Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 45(3): 700-705, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33221825

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: A growing body of data suggests that obesity influences coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our study's primary objective was to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) categories and critical forms of COVID-19. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Data on consecutive adult patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 at Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France) were extracted retrospectively. The association between BMI categories and the composite primary endpoint (admission to the intensive care unit or death) was probed in a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 433 patients were included, and BMI data were available for 329: 20 were underweight (6.1%), 95 have a normal weight (28.9%), 90 were overweight (27.4%), and 124 were obese (37.7%). The BMI category was associated with the primary endpoint in the fully adjusted model; the odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for overweight and obesity were respectively 1.58 [0.77-3.24] and 2.58 [1.28-5.31]. The ORs [95% CI] for ICU admission were similar for overweight (3.16 [1.29-8.06]) and obesity (3.05 [1.25-7.82]) in the fully adjusted model. The unadjusted ORs for death were similar in all BMI categories while obesity only was associated with higher risk after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that overweight (and not only obesity) is associated with ICU admission, but overweight is not associated with death.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Obesity/complications , Overweight/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Female , France , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Retrospective Studies
2.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 37(3): e3388, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32683744

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a rapidly progressing pandemic, with four million confirmed cases and 280 000 deaths at the time of writing. Some studies have suggested that diabetes is associated with a greater risk of developing severe forms of COVID-19. The primary objective of the present study was to compare the clinical features and outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with vs without diabetes. METHODS: All consecutive adult patients admitted to Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France) with confirmed COVID-19 up until April 21st, 2020, were included. The composite primary endpoint comprised admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and death. Both components were also analysed separately in a logistic regression analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 433 patients (median age: 72; 238 (55%) men; diabetes: 115 (26.6%)) were included. Most of the deaths occurred in non-ICU units and among older adults. Multivariate analyses showed that diabetes was associated neither with the primary endpoint (odds ratio (OR): 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-1.90) nor with mortality (hazard ratio: 0.73; 95%CI: 0.40-1.34) but was associated with ICU admission (OR: 2.06; 95%CI 1.09-3.92, P = .027) and a longer length of hospital stay. Age was negatively associated with ICU admission and positively associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes was prevalent in a quarter of the patients hospitalized with COVID-19; it was associated with a greater risk of ICU admission but not with a significant elevation in mortality. Further investigation of the relationship between COVID-19 severity and diabetes is warranted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Female , France/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
3.
Ann Pathol ; 40(1): 2-11, 2020 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31928795

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The profession of pathologist exposes to various risks, notably infectious, physical and chemical. The objective of this study was to make an inventory of these occupational risks to which pathologists are subjected and to evaluate the pathologies that they presented. A particular attention was given to microscopic and screen work as they can induce musculoskeletal or ophthalmic disorders, and stress-related psychological disorders. METHOD: An anonymous online questionnaire containing 54 questions had been sent by mail to pathologists via the French Society of Pathology and the Syndicate of French Pathologists. RESULTS: Five hundred and twelve pathologists responded to the survey. Thirty-eight percent reported musculoskeletal disorders in the last 6 months. Visual disturbances concerned 73.4% of respondents. In the last 12 months, 33.3% of pathologists had been injured or had had mucosal projections during macroscopic or autopsy specimens. The frequency of infectious diseases was low (6.2%) as well as that of cancers (3.9%). Psychological disorders such as depression or burnout were reported by 16.7% of respondents. Pathologists seemed happy at work and had a good overall lifestyle. Few doctors had medical follow-up and few had benefited from ergonomic advice and training on the risks of chemicals. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed the interest of a medical surveillance adapted to the pathologies presented by the pathologists. Educational and preventive measures should be introduced early in the career, focusing on ergonomics and learning about chemical and biological hazards.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Pathologists/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Autopsy/statistics & numerical data , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Ergonomics , Female , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infections/epidemiology , Job Satisfaction , Life Style , Male , Microscopy/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Workplace/organization & administration , Workplace/standards , Young Adult
4.
Presse Med ; 44(11): e321-9, 2015 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26142950

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of this study was to estimate prevalence on the liberal general practitioners. The secondary objectives are to identify the possible brakes with the declaration in the monitoring observatory for security of the doctors as well as to determine if the feminization of the profession was associated with the situations violence. METHODS: A questionnaire in 5 parts was submitted by telephone to 146 drawn lots liberal general practitioners. It approached the undergone physical and verbal attacks, the infringements on the properties arisen during their career, and the proven feeling of insecurity. RESULTS: The rate of participation was 63% (93/146). In all 171 incidents were reported among which 96 physical and verbal attacks (56%), and 75 infringements on the properties (44%) without difference according to the sex. The main motive for the attacks was the refusal of prescription (44%). Practically, no concerned doctor made declaration for the monitoring observatory for the security of the doctors, for lack of interest for 5 of them or the ignorance of its existence for 10 on 32 practitioners having undergone an aggression after the creation of the monitoring observatory. CONCLUSION: We observed an under-reporting of the attacks or of the infringements on the properties by the doctors victims. Our study did not highlight difference between men and women.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Workplace Violence , Adult , Fear , Female , France , General Practitioners/psychology , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , House Calls , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Office Visits , Patient Satisfaction , Physical Abuse/psychology , Physical Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Physician-Patient Relations , Physicians, Women/psychology , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Professional Practice , Social Control, Formal , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telephone , Theft , Verbal Behavior , Workplace Violence/legislation & jurisprudence , Workplace Violence/psychology , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data
5.
Sante Publique ; 26(5): 613-20, 2014.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25490220

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Excessive alcohol consumption and illicit drug use among students have negative repercussions on their health, education and society in general. Medical students are no exception. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the consumption of alcohol, tobacco and cannabis as well as levels of anxiety and depression of students admitted to the second year of medical studies based on anonymous self-administered questionnaires containing the following tests: AUDIT, Fagerstrom, CAST and HAD. RESULTS: 198 of the 207 students involved agreed to participate. Excessive alcohol consumption was higher among women than among men (35% versus 22%), but fewer women were alcohol-dependent (2% versus 8%) (p < 0.05). 16% of students were tobacco smokers, with no signs of dependence in 80% of cases. 15% of students smoked cannabis and 52% of them presented problem use. 21% of women had a suspected anxiety disorder and 23% had a proven anxiety disorder, versus 17% and 6% of men, respectively (p = 0.002). 3% had a suspected depressive disorder and 0.5% had a proven depressive disorder. High-risk alcohol consumption was significantly correlated with high-risk cannabis use. No correlation was demonstrated between anxiety or depression and these consumptions. DISCUSSION: Doctors appear to be particularly affected by psychological disorders or addictions and medical students are paradoxically less likely than the general population to receive appropriate care. Universities must provide monitoring and support for students in order to improve their health, but also to enable them to provide care and appropriate educational messages to their patients.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Marijuana Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...