. Men were recruited from barbershops between 2012 and 2016 and participated in a single small group, peer-led session focused on HIV risk reduction skills and motivation, community health empowerment, and identification of personal strengths and communication skills. The outcome was defined as 1 or more acts of condomless anal or vaginal sex in the preceding 90 days at a 6-month interview. Results. Fifty-three barbershops (24 intervention, 29 control) and 860 men (436 intervention, 424 control) were recruited; follow-up was completed by 657 participants (352 intervention, 305 control). Intervention exposure was associated with a greater likelihood of no condomless sex (64.4%) than control group participation (54.1%; adjusted odds ratio = 1.61; 95% confidence interval = 1.05, 2.47). Conclusions. Program exposure resulted in reduced sexual risk behaviors, and the program was acceptable for administration in partnership with barbershops. Public Health Implications. Dissemination of similar programs could improve public health in communities with high rates of HIV attributable to heterosexual transmission.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/psychology , Community-Based Participatory Research/methods , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Promotion/methods , Heterosexuality/psychology , Risk Reduction Behavior , Adult , Humans , Male , New York City
2.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 12(4): 451-461, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30739899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is used to guide the design and evaluation of programs aimed at addressing complex health issues. Effective administrative management of CBPR projects is essential to ensuring the success and fidelity of these programs. OBJECTIVE: We identify an administrative framework to support the implementation and management of a community- academic CBPR initiative. METHODS: The Barbershop Talk with Brothers (BTWB) project was a cluster randomized CBPR intervention designed to reduce HIV among high-risk heterosexual men. Eight-hundred sixty men, representing 53 barbershops, participated in the project. RESULTS: The 3Ps framework is defined by 1) partnership, 2) product, and 3) process. We describe the implementation of the 3Ps through applied examples including partnership management strategies, planning of shared resources, and flexible budgeting that can support the unique infrastructure of a shared community-academic project. CONCLUSIONS: The 3Ps are a translatable framework for comparable shared community-academic research projects to adopt.


Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research/methods , Community-Institutional Relations , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Barbering , Community-Based Participatory Research/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Program Development , Universities/organization & administration
3.
JAMA Intern Med ; 176(6): 807-15, 2016 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27159126

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: The role of environmental contamination in recurrent Staphylococcus aureus infections within households and its potential effect on intervention strategies has been debated recently. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether household environmental contamination increases the risk for recurrent infection among individuals with a community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was conducted from November 1, 2011, to June 30, 2014, in the Columbia University Medical Center catchment area. All patients within 72 hours of presentation with skin or soft-tissue infections and blood, urine, or sputum cultures positive for MRSA were identified. Two hundred sixty-two patients met study inclusion criteria; 83 of these (31.7%) agreed to participate (index patients) with 214 household members. Participants were followed up for 6 months, and 62 of the 83 households (74.7%) completed follow-up. Participants and researchers were blinded to exposure status throughout the study. Follow-up was completed on June 30, 2014, and data were assessed from July 1, 2014, to February 19, 2016. EXPOSURE: Concordant environmental contamination, defined as having an isolate with the identical staphylococcal protein A and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec type or antibiogram type as the index patient's clinical isolate, present on 1 or more environmental surfaces at the time of a home visit to the index patient after infection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Index recurrent infection, defined as any self-reported infection among the index patients during follow-up. RESULTS: One patient did not complete any follow-up. Of the remaining 82 index patients, 53 (64.6%) were female and 59 (72.0%) were Hispanic. The mean age was 30 (SD, 20; range, 1-79) years. Forty-nine of 61 MRSA infections where the clinical isolate could be obtained (80.3%) were due to the epidemic strain USA300. Among the 82 households in which a patient had an index MRSA infection, the clinical isolate was present in the environment in 20 (24.4%) and not found in 62 (75.6%). Thirty-five patients (42.7%) reported a recurrent infection during follow-up, of whom 15 (42.9%) required hospitalization. Thirteen recurrent infections were from the 20 households (65.0%) with and 22 were from the 62 households (35.5%) without environmental contamination (P = .04). Environmental contamination increased the rate of index recurrent infection (incident rate ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.03-4.10; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Household environmental contamination was associated with an increased rate of recurrent infection. Environmental decontamination should be considered as a strategy to prevent future MRSA infections, particularly among households where an infection has occurred.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Environmental Microbiology , Family Characteristics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Academic Medical Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Community-Acquired Infections/ethnology , Community-Acquired Infections/transmission , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Household Articles , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/ethnology , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data
4.
PLoS One ; 7(11): e49900, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23152934

