Decrease in platelet count in patients with AKI and its association with major adverse kidney events.

INTRODUCTION: A reduction in platelet count in critically ill patients is a marker of severity of the clinical condition. However, whether this association holds true in acute kidney injury (AKI) is unknown. We analyzed the association between platelet reduction in patients with AKI and major adverse kidney events (MAKE). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, we included AKI patients at the Hospital Civil of Guadalajara, in Jalisco, Mexico. Patients were divided according to whether their platelet count fell >21% during the first 10 days. Our objectives were to analyze the associations between a platelet reduction >21% and MAKE at 10 days (MAKE10) or at 30-90 days (MAKE30-90) and death. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2023, 400 AKI patients were included, 134 of whom had a > 21% reduction in platelet count. The mean age was 54 years, 60% were male, and 44% had sepsis. The mean baseline platelet count was 194 x 103 cells/µL, and 65% of the KDIGO3 patients met these criteria. Those who underwent hemodialysis (HD) had lower platelet counts. After multiple adjustments, a platelet reduction >21% was associated with MAKE10 (OR 4.2, CI 2.1-8.5) but not with MAKE30-90. The mortality risk increased 3-fold (OR 2.9, CI 1.1-7.7, p = 0.02) with a greater decrease in the platelets (<90 x 103 cells/µL). As the platelets decreased, the incidence of MAKE was more likely to increase. These associations lost significance when accounting for starting HD. CONCLUSION: In our retrospective cohort of patients with AKI, a > 21% reduction in platelet count was associated with MAKE. Our results are useful for generating hypotheses and motivating us to continue studying this association with a more robust design.

A reduction in platelet count in critically ill patients has been associated with a worse prognosis, but it is not yet known whether this relationship also exists in patients with acute kidney injury, who are more susceptible to platelet decrease due to the syndrome or due to the onset of hemodialysis. In our study of acute kidney injury patients, we found that those whose platelet count decreased >21% during the first days were more likely to experience a major kidney event. In addition, the greater the decrease in platelet count was, the more likely these events were to occur. The significance of this association was lost in patients who start hemodialysis. Our conclusions could serve to generate hypotheses about this interesting relationship.

Guía de práctica clínica mexicana para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de las dislipidemias y enfermedad cardiovascular aterosclerótica.

