ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: To analyze whether inter-eye osmo larity differences were related to dry eye symptomatology. Methods: A total of 135 participants were randomly recruited from those who visited in the Optometry Clinic of the Optometry Faculty (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela). In a single scheduled session after the recruitment, Ocular Surface Disease Index was filled out following the standard instructions and TearLab measurements were made in both the participants' eyes (10-15 min lapse). Osmolarity values were compared between the right and left eyes and the absolute inter-ocular difference (-OD-OS-) correlated with the Ocular Surface Disease Index score for the whole sample. Based on the Ocular Surface Disease Index score, the sample was divided into four symptomatic subgroups, and differences in the -OD-OS- values were calculated. Results: The whole sample showed a statistically significant inter-eye osmolarity difference (p=0.025; -OD-OS- = 9.2 ± 9.3 mOsm/l) and the correlation between Ocular Surface Disease Index and -OD-OS- (r=0.369; p<0.001). A statistically significant difference was found in the -OD-OS- value between symptomatic subgroups (Kruskal-Wallis, p=0.003). Mann-Whitney U test showed a significant difference between asymptomatic vs. moderate (p=0.006) vs. severe symp tomatic patients (p=0.001) and between mild vs. severe symptomatic patients (p=0.045), whereas no difference on -OD-OS- was found between participants with contiguous symptomatic subgroups (all p³0.174). Conclusion: Tear film inter-eye osmolarity differences are significantly higher in severe dry eye disease symptoms.
RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar se as diferenças entre osmolaridade entre os olhos foram relacionadas à sintomatologia do olho seco. Métodos: Um total de 135 participantes foram recrutados aleatoriamente entre os indivíduos da Clínica de Optometria da Faculdade de Optometria (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela). Em uma única sessão agendada após o recrutamento, o Índice de Doenças da Superfície Ocular foi preenchido seguindo as instruções padrão e as mensurações do TearLab foram feitas em ambos os olhos dos participantes (lapso de 10 a 15 min). Os valores de osmolaridade foram com parados entre os olhos direito e o esquerdo e a diferença absoluta ocular (-OD-OS-) correlacionada com a pontuação do Índice de Doença da Superfície Ocular para toda a amostra. Com base na pontuação do Índice de Doença da Superfície Ocular, a amostra foi dividida em quatro subgrupos sintomáticos, e as diferenças nos -OD-OS- os valores foram calcula dos. Resultados: A amostra total mostrou uma diferença de osmolarida de entre os olhos estatisticamente significativa (p=0,025; -OD-OS- = 9,2 ± 9,3 mOsm/l) e a correlação entre o Índice de Doença da Superfície Ocular e -OD-OS- (r=0,369; p<0,001). Diferença estatisticamente significativa foi encontrada no valor -OD-OS- entre os subgrupos sintomáticos (Kruskal-Wallis, p=0,003). O teste U de Mann-Whitney mostrou uma diferença significativa entre pacientes assintomáticos versus moderados (p=0,006) versus sintomáticos graves (p=0,001) e entre pacientes sinto máticos leves e graves (p=0,045), enquanto que nenhuma di ferença de -OD-OS- foi encontrada entre os participantes de subgrupos sintomáticos contíguos (todos p³0,174). Conclusão: As diferenças entre osmolaridade inter-ocular do filme lacrimal são significativamente maiores nos sintomas graves da doença do olho seco.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Tears/chemistry , Dry Eye Syndromes/physiopathology , Osmolar Concentration , Reference Values , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To analyze whether inter-eye osmo larity differences were related to dry eye symptomatology. METHODS: A total of 135 participants were randomly recruited from those who visited in the Optometry Clinic of the Optometry Faculty (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela). In a single scheduled session after the recruitment, Ocular Surface Disease Index was filled out following the standard instructions and TearLab measurements were made in both the participants' eyes (10-15 min lapse). Osmolarity values were compared between the right and left eyes and the absolute inter-ocular difference (|OD-OS|) correlated with the Ocular Surface Disease Index score for the whole sample. Based on the Ocular Surface Disease Index score, the sample was divided into four symptomatic subgroups, and differences in the |OD-OS| values were calculated. RESULTS: The whole sample showed a statistically significant inter-eye osmolarity difference (p=0.025; |OD-OS| = 9.2 ± 9.3 mOsm/l) and the correlation between Ocular Surface Disease Index and |OD-OS| (r=0.369; p<0.001). A statistically significant difference was found in the |OD-OS| value between symptomatic subgroups (Kruskal-Wallis, p=0.003). Mann-Whitney U test showed a significant difference between asymptomatic vs. moderate (p=0.006) vs. severe symp tomatic patients (p=0.001) and between mild vs. severe symptomatic patients (p=0.045), whereas no difference on |OD-OS| was found between participants with contiguous symptomatic subgroups (all p³0.174). CONCLUSION: Tear film inter-eye osmolarity differences are significantly higher in severe dry eye disease symptoms.
Subject(s)
Dry Eye Syndromes/physiopathology , Tears/chemistry , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osmolar Concentration , Reference Values , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hyperosmolarity of tear fluid has been recognised as a common feature of all types of dry eye disease. This study was designed to assess the inter-session reproducibility of a freezing point depression osmometer (Fiske 110) as the most common and precise way of measuring osmolality, by using two different volumes of tear samples on healthy subjects, and to determine the possible applications of this device in tear film research and clinical practice. METHODS: Measurements were made by using the Fiske 110 osmometer under two different tear sample volumes (4 µl and 2 µl). In both cases, samples were diluted in purified water to obtain the 20 µl required by the device to perform the measurement (1:4 and 1:9 dilutions, respectively). Inter-session reproducibility was determined in two groups of 40 healthy subjects, in two sessions, one week apart. In each group, one of the two different tear sample volumes was used to determine the reproducibility of each technique. RESULTS: No significant differences were detected between the measurements obtained in the two sessions using the 4 µl (paired t-test, p = 0.772; mean difference ± SD = -0.85 ± 18.77 mOsm/L; 95 per cent limits of agreement [LoAs] = -37.64/+35.94) or the 2 µl volume sample (paired t-test, p = 0.054; mean difference ± SD = 9.27 ± 29.44 mOsm/L; 95 per cent LoAs = -48.43/+66.97). CONCLUSIONS: Whereas both techniques show an acceptable inter-session reproducibility, the bias range with the present protocol was higher using the 2 µl tear sample volume than the 4 µl one. Therefore, it seems that the diluted 4 µl sample was the only dilution that could be acceptable for use in routine clinical practice for tear film analysis.