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The household is a recognized community reservoir for Staphylococcus aureus. This study investigated potential risk factors for intra-household S. aureus transmission, including the contribution of environmental contamination. METHODS: We investigated intra-household S. aureus transmission using a sample of multiple member households from a community-based case-control study examining risk factors for CA-MRSA infection conducted in Northern Manhattan. During a home visit, index subjects completed a questionnaire. All consenting household members were swabbed, as were standardized environmental household items. Swabs were cultured for S. aureus. Positive isolates underwent further molecular characterization. Intra-household transmission was defined as having identical strains among two or more household members. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for transmission. RESULTS: We enrolled 291 households: 146 index cases, 145 index controls and 687 of their household contacts. The majority of indexes were Hispanic (85%), low income (74%), and female (67%), with a mean age of 31 (range 1-79). The average size of case and control households was 4 people. S. aureus colonized individuals in 62% of households and contaminated the environment in 54% of households. USA300 was the predominant clinical infection, colonizing and environmental strain. Eighty-one households had evidence of intra-household transmission: 55 (38%) case and 26 (18%) control households (P<.01). Environmental contamination with a colonizing or clinical infection strain (aOR: 5.4 [2.9-10.3] P<.01) and the presence of a child under 5 (aOR: 2.3 [1.2-4.5] P = .02) were independently associated with transmission. In separate multivariable models, environmental contamination was associated with transmission among case (aOR 3.3, p<.01) and control households (aOR 27.2, p<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Environmental contamination with a colonizing or clinical infection strain was significantly and independently associated with transmission in a large community-based sample. Environmental contamination should be considered when treating S. aureus infections, particularly among households with multiple infected members.


Subject(s)
Environmental Microbiology , Environmental Pollution/analysis , Family Characteristics , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Colony Count, Microbial , Demography , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Risk Factors , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Young Adult
5.
PLoS One ; 6(7): e22407, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21818321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections are spreading, but the source of infections in non-epidemic settings remains poorly defined. METHODS: We carried out a community-based, case-control study investigating socio-demographic risk factors and infectious reservoirs associated with MRSA infections. Case patients presented with CA-MRSA infections to a New York hospital. Age-matched controls without infections were randomly selected from the hospital's Dental Clinic patient population. During a home visit, case and control subjects completed a questionnaire, nasal swabs were collected from index respondents and household members and standardized environmental surfaces were swabbed. Genotyping was performed on S. aureus isolates. RESULTS: We enrolled 95 case and 95 control subjects. Cases more frequently reported diabetes mellitus and a higher number of skin infections among household members. Among case households, 53 (56%) were environmentally contaminated with S. aureus, compared to 36 (38%) control households (p = .02). MRSA was detected on fomites in 30 (32%) case households and 5 (5%; p<.001) control households. More case patients, 20 (21%) were nasally colonized with MRSA than were control indexes, 2 (2%; p<.001). In a subgroup analysis, the clinical isolate (predominantly USA300), was more commonly detected on environmental surfaces in case households with recurrent MRSA infections (16/36, 44%) than those without (14/58, 24%, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The higher frequency of environmental contamination of case households with S. aureus in general and MRSA in particular implicates this as a potential reservoir for recolonization and increased risk of infection. Environmental colonization may contribute to the community spread of epidemic strains such as USA300.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Disease Reservoirs/microbiology , Environmental Microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Colony Count, Microbial , Environmental Exposure , Female , Household Articles , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Middle Aged , Nose/microbiology , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Young Adult
6.
Am J Public Health ; 101(7): 1268-76, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21653250