ANTECEDENTES: Las enfermedades cardiovasculares son la principal causa mundial de mortalidad y México no es la excepción. Los datos epidemiológicos obtenidos en 1990 mostraron que los padecimientos cardiovasculares representaron el 19.8% de todas las causas de muerte en nuestro país; esta cifra se incrementó de manera significativa a un 25.5% para 2015. Diversas encuestas nacionales sugieren que más del 60% de la población adulta tiene al menos un factor de riesgo para padecer enfermedades cardiovasculares (obesidad o sobrepeso, hipertensión, tabaquismo, diabetes, dislipidemias). Por otro lado, datos de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud han relacionado el proceso de aterosclerosis como la primer causa de muerte prematura, reduciendo la expectativa de vida de manera sensible, lo que tiene una enorme repercusión social. OBJETIVO: Este documento constituye la guía de práctica clínica (GPC) elaborada por iniciativa de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cardiología en colaboración con la Sociedad Mexicana de Nutrición y Endocrinología, A.C., Asociación Nacional de Cardiólogos de México, A.C., Asociación Mexicana para la Prevención de la Aterosclerosis y sus Complicaciones, A.C., Comité Normativo Nacional de Medicina General, A.C., Colegio Nacional de Medicina Geriátrica, A.C., Colegio de Medicina Interna de México, A.C., Sociedad Mexicana de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular y Endovenosa, A.C., Instituto Mexicano de Investigaciones Nefrológicas, A.C. y la Academia Mexicana de Neurología, A.C.; con el apoyo metodológico de la Agencia Iberoamericana de Desarrollo y Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud, con la finalidad de establecer recomendaciones basadas en la mejor evidencia disponible y consensuadas por un grupo interdisciplinario de expertos. El objetivo de este documento es el de brindar recomendaciones basadas en evidencia para ayudar a los tomadores de decisión en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de las dislipidemias en nuestro país. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Este documento cumple con estándares internacionales de calidad, como los descritos por el Instituto de Medicina de EE.UU., el Instituto de Excelencia Clínica de Gran Bretaña, la Red Colegiada para el Desarrollo de Guías de Escocia y la Red Internacional de Guías de Práctica Clínica. Se integró un grupo multidisciplinario de expertos clínicos y metodólogos con experiencia en revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura y el desarrollo de guías de práctica clínica. Se consensuó un documento de alcances, se establecieron las preguntas clínicas relevantes, se identificó de manera exhaustiva la mejor evidencia disponible evaluada críticamente en revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura y se desarrollaron las recomendaciones clínicas. Se utilizó la metodología de Panel Delphi modificado para lograr un nivel de consenso adecuado en cada una de las recomendaciones contenidas en esta GPC. RESULTADOS: Se consensuaron 23 preguntas clínicas que dieron origen a sus respectivas recomendaciones clínicas. CONCLUSIONES: Esperamos que este documento contribuya a la mejor toma de decisiones clínicas y se convierta en un punto de referencia para los clínicos y pacientes en el manejo de las dislipidemias y esto contribuya a disminuir la morbilidad y mortalidad derivada de los eventos cardiovasculares ateroscleróticos en nuestro país. BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality worldwide and Mexico is no exception. The epidemiological data obtained in 1990 showed that cardiovascular diseases represented 19.8% of all causes of death in our country. This figure increased significantly to 25.5% for 2015. Some national surveys suggest that more than 60% of the adult population has at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease (obesity or overweight, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, dyslipidemias). On the other hand, data from the Pan American Health Organization have linked the process of atherosclerosis as the first cause of premature death, significantly reducing life expectancy, which has enormous social repercussions. OBJECTIVE: This document constitutes the Clinical Practice Guide (CPG) prepared at the initiative of the Mexican Society of Cardiology in collaboration with the Mexican Society of Nutrition and Endocrinology, AC, National Association of Cardiologists of Mexico, AC, Mexican Association for the Prevention of Atherosclerosis and its Complications, AC, National Normative Committee of General Medicine, AC, National College of Geriatric Medicine, AC, College of Internal Medicine of Mexico, AC, Mexican Society of Angiology and Vascular and Endovenous Surgery, AC, Mexican Institute of Research Nephrological, AC and the Mexican Academy of Neurology, A.C.; with the methodological support of the Ibero-American Agency for the Development and Evaluation of Health Technologies, in order to establish recommendations based on the best available evidence and agreed upon by an interdisciplinary group of experts. The objective of this document is to provide evidence-based recommendations to help decision makers in the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemias in our country. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This document complies with international quality standards, such as those described by the Institute of Medicine of the USA, the Institute of Clinical Excellence of Great Britain, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network and the Guidelines International Network. A multidisciplinary group of clinical experts and methodologists with experience in systematic reviews of the literature and the development of clinical practice guidelines was formed. A scope document was agreed upon, relevant clinical questions were established, the best available evidence critically evaluated in systematic literature reviews was exhaustively identified, and clinical recommendations were developed. The modified Delphi Panel methodology was used to achieve an adequate level of consensus in each of the recommendations contained in this CPG. RESULTS: 23 clinical questions were agreed upon which gave rise to their respective clinical recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: We consider that this document contributes to better clinical decision-making and becomes a point of reference for clinicians and patients in the management of dyslipidemias and this contributes to reducing the morbidity and mortality derived from atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in our country.

Guía de práctica clínica mexicana para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de las dislipidemias y enfermedad cardiovascular aterosclerótica / Mexican clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemias and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

