ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Approximately, one in ten infants is born preterm or requires hospitalization at birth. These complications at birth have long-term consequences that can extend into childhood and adulthood. Timely detection of developmental delay through surveillance could enable tailored support for these babies and their families. However, the possibilities for follow-up are limited, especially in middle- and low-income countries, and the tools to do so are either not available or too expensive. A standardized and core set of outcomes for neonates, with feasible tools for evaluation and follow-up, could result in improving quality, enhance shared decision-making, and enable global benchmarking. METHODS: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) convened an international working group, which was comprised of 14 health-care professionals (HCP) and 6 patient representatives in the field of neonatal care. An outcome set was developed using a three-round modified Delphi process, and it was endorsed through a patient representative-validation survey and an HCP survey. RESULTS: A literature review revealed 1,076 articles and 26 registries which were screened for meaningful outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures, clinical measures, and case mix variables. This resulted in a neonatal set with 21 core outcomes covering three domains (physical, social, and mental functioning) and 14 tools to assess these outcomes at three timepoints. DISCUSSION: This set can be implemented globally and it will allow comparison of outcomes across different settings and countries. The transparent consensus-driven development process which involved stakeholders and professionals from all over the world ensures global relevance.
Subject(s)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of Life , Adult , Child , Consensus , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: The objective of the present study was to determine the clinicopathological factors and treatment outcomes of patients suffering from mesenteric or retroperitoneal extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A detailed search in PubMed, using the key words "extragastrointestinal stromal tumors" and "EGIST", found eight studies fulfilling the criteria of this study. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with a mesenteric and 24 patients with a retroperitoneal EGIST were analyzed, with a follow-up period ranging from 2 to 192 months. Retroperitoneal tumors presented as larger tumors than mesenteric ones, with 95% and 93% immunohistochemical positivity for CD117 antigen, respectively. Surgical resection was performed in 91% of cases, with 57% of patients with mesenteric and 70% of patients with retroperitoneal EGISTs being alive at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: EGISTs most commonly are of considerable size and usually with a high mitotic count, rendering them high-risk tumors. Tumor necrosis, nuclear atypia, tumor histology, and mutations in the tyrosine kinase KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) gene, seem to influence tumor behavior.