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We combined social-network analysis and molecular epidemiology to investigate Staphylococcus aureus among drug users. METHODS: From 2003 through 2005, we recruited adult drug users in Brooklyn, New York. Of 501 individuals recruited, 485 participated. Participants were screened for HIV infection and S. aureus carriage, and they answered a questionnaire assessing risk factors for S. aureus. Participants were asked to nominate up to 10 members of their social networks, and they were invited to recruit nominees to participate. RESULTS: We identified 89 sociocentric risk networks, 1 of which contained 327 (67%) members. One third of participants were either colonized (20%) or infected (19%) with S. aureus. Overall strain similarity was unusually high, suggesting spread within and across networks. In multivariate analysis, 7 health-related and drug-use variables remained independently associated with infection. Moreover, 27% of nominees were not drug users. CONCLUSIONS: We found a large, linked, hidden network among participants, with no discernible clustering of closely related strains. Our results suggest that once a pathogen is introduced into a sociocentric network of active drug users, an identifiable community S. aureus reservoir is likely created, with significant linkages to the general population.


Subject(s)
Drug Users/statistics & numerical data , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , New York City/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Social Support , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/etiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/etiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/transmission , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/microbiology , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/microbiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 55(4): 466-72, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20686410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HIV-positive patients at HELP/PSI, Inc, an in-patient drug rehabilitation center, had a high baseline prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus colonization (49%) and incidence of infection (17%) in a previous year-long study. METHODS: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted to determine whether repeated nasal application of mupirocin ointment would decrease the odds of S. aureus nasal colonization in 100 HELP/PSI patients over an 8-month period. A 5-day course of study drug was given monthly, and colonization was assessed at baseline and 1 month after each treatment. S. aureus infection was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: In repeated-measures analysis, mupirocin reduced the odds of monthly S. aureus nasal colonization by 83% compared with placebo [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) = 0.17; P < 0.0001]. Subjects colonized at study entry had a 91% reduction in subsequent colonization (ORadj = 0.09; P < 0.0001). Mupirocin also suppressed S. aureus colonization in subjects not colonized at baseline (ORadj = 0.23; P = 0.006). There was no difference in infection rates between the mupirocin and placebo groups (hazard ratio = 0.49, P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Monthly application of nasal mupirocin significantly decreased S. aureus colonization in HIV patients in residential drug rehabilitation. Monthly mupirocin application has a potential role in long-term care settings or in HIV-positive patients with high rates of S. aureus colonization and infection.


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Administration, Intranasal , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Methicillin Resistance , Ointments , Treatment Outcome
8.
PLoS One ; 4(8): e6708, 2009 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19693269

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections have increased dramatically in the community, yet S. aureus nasal colonization has remained stable. The objectives of this study were to determine if S. aureus colonization is a useful proxy measure to study disease transmission and infection in community settings, and to identify potential community reservoirs. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Randomly selected households in Northern Manhattan, completed a structured social network questionnaire and provided nasal swabs that were typed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis to identify S. aureus colonizing strains. The main outcome measures were: 1) colonization with S. aureus; and 2) recent serious skin infection. Risk factor analyses were conducted at both the individual and the household levels; logistic regression models identified independent risks for household colonization and infection. RESULTS: 321 surveyed households contained 914 members. The S. aureus prevalence was 25% and MRSA was 0.4%. More than 40% of households were colonized. Recent antibiotic use was the only significant correlate for household colonization (p = .002). Seventy-eight (24%) households reported serious skin infection. In contrast with colonization, five of the six risk factors that increased the risk of skin infection in the household at the univariate level remained independently significant in multivariable analysis: international travel, sports participation, surgery, antibiotic use and towel sharing. S. aureus colonization was not significantly associated with serious skin infection in any analysis. Among multiperson households with more than one person colonized, 50% carried the same strain. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The lack of association between S. aureus nasal colonization and serious skin infection underscores the need to explore alternative venues or body sites that may be crucial to transmission. Moreover, the magnitude of colonization and infection within the household suggests that households are an underappreciated and substantial community reservoir.