resumen está disponible en el texto completo

Abstract Background: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality worldwide and Mexico is no exception. The epidemiological data obtained in 1990 showed that cardiovascular diseases represented 19.8% of all causes of death in our country. This figure increased significantly to 25.5% for 2015. Some national surveys suggest that more than 60% of the adult population has at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease (obesity or overweight, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, dyslipidemias). On the other hand, data from the Pan American Health Organization have linked the process of atherosclerosis as the first cause of premature death, significantly reducing life expectancy, which has enormous social repercussions. Objective: This document constitutes the Clinical Practice Guide (CPG) prepared at the initiative of the Mexican Society of Cardiology in collaboration with the Mexican Society of Nutrition and Endocrinology, AC, National Association of Cardiologists of Mexico, AC, Mexican Association for the Prevention of Atherosclerosis and its Complications, AC, National Normative Committee of General Medicine, AC, National College of Geriatric Medicine, AC, College of Internal Medicine of Mexico, AC, Mexican Society of Angiology and Vascular and Endovenous Surgery, AC, Mexican Institute of Research Nephrological, AC and the Mexican Academy of Neurology, A.C.; with the methodological support of the Ibero-American Agency for the Development and Evaluation of Health Technologies, in order to establish recommendations based on the best available evidence and agreed upon by an interdisciplinary group of experts. The objective of this document is to provide evidence-based recommendations to help decision makers in the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemias in our country. Material and methods: This document complies with international quality standards, such as those described by the Institute of Medicine of the USA, the Institute of Clinical Excellence of Great Britain, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network and the Guidelines International Network. A multidisciplinary group of clinical experts and methodologists with experience in systematic reviews of the literature and the development of clinical practice guidelines was formed. A scope document was agreed upon, relevant clinical questions were established, the best available evidence critically evaluated in systematic literature reviews was exhaustively identified, and clinical recommendations were developed. The modified Delphi Panel methodology was used to achieve an adequate level of consensus in each of the recommendations contained in this CPG. Results: 23 clinical questions were agreed upon which gave rise to their respective clinical recommendations. Conclusions: We consider that this document contributes to better clinical decision-making and becomes a point of reference for clinicians and patients in the management of dyslipidemias and this contributes to reducing the morbidity and mortality derived from atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in our country.

Association between Postmortem Kidney Biopsy Findings and Acute Kidney Injury from Patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: AKI in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to identify the kidney histopathologic characteristics of deceased patients with diagnosis of COVID-19 and evaluate the association between biopsy findings and clinical variables, including AKI severity. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Our multicenter, observational study of deceased patients with COVID-19 in three third-level centers in Mexico City evaluated postmortem kidney biopsy by light and electron microscopy analysis in all cases. Descriptive and association statistics were performed between the clinical and histologic variables. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were included. Median age was 57 (49-66) years, 69% were men, body mass index was 29 (26-35) kg/m2, 51% had history of diabetes, 46% had history of hypertension, 98% received anticoagulation, 66% were on steroids, and 35% received at least one potential nephrotoxic medication. Severe AKI was present in 54% of patients. Biopsy findings included FSGS in 29%, diabetic nephropathy in 27%, and arteriosclerosis in 81%. Acute tubular injury grades 2-3 were observed in 49%. Histopathologic characteristics were not associated with severe AKI; however, pigment casts on the biopsy were associated with significantly lower probability of kidney function recovery (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.77). The use of aminoglycosides/colistin, levels of C-reactive protein and serum albumin, previous use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, antivirals, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, and anticoagulants were associated with specific histopathologic findings. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of chronic comorbidities was found on kidney biopsies. Nonrecovery from severe AKI was associated with the presence of pigmented casts. Inflammatory markers and medications were associated with specific histopathologic findings in patients dying from COVID-19.

Relationship between protein-energy wasting in adults with chronic hemodialysis and the response to treatment with erythropoietin.

BACKGROUND: It is known that one of the leading causes of morbidity in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is the anemic syndrome. Although the pathogenic mechanisms of anemia are multiple, erythropoietin deficiency appears as the dominant factor. Patients in hemodialysis (HD) have a high prevalence of protein energy wasting (PEW) that may explains the poor response to Erythropoietin (EPO). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients on HD from January to December 2014. The participants were classified according to a diagnostic of PEW using the "Malnutrition Inflammation Score" (MIS) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA) measurement of body composition at the start of erythropoietin therapy and after 3 months of follow up. We performed descriptive statistics and analyzed the differences between groups with and without PEW considering their responsiveness. In addition, we calculated the relative risk of EPO resistance, considering p value < 0.05 as statistically significant. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients ended the follow up. Both groups were similar in basal hemoglobin, hematocrit and other hematopoiesis markers (p = NS). Patients without PEW have a decrease risk for poor response to treatment with EPO (RR = 0.562 [95% CI, 0.329-0.961-]) than those with PEW. Finally, hemoglobin concentrations were evaluated at baseline and every four weeks until week 12, finding a statistically significant improvement only in patients without PEW according MIS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PEW is an incremental predictor of poor responsiveness to EPO in HD patients, thus, it is important to consider correcting malnutrition or wasting for a favorable response to treatment with EPO.

