Prospective multicentre systematic guideline-based management of patients referred to the Syncope Units of general hospitals.

AIMS: Although an organizational model for syncope management facilities was proposed in the 2004 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), its implementation in clinical practice and its effectiveness are largely unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective study enrolled 941 consecutive patients referred to the Syncope Units of nine general hospitals from 15 March 2008 to 15 September 2008. A median of 15 patients per month were examined in each unit, but the five older units had a two-fold higher volume of activity than the four newer ones (instituted <1 year before): 23 vs. 12, P = 0.02. These figures give an estimated volume of 163 and 60 patients per 100,000 inhabitants per year, respectively. Referrals: 60% from out-of-hospital services, 11% immediate and 13% delayed referrals from the Emergency Department, and 16% hospitalized patients. A diagnosis was established on initial evaluation in 191 (21%) patients and early by means of 2.9 +/- 1.6 tests in 541 (61%) patients. A likely reflex cause was established in 67%, orthostatic hypotension in 4%, cardiac in 6% and non-syncopal in 5% of the cases. The cause of syncope remained unexplained in 159 (18%) patients, despite a mean of 3.5 +/- 1.8 tests per patient. These latter patients were older, more frequently had structural heart disease or electrocardiographic abnormalities, unpredictable onset of syncope due to the lack of prodromes, and higher OESIL and EGSIS risk scores than the other groups of patients. The mean costs of diagnostic evaluation was 209 euro per outpatient and 1073 euro per inpatient. The median cost of hospital stay was 2990 euro per patient. CONCLUSION: We documented the current practice of syncope management in specialized facilities that have adopted the management model proposed by the ESC. The results are useful for those who wish to replicate this model in other hospitals. Syncope remains unexplained during in-hospital evaluation in more complex cases at higher risk.

[Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death: should we juist consider ejection fraction?]. / La stratificazione del rischio di morte improvvisa: dobbiamo considerare solo la frazione di eiezione?

Sudden cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death in industrialized countries. There is solid clinical evidence for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators as the only effective means of preventing sudden cardiac arrest and reducing mortality in high-risk patients. The therapeutic strategy has definitively been validated, but we have not yet identified with the same effectiveness the patients who most likely will benefit from such therapy. Risk stratification of sudden death is therefore one of the major unresolved issues of modern cardiology. Current guidelines identify ejection fraction as the only instrumental parameter for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death. It is strongly consolidated from "old and new" clinical trials that ejection fraction reduction is the real powerful predictor of total mortality and sudden death regardless of its etiology; however it cannot be considered as an indisputable gold standard predictor of risk because it lacks of sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of sudden death. It is reasonable that many factors besides ejection fraction influence patient prognosis; there are different aspects suggesting that a reduction in ejection fraction is a risk factor only in combination with other risk factors. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy is expensive and associated with possible complications. We therefore need better methods for risk stratification of our patients in order to increase the real cost-effectiveness of current and future treatment options.

Surgical ablation of arrhythmias.

The surgical approach was the earliest therapeutic ablation of hyperkinetic arrhythmias. Following the progressive improvements in electrophysiological mapping and operative techniques, new surgical approaches have been developed for the treatment of those arrhythmias related to ectopic phenomena or reentry mechanisms. These procedures have been proven to be highly effective but the associated morbidity and mortality were unacceptably high. More recent and advanced techniques of transcatheter ablation have revolutionized the treatment of these arrhythmias and now represent the treatment of choice in the majority of cases. However, the significant reduction in the operative risk and the improvement in patient outcome with respect to the past, thanks to a better patient selection and to advances in the surgical and myocardial protection techniques, make do that the surgical approach to some forms of arrhythmias is still valid, especially in those cases requiring associated surgery: atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with congenital heart disease, post-ischemic ventricular tachycardias in patients who necessitate myocardial revascularization, and/or ventricular remodeling and chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients who require cardiac surgery. New techniques such as radiofrequency, microwaves and cryoablation guarantee the creation of linear and transmural lesions with minimum damage to the cardiac structures and appear very interesting as they are surgically simple and associated with shorter procedure times and less complications. The possibility of performing the ablative procedure completely on the epicardial surface may open the way for atrial fibrillation surgery on a totally beating heart and for procedures that are ever less invasive thus enabling treatment of patients without associated surgical indications.