Subject(s)
Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Surveys and Questionnaires , Virulence
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 45(3): 343-6, 2007 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17599312

ABSTRACT

A longitudinal study of 282 community-based drug users was conducted from February 1999 through September 2000. Both the incidence (15.0 cases per 100 person-years at risk; 95% confidence interval, 10.2-20.7 cases per 100 person-years at risk) and persistence of Staphylococcus aureus carriage were increased among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive individuals.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/microbiology , Nasal Mucosa/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus , Analysis of Variance , DNA Primers , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , New York/epidemiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology
10.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 26(7): 622-8, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16092742

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between Staphylococcus aureus nasal and tracheal colonization and infection in medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of S. aureus infection in colonized versus non-colonized patients. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. Patients admitted to the MICU during the study period were screened for S. aureus nasal and tracheal colonization by culture and a PCR assay twice weekly. Demographic, clinical, and microbiologic data were collected in the MICU and for 30 days after discharge. PFGE and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed on all S. aureus nasal, tracheal, and clinical isolates. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of patients (47 of 208) were nasally colonized with S. aureus. Twenty-four percent of these patients developed S. aureus infections versus 2% of non-colonized patients (P < .01). Nine of 11 patients with both nasal colonization and infection were infected by their colonizing strain. Two of 47 nasally colonized patients developed an infection with a different strain of S. aureus. Fifty-three percent of intubated patients with nasal colonization (10 of 19) had tracheal colonization with S. aureus as opposed to 4.9% of intubated, non-colonized patients (3 of 61) (P < .01). Parenteral antibiotics were ineffective at clearing nasal colonization. PCR detected S. aureus colonization (nasal and tracheal) within 6.5 hours with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 99%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of S. aureus infection was significantly elevated in nasally colonized MICU patients. Techniques to rapidly detect colonization in this population may make targeted topical prevention strategies feasible.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Methicillin Resistance , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Nose/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Trachea/microbiology , Treatment Outcome
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 40(7): 1028-36, 2005 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15824996

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Persons with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) who use drugs appear to be at increased risk for colonization and infection with Staphylococcus aureus. Little is known about the nature of and risk factors responsible for this association. This study is among the first to prospectively follow carriage and infection in this uniquely high-risk population. METHODS: We prospectively followed the cases of 75 patients with AIDS in a residential drug treatment facility and screened for S. aureus nasal colonization and infection. RESULTS: Thirty-seven baseline cultures (49%) were positive for S. aureus, and 81% of subjects were colonized at least once during the study. Thirteen subjects experienced 17 infections. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and sequence-based typing methods revealed that 244 (92%) of the isolates belonged to either clonal type A or B. Clonal type A was methicillin-susceptible. Clonal type B consisted of 3 main subtypes (B1, B2, and B3), all with the same allelic profile (ST8) and staphylococcal protein A gene (spa) type (7). Of note, subtype B1 was methicillin-susceptible (ST8 and spa type 7), lacking mecA, whereas the other B clones were methicillin-resistant. Both clones were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Clonal type B isolates were relatively resistant, suggesting prior exposure to the health care setting. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a sustained high rate of S. aureus carriage and infection. It demonstrates the capacity of unique methicillin-resistant S. aureus clones with an established linkage to earlier outbreaks of methicillin-resistant S. aureus, as well as to human immunodeficiency virus--infected subjects, to persist in this residential setting. It also illustrates the apparent genetic instability or transmissibility of the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec type IV element.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/complications , Molecular Epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Carrier State , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nose/microbiology , Phenotype , Phylogeny , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/etiology , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics
12.
J Infect Dis ; 191(3): 444-52, 2005 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15633104