Derivation and validation of a simple inflammation-based risk score system for predicting in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of inflammatory status of patients during acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has become of great importance in their risk classification and in the research of new anti-inflammatory therapies. METHOD: The study cohort included 7396 patients with ACS. We sought to derive and internally validate an inflammation-based score that included high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and serum albumin level at admission to evaluate the predictive role of systemic inflammation in the clinical outcome of these patients. We randomly assigned patients into derivation (66.6%) and validation (33.4%) cohorts. A total of four categories of systemic inflammation were defined. RESULTS: Assessed individually, the three biomarkers were associated with a higher rate of in-hospital mortality. When we combined them into an inflammation score, in-hospital mortality was significantly different across the four categories of inflammation in the derivation cohort (1.8%, 2.8%, 4.1%, and 13.8% for without, mild, moderate, and severe inflammation, respectively; p<0.0001, C-statistic, 0.71). These results were similar in the validation cohort (1.1%, 2.9%, 5.2%, and 12.6%, respectively; p<0.0001, C-statistic, 0.71). After multivariate adjustment, only the category of severe systemic inflammation was associated with a threefold increased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratios 3.02, p<0.0001) and was the most powerful predictor of mortality. In the whole cohort, after subsetting patients based on GRACE risk score, the severe inflammation category was associated with a significant increase of in-hospital mortality across all sub-groups, mainly in patients with higher GRACE risk score. The inflammation-based risk score reclassified 25.3% of the population. The net reclassification index was 8.2% (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: A risk score system based on biomarkers of inflammation readily available at admission in patients with ACS, could better assess the inflammatory status and predict in-hospital mortality, as well as severe systemic inflammation that contributes to a worse outcome independently of clinical risk factors.

[Acceso vascular en apoyo renal agudo].

El acceso vascular es el primer eslabón para la terapia de apoyo extracorpórea renal. A diferencia de la terapia de reemplazo renal para pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica donde la fístula arteriovenosa es la primera opción, seguida del catéter tunelizado, en pacientes con lesión renal aguda el acceso vascular de elección es el catéter temporal. El presente estudio constituye una revisión narrativa de resumen de los estudios que analizan la elección, colocación y cuidados del acceso vascular temporal para apoyo renal agudo. En pacientes que cuentan con fístula arteriovenosa preexistente, su punción en pacientes con inestabilidad hemodinámica conlleva riesgos y no puede ser recomendada. El uso del catéter tunelizado de primera intención implica una destreza, tiempo y costos que limitan igualmente su recomendación. El cambio de catéteres por guía metálica ha mostrado ser un método seguro en ausencia de infección del catéter a retirar. El acceso femoral ha mostrado no ser inferior al acceso yugular derecho, mientras el acceso yugular izquierdo reduce la vida del circuito y debe ser considerado como cuarta opción después del yugular derecho, el femoral derecho y el femoral izquierdo. La longitud del acceso debe evaluarse de acuerdo con el sitio de inserción, mientras que los catéteres de 20 cm suelen ser adecuados para punción de la yugular derecha, la yugular izquierda suele requerir 25 cm para su llegada a la aurícula derecha. Por su parte, el acceso femoral incrementa su desempeño con longitudes de 25 a 35 cm. La punción yugular posterior baja derecha es considerada una técnica de abordaje sencilla, segura y que permite una aproximación de hasta 5 cm más caudal hacia la aurícula derecha. La interacción entre catéteres centrales debe ser anticipada o evaluada ante el riesgo de aspiración de infusiones por el circuito extracorpóreo. En el cuidado del catéter, la aplicación de heparina 1,000 U/ml reduce el riesgo de sangrado al sellar los puertos comparada con heparina 5,000 U/ml. Por último, se presenta información sobre la elección de dispositivos de cobertura, el método de fijación, los materiales de recubrimiento de catéteres y el empleo de antibióticos, incluyendo las posturas de las guías del Kidney Dialysis Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) y la European Renal Best Practice (ERBP), además de la información disponible en el consenso del Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative, revisiones sistemáticas, metaanálisis y ensayos clínicos controlados.Vascular access is the first link for renal extracorporeal support therapy. Unlike renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease where the arteriovenous fistula is the first option, followed by the tunneled catheter, in patients with acute kidney injury a temporary catheter is the first choice. The present article constitutes a narrative review summarizing the studies that analyze the choice, placement and care of temporary vascular access for acute renal support. In patients who have a pre-existing arteriovenous fistula, their puncture in patients with hemodynamic instability carries risks and cannot be recommended. The use of tunneled catheter as first option implies a complex, time-consuming procedure with higher cost that also limits its recommendation. The change of catheters by metal guide has shown to be a safe method in the absence of infection. Femoral access has been shown not to be inferior to right jugular access, while left jugular access reduces the life of the circuit and should be considered as a fourth option after right jugular, right femoral and left femoral sites. The length of the access should be evaluated according to the insertion site, while 20 cm catheters are usually suitable for right jugular puncture, the left jugular usually requires 25 cm for achieving the position inside the right atrium. On the other hand, the femoral access increases its performance with lengths of 25-35 cm. The low posterior jugular approach is considered a simple, safe technique that allows up to 5 cm further towards the right atrium. The interaction between central catheters must be anticipated or evaluated because of the risk of aspiration of infusions by the extracorporeal circuit. The use of heparin 1000 U/ml for sealing the ports reduces the risk of bleeding compared to heparin 5000 U/ml. The reasoning on the evolution of catheters in structural coating materials, the decision on using a suture, the differences among dressings or securement devices, and the controversy over the use of antibiotics for sealing ports and for dressings are also discussed. The review includes the positions of the guidelines by the Kidney Dialysis Improving Global Outcomes and the European Renal Best Practice, in addition to the information available mainly on the consensus of the acute dialysis quality initiative, systematic reviews, meta-analysis and controlled clinical trials.

Características clinicopatológicas de la vasculitis renal pauciinmune en México: reporte de 23 casos / Clinical and pathological characteristics of pauci-immune renal vasculitis in Mexico: report of 23 cases

Resumen Introducción: La vasculitis de anticuerpos anticitoplasma de neutrófilo (ANCA) con frecuencia involucra el riñón, con un pobre pronóstico a corto plazo. Presentamos una serie corta de casos atendidos de 2008 a 2012, en un hospital de tercer nivel, enfatizando en las características clínicas y patológicas a su presentación en urgencias, derivado de que en México no existe una publicación sobre serie de casos de vasculitis renal ANCA asociada, únicamente casos descritos aislados. Objetivo: Describir el comportamiento clínico de la vasculitis ANCA-asociada en una población mexicana. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, de 23 casos de vasculitis con compromiso renal. Resultados: La población representada por 13 mujeres y 10 hombres, guardando una relación de 1.3:1, con una edad promedio de 47 ± 16 arios, 21,7% con antecedente de diabetes, 26% con hipertensión y 8,7% con antecedente de enfermedad autoinmune, con un tiempo promedio de evolución de sintomatologia renal de 2,8 ± 2,2 meses y una creatinina promedio de 8 ± 6,3mg/dl que confiere una tasa de filtrado glomerular de 7ml/min/m2 a su ingreso, el 100% de los pacientes con microhematuria y un dismorfismo presente en el 20,9 ± 12,2% de los pacientes. Es importante destacar que se documentó en el 30% datos de vasculitis pulmonar, 21,7% vasculitis cutánea y en tubo digestivo; el 65% ameritó terapia sustitutiva de la función renal a su ingreso, cifra que se mantuvo 12 meses después, con 3 defunciones asociadas a la actividad de vasculitis incontrolable y tan solo 21,7% de los pacientes permaneció libre de terapia sustitutiva pero con importante deterioro en la función renal a 12 meses posevento. Conclusiones: La vasculitis renal ANCA asociada tiene un pobre pronóstico a corto plazo, cuya sobrevida está íntimamente relacionada al tiempo de evolución de la actividad de la enfermedad y a su intervención inmunosupresora oportuna.