ABSTRACT

Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is often a prelude to infection with the same strain. The prevailing assumption has been that colonized individuals carry a single strain. The present study investigated the frequency of simultaneous nasal carriage of multiple strains of S. aureus. Three bacterial colonies from plated samples from colonized subjects were initially compared by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Fourteen of 148 S. aureus-positive samples demonstrated at least a difference of a single band; 7 of these 14 samples contained different strains, and 3 of these 7 also belonged to different accessory gene regulator (agr) types. The remaining 7 samples contained clonally related isolates; 3 of these 7 contained pairs that differed by the presence or absence of the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec type IV. A mathematical model that we developed predicted that approximately 6.6% of S. aureus-colonized individuals carry >1 strain. The present study demonstrates that carriage of discordant S. aureus strains in individuals with nasal colonization occurs regularly and suggests that the nares are likely sites for horizontal genetic exchange among strains.


Subject(s)
Carrier State/microbiology , Nose/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Carrier State/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Methicillin Resistance , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
13.
J Am Coll Health ; 52(4): 149-57, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15018426

ABSTRACT

To determine the extent and nature of alcohol screening and referral services provided by college health centers, the authors conducted a state-stratified, random sampling of 25% of 327 4-year accredited US colleges and universities with health centers. Of the 249 survey respondents, 32% routinely screened students for alcohol use. Urban, public, and large institutions were most likely to screen routinely. Only 11.7% of the sample reported they used standardized instruments, predominantly the CAGE. The health centers used an average of 3.4 referral options, but only 27.5% offered students access to campus programs specifically designed for students who are substance abusers. Findings suggest that the majority of college health centers are not providing routine alcohol screening for students or using standardized screening instruments. In addition, students are often referred to services that may be inappropriate or ineffective in addressing the needs of college drinkers.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Mass Screening , Referral and Consultation , Universities , Adolescent , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Humans , Population Surveillance , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 35(6): 671-7, 2002 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12203163

ABSTRACT

Drug users have a higher incidence of colonization with Staphylococcus aureus than does the general population, and, as a result, they are at increased risk of infection with their colonizing strain. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of drug-use risk networks in S. aureus transmission, the similarity of S. aureus isolates within these networks, and the possible role of inhalation drug use paraphernalia in the transmission of S. aureus. Strains of S. aureus are shared among colonized inhalation drug users within drug-use risk networks. It suggests that patterns of drug use and the geographic location where drug sharing occurs are major contributors to the transfer of staphylococci and, as a result, to the high prevalence of staphylococcal colonization and perhaps disease in this population.


Subject(s)
Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Substance-Related Disorders/microbiology , Adult , Carrier State , Female , Humans , Male , Nasal Cavity/microbiology , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology
15.
J Clin Microbiol ; 40(7): 2594-7, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12089282

ABSTRACT

It is unclear whether the levels of Staphylococcus aureus colonization of hospital personnel with patient exposure are increased or whether personnel become colonized with more antibiotic-resistant strains. Differences in nasal and hand carriage of S. aureus between medical and nonmedical hospital personnel were examined. No differences in nasal carriage between the two groups were found; however, there was a trend that suggested differences in the rates of hand carriage of S. aureus (18% of nonmedical personnel and 10% of medical personnel). Medical personnel were colonized with more antibiotic-resistant isolates than nonmedical personnel (mean, 2.8 versus 2.1 isolates [P < 0.03]), and the strain profiles indicated that they tended to be more clonal in origin, suggesting that exposure to hospital isolates alters the colonization profile.


Subject(s)
Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Adult , Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Female , Hand/microbiology , Humans , Male , Medical Staff, Hospital , Methicillin Resistance , Middle Aged , Nose/microbiology , Personnel, Hospital , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...