Abstract Introduction: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) vasculitis often involves a kidney Vasculitis with a poor short-term prognosis. A short series of cases are presented that were treated from 2008 to 2012 in a third level hospital. Emphasis is placed on the clinical and pathological characteristics of their presentation in the emergency room, and the fact that there are no publications of a series of cases of ANCA-associated renal vasculitis. Objective: To describe the clinical outcome of ANCA-associated vasculitis in a Mexican population. Materials and methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 23 cases of vasculitis with renal involvement. Results: The study included 13 women and 10 men, with a ratio of 1.3: 1, with a mean age of 47 ± 16 years, in which 21.7% had a history of diabetes, 26% with hypertension, and 8.7% with a history of autoimmune disease. The mean duration of renal symptoms was 2.8± 2.2 months, with a mean creatinine of 8.0 ± 6.3mg/dl. The mean glomerular filtration rate was 7 ml/min/m2 at admission. All (100%) of the patients had microhaematuria, and 20.9 ± 12.2% of the patients showed dysmorphism. It is important to note that 30% of pulmonary vasculitis, 21.7% cutaneous vasculitis, and digestive tract were documented. Approximately two-thirds (65%) required renal replacement therapy on admission, a figure that remained 12 months later. There were 3 deaths associated with the activity of uncontrollable vasculitis, and only 21.7% of the patients remained free of renal replacement therapy, but with a significant deterioration in renal function at 12 months post-event. Conclusions: ANCA associated renal vasculitis has a poor short-term prognosis, and survival is closely related to the time of evolution of the disease activity and its appropriate immunosuppressive intervention.

The Effect of Spironolactone on Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery-related acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common postoperative complication that greatly increases morbidity and mortality. There are currently no effective interventions to prevent AKI associated with cardiac surgery. Experimental data have shown that administration of the mineralocorticoid receptor blocker spironolactone prevents renal injury induced by ischemia-reperfusion in rats. The objective of this study was to test whether short-term perioperative administration of oral spironolactone could reduce the incidence of AKI in cardiac surgical patients. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from April 2014 through July 2015 at the National Heart Institute in Mexico. 233 patients were included; 115 and 118 received spironolactone or placebo, respectively. INTERVENTION: Spironolactone or placebo once at a dose of 100mg 12 to 24 hours before surgery and subsequently 3 further doses of 25mg in postoperative days 0, 1, and 2 were administered. OUTCOMES: Patients were followed up for 7 days or until discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary end point was AKI incidence defined by KDIGO criteria. Secondary end points included requirement of renal replacement therapy, ICU length of stay, and ICU mortality. Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Mean age was 53.2±15 years, mean serum creatinine level was 0.9±0.2mg/dL, median Thakar score for estimation of AKI risk was 2 (IQR, 1-3), and 25% had diabetes. The incidence of AKI was higher for the spironolactone group (43% vs 29%; P=0.02). No significant differences were found for secondary end points. LIMITATIONS: Single center, AKI was mostly driven by AKI stage 1, planned sample size was not achieved, and there was no renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system washout period. CONCLUSIONS: Our trial demonstrated that spironolactone was not protective for AKI associated with cardiac surgery and there may be a trend toward risk.

Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol are Associated With Biomarkers of Inflammation in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Pathologic conditions associated with inflammation show an inverse correlation between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and inflammatory biomarker levels. Our aim was to investigate, in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), whether very low HDL-C levels are associated with inflammatory biomarkers. In a cross-sectional study, we included 6,134 patients with ACS; they were classified as having very low (<30 mg/dl), low (30 to 39.9 mg/dl), and normal HDL-C (≥ 40 mg/dl) levels. We analyzed the association of different categories of HDL-C levels with serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), albumin, and white blood cell count at admission. Overall, 18.5% of patients had very low HDL-C levels. Patients with very low HDL-C levels, compared to patients with low or normal HDL-C levels, had the highest hs-CRP (median 17.8 [interquartile range 7.2 to 54.5] vs 12.6 [5.6 to 33.9] vs 12.0 [5.4 to 36.9] mg/L, respectively, p <0.001) and the lowest albumin levels (median 3.6 [IQR 3.3 to 4.0] vs 3.8 [3.5 to 4.0] vs 3.8 [3.5 to 4.1] g/dl, respectively, p <0.001). White blood cell count did not differ significantly (p = 0.40). The multivariate analysis showed that albumin ≤ 3.5 g/dl (odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.88 to 2.49, p <0.001) and hs-CRP ≥ 10 mg/L (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.55, p <0.001) were independent predictors of very low HDL-C levels. Patients with very low HDL-C levels had the highest inhospital mortality rates compared with the other groups. In conclusion, in patients with ACS, hs-CRP and serum albumin were associated independently with very low HDL-C levels.

A pilot study on the impact of a low fructose diet and allopurinol on clinic blood pressure among overweight and prehypertensive subjects: a randomized placebo controlled trial.

Fructose and sodium intake have been associated with hypertension and metabolic syndrome. Although various mechanisms are involved, fructose causes hypertension partly through rising intracellular and serum uric acid. To date, there are no studies in adults that have evaluated the impact of low fructose diets and allopurinol on prehypertensive and overweight subjects. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of low fructose diet and allopurinol or placebo on blood pressure (BP) and metabolic syndrome components The study was a controlled clinical trial and consisted of two phases; in the first phase of intervention (4 weeks), patients were randomized to either low fructose diet (34 patients) or control diet (38 patients). In the second phase of intervention (weeks 4-8), the same groups continued with the same diet prescriptions but were further randomized to receive placebo or allopurinol (300 mg/d). Clinic and 24-hour ambulatory BP, anthropometric measures, and laboratory data were determined at baseline, weeks 4 and 8. Seventy-two patients were included in the trial. At the end of the dietary phase, both diet groups significantly reduced their BP, but there were no between-group differences. Compared to placebo, at the end of follow-up, subjects in the allopurinol group had a lower clinic systolic blood pressure and this was significant within- and between-group comparisons. The percentage of dippers was higher in the allopurinol group, and weight was reduced significantly despite the absence of caloric restriction Allopurinol was associated with a significant reduction in clinic BP, an increase in the percentage of dippers, and significant weight loss. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm our findings.

The impact of integrating nephrologists into the postoperative cardiac intensive care unit: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the potential preventive effect of Nephrology On-Site (i.e. nephrologists integrated into the postoperative cardiac intensive care unit, ICU, team) versus Nephrology On-Demand (i.e. nephrology consultation depending on intensivist criteria) in the ICU on in-hospital outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes during 2 consecutive time periods: from March 1, 2009 to February 28, 2010 with Nephrology On-Demand, and from March 1, 2010 to February 28, 2011 with Nephrology On-Site. Adult patients admitted to the postoperative cardiac ICU in an academic hospital in Mexico City were eligible. Patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 or minimally invasive procedures were excluded. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,096 patients, 558 and 538 in the respective periods. The patients were 52.4 ± 16.2 years old, 56.1% were males, 17.2% had diabetes and 37.6% had hypertension. Further, the patients' median Euroscore was 5 (3-5) and their median Thakar score was 3 (2-4). With Nephrology On-Site, we observed a lower incidence of acute kidney injury [AKI; 25.7 vs. 31.9%, p = 0.02; adjusted OR 0.71 (0.53-0.95), p = 0.02], lower in-hospital mortality among patients with severe AKI [34.1 vs. 55.9%, p = 0.06; adjusted OR 0.33 (0.12-0.95), p = 0.04] and higher renal recovery [61.0 vs. 35.3%, p = 0.03; adjusted OR 3.57 (1.27-10.11), p = 0.02]. No differences were found in the length of stay at the ICU and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: Integrating nephrologists into the postoperative cardiac ICU team was associated with a lower incidence of AKI. Patients who developed severe AKI had lower in-hospital mortality and higher renal recovery.